深层稠油减氧空气吞吐注气量确定方法研究

doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2020.01.15.01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 鲁克沁油田减氧空气吞吐注气时一般采用笼统注气，没有相关优化注气量的明确方法，导致增油效果在不同类型单井之间有较大差异。为此，通过物模实验确定优势通道注气量，进行数值模拟并提出优势通道注气系数α、优势通道进气系数β的概念，结合优势通道体积优化注气量。通过模拟不同注气量吞吐时的换油率大小来验证优化结果是否正确，得到对实际现场应用的注气量有理论指导作用的优化计算公式。实验表明，最优注气量为0.20 PV，优势通道注气系数为0.8，表明有80%的气进入到优势通道中，优势通道进气系数为0.348，说明距生产井约1/3的井距范围为受效区域。经过注气量优化公式计算和数模验证，最优注气量为4.5×10⁵ m³是合适充分的。优化方法结合减氧空气吞吐的增油机理与现场实际需求，对减氧空气吞吐注气量的相关设计具有一定的理论意义和现场应用价值。

关键词: 减氧空气, 吞吐, 注气量, 优势水流通道, 鲁克沁油田

Abstract: Lukeqin Oilfield adopts general gas injection in oxygen-reduced air flooding. There is no established method for optimizing gas injection, which results in great differences in oil production increase effects between different types of single wells. The pore volume multiples of gas injection in the dominant channel are determined through physical model experiments; numerical simulation experiments are carried out to propose the concepts of the gas injection/inlet coefficient α and β in the dominant channel, which are combined with the volume of the dominant channel to optimize the throughput. By simulating the oil exchange rate during the throughput of different gas injection volumes to verify the optimization results, an optimization calculation formula with theoretical guidance for the actual gas injection volume in the field is obtained. The experiments show that the optimal gas injection pore volume multiple is 0.20 PV, and the gas injection coefficient α of the dominant channel is 0.8, indicating that 80% of the gas enters the dominant channel, and the gas inlet coefficient of the dominant channel is 0.348, indicating that 1/3 of the well spacing to the production well is the distance the affected area covers. After the calculation of the gas injection volume optimization formula and the verification of the digital model, we conclude that the optimal gas injection volume of 4.5×10⁵ m³ is adequate. The optimization method combines the oil increasing mechanism of oxygen-reduced air throughput with the actual demand in the field, and has certain theoretical significance and field application value for the related design of oxygen-reduced oxygen throughput.

Key words: oxygen-reduced, huff and puff, air injection volume, dominant water flow channel, Lukeqin Oilfield

中图分类号:

TE327

郭小哲, 曹玉峰, 田凯. 深层稠油减氧空气吞吐注气量确定方法研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(2): 110-116.

GUO Xiaozhe, CAO Yufeng, TIAN Kai. A Study on Optimized Method of Gas Injection Volume of the Oxygen-reduced Air Flooding in Deep Heavy Oil Reservior[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2021, 43(2): 110-116.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2020.01.15.01

http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/Y2021/V43/I2/110

参考文献

[1] 王海勇,王小洪,王宏业. 鲁克沁超深稠油冷采技术对策研究[J]. 西部探矿工程, 2011, 30(3):31-34. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-5716.2011.03.011 WANG Haiyong, WANG Xiaohong, WANG Hongye. Study on technical countermeasures for cold production of Lukeqin ultra-deep heavy oil[J]. West-China Exploration Engineering, 2011, 30(3):31-34. doi:10.3969/j.issn.10045716.2011.03.011
[2] 赵凤兰,付忠凤,郝宏达,等. 氮气泡沫吞吐的控水增油机理[J]. 油田化学, 2018, 35(3):451-457. doi:10.19346/j.cnki.1000-4092.2018.03.014 ZHAO Fenglan, FU Zhongfeng, HAO Hongda, et al. Mechanism of nitrogen foam preventing edge-water coning in huff-n-puff well[J]. Oilfield Chemistry, 2018, 35(3):451-457. doi:10.19346/j.cnki.1000-4092.2018.03.014
[3] 刘如杰. 超稠油组合式吞吐在曙光油田的应用[J]. 非常规油气,2018,5(5):68-74. doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-8471.2018.05.011 LIU Rujie. Application of super heavy oil combined huff and puff in Shuguang Oilfield[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2018, 5(5):68-74. doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-8471.2018.05.011
[4] 王正茂,廖广志,蒲万芬,等. 注空气开发中地层原油氧化反应特征[J]. 石油学报, 2018, 39(3):314-319. doi:10.7623/syxb201803006 WANG Zhengmao, LIAO Guangzhi, PU Wanfen, et al. Oxidation reaction features of formation crude oil in air injection development[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2018, 39(3):314-319. doi:10.7623/syxb201803006
[5] 王世璐,王玉霞,贾凯锋. 低渗透油藏岩心注CO₂驱油效率物理模拟[J]. 非常规油气, 2019, 6(2):85-90. doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-8471.2019.02.013 WANG Shilu, WANG Yuxia, JIA Kaifeng. Physical simulation of CO₂ flooding efficiency in low permeability reservoir core[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2019, 6(2):85-90. doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-8471.2019.02.013
[6] 钟立国,王成,刘建斌,等. 中深层稠油油藏蒸汽氮气复合吞吐技术[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2019, 40(2):194-198. doi:10.7657/XJPG20190211 ZHONG Liguo, WANG Cheng, LIU Jianbin, et al. Nitrogen assisted steam stimulation technology for middeep heavy oil reservoirs[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2019, 40(2):194-198. doi:10.7657/XJPG20190211
[7] 李松林,张云辉,赵健. 鲁克沁油田鲁2块水驱后天然气气水交替驱油模拟研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2013, 20(1):95-98. doi:10.3969/j.issn.10066535.2013.01.025 LI Songlin, ZHANG Yunhui, ZHAO Jian. Simulation study of natural gas-water alternate flooding after water flooding in Lu-2 Block of Lukeqin Oilfield[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2013, 20(1):95-98. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2013.01.025
[8] 王琼. 深层稠油油藏注天然气/减氧空气提高采收率机理实验研究[D]. 成都:西南石油大学, 2017. WANG Qiong. Mechanism experimental study of eor in deep heavy oil reservoir by natural gas/disoxidation air injection[D]. Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University, 2017.
[9] 苏伟,侯吉瑞,刘娟,等. 缝洞型碳酸盐岩油藏注气吞吐EOR效果评价[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(1):133-139. doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2015.04.24.01 SU Wei, HOU Jirui, LIU Juan, et al. Evaluation of EOR effect of gas huff-n-puff in fractured vuggy carbonate reservoirs[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2017, 39(1):133-139. doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2015.04.24.01
[10] 吕铁. 缝洞型油藏注氮气吞吐参数优化研究[J]. 特种油气藏, 2018, 25(5):119-124. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2018.05.023 LÜ Tie. Nitrogen huff-puff parameter optimization in fracture-cavity reservoir[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2018, 25(5):119-124. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2018.05.023
[11] 庄园. 超低渗油藏注减氧空气驱油机理研究[D]. 青岛:中国石油大学(华东), 2017. ZHUANG Yuan. Injection of air with reduced oxygen for improved oil recovery from ultra-low permeability oil reservoirs[D]. Qingdao:China University of Petroleum (East China), 2017.
[12] 廖广志,杨怀军,蒋有伟,等. 减氧空气驱适用范围及氧含量界限[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(1):105-110. doi:10.11698/PED.2018.01.10 LIAO Guangzhi, YANG Huaijun, JIANG Youwei, et al. Applicable scope of oxygen-reduced air flooding and the limit of oxygen content[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(1):105-110. doi:10.11698/PED.2018.01.10
[13] 吴海俊,付美龙,孙晶,等. 稠油油藏减氧空气高温泡沫剂蒸汽三元复合吞吐参数优化实验研究[J]. 当代化工,2018,47(10):2109-2113. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-0460.2018.10.029 WU Haijun, FU Meilong, SUN Jing, et al. Parameter optimization of ASP stimulation of oxygen reducing air/high temperature foam/steam in heavy oil reservoirs[J]. Contemporary Chemical Industry, 2018, 47(10):2109-2113. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-0460.2018.10.029
[14] 郭小哲,田凯,庞占喜,等. 深层稠油油藏减氧空气吞吐增油机理及地质因素影响分析[J]. 特种油气藏, 2019, 26(6):58-62. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2019.06.010 GUO Xiaozhe, TIAN Kai, PANG Zhanxi, et al. Oil enhancement mechanism and geological influencing factor analysis of disoxidation air huff-puff in deep heavyoil reservoir[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2019, 26(6):58-62. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2019.06.010
[15] 翟亚梅,严玉圃,万永清,等. 吐玉克油田深层稠油天然气吞吐技术研究与应用[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2012, 24(4):111-114. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2012.04.022 ZHAI Yamei, YAN Yupu, WAN Yongqing, et al. Research and application of gas huff and puff of deep heavy oil in the Tuyuke Oilfield[J]. Lithologic Reservoirs, 2012, 24(4):111-114. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2012.04.022
[16] 皮富强,董满仓,安继刚,等. 富县油田M区块长8低渗透油藏减氧空气驱效果评价[J]. 云南化工, 2019, 46(6):136-138, 142. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-275X.2019.06.054 PI Fuqiang, DONG Mancang, AN Jigang, et al. Evaluation of oxygen reduced air flooding in Chang 8 low permeability reservoir in Block M of Fuxian Oilfield[J]. Yunnan Chemical Technology, 2019, 46(6):136-138, 142. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-275X.2019.06.054
[17] 刘如杰. 非烃类气体采油技术在互层状超稠油开发实践与应用[J]. 非常规油气, 2019, 6(4):40-45, 75. doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-8471.2019.04.007 LIU Rujie. Practice and application of non hydrocarbon gas recovery in interbedded super heavy oil[J]. Unconventional Oil & Gas, 2019, 6(4):40-45, 75. doi:10.3969/j.issn.2095-8471.2019.04.007
[18] 汪玉琴,陈方鸿,顾鸿君,等. 利用示踪剂研究井间水流优势通道[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2011, 32(5):512-514. WANG Yuqin, CHEN Fanghong, GU Hongjun, et al. Using tracer to study interwell water flow predominant channel[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2011, 32(5):512-514.
[19] 张静. 利用水油比双对数曲线分析钟市油田水流优势通道[J]. 内蒙古石油化工, 2019, 45(2):55-56. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7981.2019.02.021 ZHANG Jing. Analyzing dominant channels of water flow in Zhongshi Oilfield using double logarithmic curve of water-oil ratio[J]. Inner Mongolia Petrochemical Industry, 2019, 45(2):55-56. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-7981.2019.02.021
[20] 乔勇. 优势通道分布特征研究——以文25东沙二下油藏为例[J]. 石化技术, 2019, 26(7):122-124. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-0235.2019.07.066 QIAO Yong. Study on the distribution characteristics of dominant channel-with the reservoirs of Wen 25 Dong Sha Erxia for example[J]. Petrochemical Industry Technology, 2019, 26(7):122-124. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-0235.2019.07.066
[21] 白雷,扎克坚,孟亚玲,等. 克拉玛依油田七区八道湾组油藏水流优势通道研究[J]. 新疆石油天然气, 2014, 10(1):88-91. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-2677.2014.01.020 BAI Lei, ZHA Kejian, MENG Yaling, et al. Research on dominant flow channels of Badaowan formation reservoir in District Seven of Karamay Oilfield[J]. Xinjiang Oil & Gas, 2014, 10(1):88-91. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-2677.2014.01.020