MDR概念系统注册及本体表示标准化研究

doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2020.05.22.03

西南石油大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6): 174-180.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2020.05.22.03

• 油气田人工智能技术与应用专刊 • 上一篇下一篇

MDR概念系统注册及本体表示标准化研究

袁靖舒¹, 李洪奇²

1. 中国石油大学(北京)信息科学与工程学院, 北京昌平 102249;
2. 中国石油大学(北京)石油数据挖掘北京市重点实验室, 北京昌平 102249

收稿日期:2020-05-22 发布日期:2020-12-21
通讯作者: 袁靖舒,E-mail:337539754@qq.com
作者简介:袁靖舒,1992年生,男,汉族,黑龙江安达人,博士研究生,主要从事石油地质及大数据方面的研究工作。E-mail:337539754@qq.com;李洪奇,1960年生,男,汉族,辽宁昌图人,教授,博士生导师,主要从事知识发现与数据挖掘和计算智能方面的研究工作。E-mail:hq.li@cup.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家重点基础研究发展计划（2009CB219505）；国家高技术研究发展计划（2013AA092501）

Research on MDR Concept System Model and Ontology Representation Standardization

YUAN Jingshu¹, LI Hongqi²

1. College of Information Science and Engineering, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Changping, Beijing 102249, China;
2. Beijing Key Lab of Petroleum Data Mining, China University of Petroleum(Beijing), Changping, Beijing 102249, China

Received:2020-05-22 Published:2020-12-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 随着大数据与人工智能在各个领域的深入应用，知识表示的标准化问题被提到了重要的日程。为实现知识表示的标准化，引入了现实世界、概念世界与计算机世界3个世界模型，明确阐述了将现实世界中的事物通过抽象，将其转化为概念世界中的概念系统模型，依据标准将其转化为计算机世界中的信息模型，从而实现知识表示。为了使概念系统模型表示规范化，重点研究了ISO/IEC 11179 MDR系列标准，剖析了其中的概念系统注册元模型规范，构建了MDR概念系统的七元组模型，同时还定义了概念间关系表示方法，为概念系统模型的表示奠定了基础。为了将注册在MDR中的概念系统模型转为计算机世界中的OWL本体表示模型，定义了将MDR概念系统向OWL本体映射的规则。最后，设计并开发了概念系统注册原型系统，验证了MDR概念系统和本体表示的可行性。研究成果为领域知识表示的标准化提供了方法论。

关键词: 知识表示, 概念系统, MDR概念元模型, 本体, 标准化

Abstract: With the in-depth application of big data and artificial intelligence in various fields, the standardization of knowledge representation has been mentioned as an important agenda. In order to realize the standardization of knowledge representation, this paper introduces the concept of "Three Worlds" model, that is, the real world, the conceptual world and the computer world. According to this model, things in real world can be abstracted concept in concept system model in concept world. Finally, acoording to concrete standards, the concept system model can be tanslated into information model in computer world, so as to realize knowledge representation. In order to standardize the representation of conceptual system model, series standards of ISO/IEC 11179 MDR is studied, the concept system registration meta-model specification is analyzed, and a seven tuple model of MDR concept system is constructed. In addition, the representation method of the relationship between concepts is defined, which lays the foundation for the representation of conceptual system model. In order to transform the concept system model registered in MDR into OWL ontology representation model in the computer world, the rules of mapping MDR concept system to OWL ontology is defined in the paper. Finally, the concept system registration prototype system was designed and developed to verify the feasibility of the MDR concept system and ontology representation. The research results provide a methodology for the standardization of domain knowledge representation.

Key words: knowledge representation, concept system, concept metamodel of MDR, ontology, standardization

中图分类号:

TE341

袁靖舒, 李洪奇. MDR概念系统注册及本体表示标准化研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(6): 174-180.

YUAN Jingshu, LI Hongqi. Research on MDR Concept System Model and Ontology Representation Standardization[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2020, 42(6): 174-180.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2020.05.22.03

http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/Y2020/V42/I6/174

参考文献

[1] International Organizati Standardization. Information technology Metadata registries(MDR) Part 1:Framework:ISO/IEC 11179-1-2004[S]. American National Standards Institute, 2004.
[2] International Organizati Standardization. Information technology Metadata registries(MDR) Part 2:Classification:ISO/IEC 11179-2-2005[S]. American National Standards Institute, 2005.
[3] International Organizati Standardization. Information technology Metadata registries(MDR) Part 3:Registry metamodel and basic attributes:ISO/IEC 11179-3-2013[S]. American National Standards Institute, 2013.
[4] International Organizati Standardization. Information technology Metadata registries(MDR) Part 4:Formulation of data definitions:ISO/IEC 11179-4-2004[S]. American National Standards Institute, 2004.
[5] International Organizati Standardization. Information technology Metadata registries(MDR) Part 5:Naming and identification principles, ISO/IEC 11179-5-2005[S]. American National Standards Institute, 2005.
[6] International Organizati Standardization. Information technology-Metadata registries(MDR)-Part 6:Registration, ISO/IEC 11179-6-2005[S]. American National Standards Institute, 2005.
[7] SYLVIE M N N, MATTHIAS L, JÜRGEN S. The ISO/IEC 11179 norm for metadata registries:Does it cover healthcare standards in empirical research?[J]. Journal of Biomedical Informatics, 2013, 46(2):318-327. doi:10.1016/j.jbi.2012.11.008
[8] LEE S, JEONG Dongwon, GIM Jangwon, et al. Canonical sensor ontology builder based on ISO/IEC 11179 for sensor network environments:A standardized approach[J]. International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, 2014(5):14. doi:10.1155/2014/790918
[9] 袁满,刘学博,翟红翠. 以概念为中心的自标准数据和标准化数据统一规范化体系模型研究[J]. 情报学报, 2016, 35(3):246-253. doi:10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2016.003.003 YUAN Man, LIU Xuebo, ZHAI Hongcui. Research on concept-centered unified standardization system model of self-standard data and standardized data[J]. Journal of the China Society for Scientific and Technical Information, 2016, 35(3):246-253. doi:10.3772/j.issn.1000-0135.2016.003.003
[10] 中国电子技术标准化研究院全国信息技术标准化技术委员会大数据标准工作组. 大数据标准化白皮书[EB/OL].[2018-03-01]. http://www.cesi.ac.cn/images/editor/20180124/20180124135528742.pdf. BIG Data Standard Work Group of National Information Technology Standardization Technology Committee of China Institute of Electronic Technology Standardization. Big data standardization white paper[EB/OL].[2018-03-01]. http://www.cesi.ac.cn/images/editor/2018-0124/20180124135528742.pdf.
[11] 中国电子技术标准化研究院. 知识图谱标准化白皮书[EB/OL].[2019-09-11]. http://www.cesi.cn/images/editor/20190911/20190911094806634.pdf. China Institute of Electronic Technology Standardization. White paper on standardization of knowledge graph[EB/OL].[2019-09-11]. http://www.cesi.cn/images/editor/20190911/20190911094806634.pdf.
[12] 中国电子技术标准化研究院. 人工智能标准化白皮书[EB/OL].[2018-04-04]. http://www.cesi.cn/images/editor/20180402/20180402120211919.pdf. China Institute of Electronic Technology Standardization. White paper on standardization of artificial intelligence[EB/OL].[2018-04-04]. http://www.cesi.cn/images/editor/20180402/20180402120211919.pdf.
[13] 袁满,王梅. 石油数据组织与分析[M]. 青岛:中国石油大学出版社, 2016. YUAN Man, WANG Mei. Petroleum data organization and analysis[M]. Qingdao:China University of Petroleum Press, 2016.
[14] 王珊,萨师煊. 数据库系统概论[M]. 北京:高等教育出报社, 2010. WANG Shan, SA Shixuan. An introduction to database system[M]. Beijing:Higher Education Press, 2010.
[15] 中国标准研究中心. 术语工作:GB/T 15237.1-2000[S]. 北京:中国标准出版社, 2000. China Standards Research Center. Terminology work:GB/T 15237.12000[S]. Beijing:China Standards Publishing House, 2000.
[16] 冯志伟. 术语学中的概念系统与知识本体[J]. 术语标准化与信息技术, 2006(1):9-15. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-2489.2006.01.003 FENG Zhiwei. Conception system and ontology in terminology[J]. Terminology Standardization and Information Technology, 2006(1):9-15. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1007-2489.2006.01.003
[17] International Standard. Terminology work-Vocabulary-Part 1:Theory and application:ISO 1087-1[S]. 1st ed. 2010.
[18] THOMAS R G. A translation approach to portable ontology knowledge specification[J]. Knowledge Acquistion, 1993, 5(2):199-220. doi:10.1006/knac.1993.1008
[19] STUDER R, BENJAMINS V R, FENSEL D. Knowledge engineering:Principles and methods[J]. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 1998, 25(1-2):161-197.10.1016/S0169-023X(97)00056-6
[20] 余凡. 领域本体构建方法及实证研究[M]. 武汉:武汉大学出版社, 2015. YU Fan. Domain ontology construction method and empirical research[M]. Wuhan:Wuhan University Press, 2015.
[21] NATALYA F. A gruide to creating your first ontology[EB/OL].[2016-01-20]. http://www.Protégé.Stanford.edu/publications/ontology_development/ontology-101.pdf.
[22] MAEDCHE A, STAAB S. Ontology learning for the semantic web[J]. IEEE Intelligent Systems, 2002, 16(2):72-79. doi:10.1109/5254.920602
[23] 胡兆芹. 本体与知识组织[M]. 北京:中国文史出版社, 2014. HU Zhaoqin. Ontology and knowledge organization[M]. Beijing:Chinese Literature and History Publishing House, 2014.

MDR概念系统注册及本体表示标准化研究

Research on MDR Concept System Model and Ontology Representation Standardization

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 5

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	肖基毅a;胡蓉a;王以群b. 石油网格数据挖掘新技术研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 30(3): 152-154.
[2]	周荣辉. 重视企业信息化建设中的数据资源建设 [J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2001, 23(1): 67-70.
[3]	李闽孙雷李士伦 . 回归分析确定递减期气藏参数方法 [J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 1999, 21(3): 8-11.
[4]	陈明亮　施太和　陈平. 如何解决专家系统的知识组合爆炸问题 [J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 1997, 19(3): 92-96.
[5]	陈伟成绥民胡泽张公社. 工程分析专家系统的问题求解黑板模型[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 1994, 16(2): 90-96.