面向完整性管理的海洋平台高危设备维修决策

doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2020.05.23.01

西南石油大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (6): 97-106.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2020.05.23.01

• 油气田人工智能技术与应用专刊 • 上一篇下一篇

面向完整性管理的海洋平台高危设备维修决策

唐洋^1,2, 杨鑫^1,2, 敬佳佳¹, 张志东³, 杨雁⁴

1. 西南石油大学机电工程学院, 四川成都 610500;
2. 南方海洋科学与工程广东省实验室(湛江), 广东湛江 524088;
3. 中国石油川庆钻探工程有限公司安全环保质量监督检测研究院, 四川广汉 618000;
4. 西南石油大学理学院, 四川成都 610500

收稿日期:2020-05-23 发布日期:2020-12-21
通讯作者: 唐洋,E-mail:tangyanggreat@126.com
作者简介:唐洋,1988年生,男,汉族,四川蓬溪人,副研究员,博士,主要从事设备完整性技术研究、油气装备现代设计与仿真方面的研究。E-mail:tangyanggreat@126.com;杨鑫,1995年生,男,汉族,四川巴中人,硕士研究生,主要从事设备完整性技术研究、油气装备现代设计与仿真方面的研究。E-mail:yx978351429@163.com;敬佳佳,1983年生,男,汉族,四川南充人,博士(后),主要从事石油智能机械装备设计及安全监测评估技术研究。E-mail:jingjiajia88@163.com;张志东,1974年生,男,汉族,江苏扬州人,高级工程师,主要从事设备完整性技术研究。E-mail:Zhangzhidong_0109@126.com;杨雁,1981年生,女,汉族,四川眉山人,副教授,博士,主要从事模糊数学及其应用、风险评估与分析、油气田开发规划与优化等方面的研究工作。E-mail:yangyan_yjsy@swpu.edu.cn
基金资助:
国家重点研发计划项目（2018YFC0310200）；四川省应用基础研究项目（2020YJ0152）；博士后创新人才支持计划项目（BX20190292）；四川省科技创新（苗子工程）培育及小发明小创造项目（2019090）；南方海洋科学与工程广东省实验室（湛江）项目（ZJW-2019-03）；油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室项目（PLN201827）；成都市国际科技合作资助项目（2020-GH02-00041-HZ）

Maintenance Decision of High-risk Equipment of Offshore Platform in Integrity Management

TANG Yang^1,2, YANG Xin^1,2, JING Jiajia¹, ZHANG Zhidong³, YANG Yan⁴

1. School of Mechatronic Engineering, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu Siahuan 610500, China;
2. Guangdong Laboratory of Southern Ocean Science and Engineering(Zhanjiang), Zhanjiang, Guangdong 524088, China;
3. Safety, Environment, Quality Supervision & Testing Research Institute, CCDE, Guanghan, Sichuan 618000, China;
4. School of Science, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China

Received:2020-05-23 Published:2020-12-21

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 海洋平台设备维修管理中存在高危设备重要度及分类不清、维修方法不合理的问题，造成设备"维修过剩"或"维修不足"，维修成本高昂，甚至导致重大事故和经济损失等情况。综合考虑海洋平台设备特征、故障模式及管理要求等，确定出10项重要度影响因素，制定出10项重要度评价指标及评分标准，实现定性描述定量转化；采用层次分析法和Monte Carlo仿真方法，提出了海洋平台设备重要度评价方法，定量化评价设备重要度，并有效消除评分时的主观化影响；基于重要度累积频率，将设备分为3类，并分类建立维修逻辑决策图，实现基于重要度的设备维修决策。以井控系统为例，定量评价出其各个设备重要度，并进行科学分类，进而决策出其各自维修方法，有效验证了该方法的可行性。该研究可为油田企业建立科学、完善的设备完整性管理体系提供技术支持。

关键词: 重要度评价, 层次分析法, Monte Carlo仿真, 维修决策, 海洋平台设备

Abstract: In the maintenance management of offshore platform equipment, the importance and classification of high-risk equipment are unclear, and the maintenance methods are unreasonable, resulting in equipment "maintenance excess" or "maintenance lack", high maintenance costs, and even leading to major accidents and economic losses. With comprehensive consideration of the characteristics of the offshore platform equipment, failure mode and impact and management requirements, etc., determine its 10 important factors, formulate 10 important evaluation indicators and scoring standards, and achieve qualitative description and quantitative conversion. AHP and Monte Carlo simulation methods are used to propose an evaluation method for the importance of offshore platform equipment, which quantitatively evaluates the importance of equipment and effectively eliminates the subjective impact of scoring. Based on the percentage of the cumulative frequency of importance, the equipment is divided into three categories, and the maintenance logic decision diagram is established by classification, which realizes the equipment maintenance decision based on the importance. Taking the well control system as an example, the importance of each equipment was quantitatively evaluated and scientifically classified, and then their respective maintenance methods were determined, which effectively verified the feasibility of the method. The research can provide technical support for oilfield enterprises to establish a scientific and complete equipment integrity management system.

Key words: critical evaluation, AHP, Monte Carlo simulation, maintenance decisions, offshore platform equipment

中图分类号:

TE95

唐洋, 杨鑫, 敬佳佳, 张志东, 杨雁. 面向完整性管理的海洋平台高危设备维修决策[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(6): 97-106.

TANG Yang, YANG Xin, JING Jiajia, ZHANG Zhidong, YANG Yan. Maintenance Decision of High-risk Equipment of Offshore Platform in Integrity Management[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2020, 42(6): 97-106.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2020.05.23.01

http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/Y2020/V42/I6/97

参考文献

[1] 许涛,赵军凯,朱宪,等. 基于风险分析的FPSO资产完整性管理[J]. 安全与环境工程, 2009, 16(6):85-87. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-1556.2009.06.022 XU Tao, ZHAO Junkai, ZHU Xian, et al. FPSO asset integrity management based on risk analysis[J]. Safety and Environmental Engineering, 2009, 16(6):85-87. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-1556.2009.06.022
[2] 董绍华,韩忠晨,费凡,等. 输油气站场完整性管理与关键技术应用研究[J]. 天然气工业, 2013, 33(12):117-123. doi:10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2013.12.018 DONG Shaohua, HAN Zhongchen, FEI Fan, et al. Integrity management of oil & gas transmission stations and the related core technologies[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2013, 33(12):117-123. doi:10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2013.12.018
[3] 冯耀荣,韩礼红,张福祥,等. 油气井管柱完整性技术研究进展与展望[J]. 天然气工业,2014,34(11):73-81. doi:10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2014.11.010 FENG Yaorong, HAN Lihong, ZHANG Fuxiang, et al. Research progress and prospect of oil and gas well tubing string integrity technology[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34(11):73-81. doi:10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2014.11.010
[4] 贾照庆. 基于RCM的石油化工设备可靠性维修管理研究[D]. 武汉:华中科技大学, 2014. JIA Zhaoqing. Research on reliability maintenance management of petrochemical equipment based on RCM[D]. Wuhan:Huazhong University of Science and Technolog, 2014.
[5] 郭丽杰,高金吉,杨剑锋,等. 石化旋转机械维修方式优化[J]. 机械设计, 2009, 26(11):61-65. GUO Lijie, GAO Jinji, YANG Jianfeng, et al. Maintenance mode optimization of petrochemical rotary machinery[J]. Journal of Machine Design, 2009, 26(11):61-65.
[6] 倪爱伟,翁刚,阎骏,等. 基于RCM II的石油设备管理策略[J]. 石油机械, 2006, 34(11):68-71. doi:10.16082/j.cnki.issn.1001-4578.2006.11.025 NI Aiwei, WENG Gang, YAN Jun, et al. Based RCM II oil equipment management strateg[J]. Petroleum Machinery, 2006, 34(11):68-71. doi:10.16082/j.cnki.issn.1001-4578.2006.11.025
[7] BEVILACQUA M, BRAGLIA M, GABBRIELLI R. Monte Carlo simulation approach for a modified FMECA in a power plant[J]. Quality and Reliability Engineering International, 2000, 16(4):313-324. doi:10.1002/1099-1638(200007/08)16:4<313::AID-QRE434>3.0.CO;2-U
[8] HIJES F C G D L, CARTAGENA J J R. Maintenance strategy based on a multicriterion classification of equipments[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2006, 91(4):444-451. doi:10.1016/j.ress.2005.03.001
[9] 张毅. 基于重要度划分的设备维修方式决策[J]. 兵工自动化, 2006, 24(6):23-24. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1576.2005.06.011 ZHANG Yi. Maintenance manner decision-making for equipment based on partitioning importance[J]. Ordnance Industry Automation, 2006, 24(6):23-24. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-1576.2005.06.011
[10] 高萍,吴甦. 基于蒙特卡罗方法的设备维修决策模型[J]. 系统仿真学报, 2007, 19(22):5112-5114. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-731X.2007.22.004 GAO Ping, WU Su. Maintenance decision model for equipment based on Monte Carlo method[J]. Journal of System Simulation, 2007, 19(22):5112-5114. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-731X.2007.22.004
[11] 董玉亮,顾煜炯,杨昆. 基于蒙特卡洛模拟的发电厂设备重要度分析[J]. 中国电机工程学报, 2003, 23(8):201205. doi:10.3321/j.issn:0258-8013.2003.08.041 DONG Yuliang, GU Yujiong, YANG Kun. Criticality analysis on equipment in power plant based on Monte Carlo simulation[J]. Proceedings of the CSEE, 2003, 23(8):201-205. doi:10.3321/j.issn:0258-8013.2003.08.041
[12] 王宝,刘青,王彬,等. 基于重要度的电弧炉炼钢系统维修决策[J]. 中南大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 44(1):19-29. WANG Bao, LIU Qing, WANG Bin, et al. Maintenance decision-making for EAF steelmaking system based on criticality[J]. Journal of Central South University (Science and Technology), 2013, 44(1):19-29.
[13] 唐洋. 基于RCM海洋平台动设备完整性管理关键技术研究[D]. 成都:西南石油大学, 2016. TANG Yang. Research on key technology of asset integrity management for mechanical equipment on theoffshore platform based on RCM[D]. Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University, 2016.
[14] TANG Yang, LIU Qingyou, JING Jiajia, et al. A framework for identification of maintenance significant items in reliability centered maintenance[J]. Energy, 2017, 118:1295-1303. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.11.011
[15] LIN Yanhui, LI Yanfu, ENRICO Z. A framework for modeling and optimizing maintenance in systems considering epistemic uncertainty and degradation dependence based on PDMPs[J]. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 2018, 14(1):210-220. doi:10.1109/TII.2017.2743820
[16] 张艳丽,赵建平. 设备重要度的模糊综合评判[J]. 南京化工大学学报(自然科学版), 1999, 21(6):40-43. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7627.1999.06.009 ZHANG Yanli, ZHAO Jianping. Fuzzy synthetic evaluation of equipment importance[J]. Journal of Nanjing University of Chemical Technology, 1999, 21(6):40-43. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-7627.1999.06.009
[17] 和媛媛,周德群,王强. 基于模糊判断矩阵的一致性调整方法[J]. 系统工程与电子技术, 2008, 30(11):2186-2189. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1001-506X.2008.11.036 HE Yuanyuan, ZHOU Dequn, WANG Qiang. Method for regulating consistency of fuzzy preference[J]. Systems Engineering and Electronics, 2008, 30(11):2186-2189. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1001-506X.2008.11.036
[18] ARUNRAJ N S, MAITI J. Risk-based maintenance policy selection using AHP and goal programming[J]. Safety Science, 2010, 48(2):238-247. doi:10.1016/j.ssci.2009.09.005
[19] 丁文飞,黄子俊,崔晓梦. 基于Monte Carlo仿真的复杂装备维修决策[J]. 空军雷达学院学报, 2010, 24(2):94-97. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8691.2010.02.005 DING Wenfei, HUANG Zijun, CUI Xiaomeng. Decisionmaking of complicated equipment maintenance based on Monte Carlo simulation[J]. Journal of Air Force Radar Academy, 2010, 24(2):94-97. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8691.2010.02.005
[20] SAATY T L. Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process[J]. International Journal of Services Sciences, 2008, 1(1):83-98.
[21] AZIZI A, FATHI K. Selection of optimum maintenance strategies based on a fuzzy analytic hierarchy process[J]. Management Science Letters, 2014, 4(5):893-898. doi:10.5267/j.msl.2014.3.028
[22] MARSEGUERRA M, ZIO E. Optimizing maintenance and repair policies via a combination of genetic algorithms and Monte Carlo simulation[J]. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 2000, 68(1):69-83. doi:10.1016/s0951-8320(00)00007-7
[23] TANG Yang, ZOU Zhengwei, JING Jiajia, et al. A framework for making maintenance decisions for oil and gas drilling and production equipment[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering, 2015, 26(1):1050-1058. doi:10.1016/j.jngse.2015.07.038
[24] ETI M C, OGAJI S O T, PROBERt S D. Reducing the cost of preventive maintenance (PM) through adopting a proactive reliability-focused culture[J]. Applied Energy, 2006, 83(11):1235-1248. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2006.01.002
[25] KYRIAKIDIS E G, DIMITRAKOS T D. Optimal preventive maintenance of a production system with an intermediate buffer[J]. European Journal of Operational Research, 2006, 168(1):86-99. doi:10.1016/j.ejor.2004.01.052
[26] 李玉军,任美鹏,李相方,等. 新疆油田钻井井喷风险分级及井控管理[J]. 中国安全生产科学技术, 2012, 8(7):113-117. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-193X.2012.07.022 LI Yujun, REN Meipeng, LI Xiangfang, et al. Risk ranking and well control measures of drilling blowout in Xinjiang Oilfield[J]. Journal of Safety Science and Technology, 2012, 8(7):113-117. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-193X.2012.07.022

面向完整性管理的海洋平台高危设备维修决策

Maintenance Decision of High-risk Equipment of Offshore Platform in Integrity Management

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 6

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	熊德明1，2 *，张明峰1，吴陈君1，2，妥进才1. 海相碳酸盐烃源岩生烃潜力模糊评价方法[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 37(4): 41-50.
[2]	梁政1，董超群1，田家林1，余笃军2，马科笃2. 层次分析法确定压缩机整体评价部件权重[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 36(5): 176-184.
[3]	徐慧1，林承焰1，孙彬2，宋新利3，曲丽丽1. 低渗透油藏分层动用状况判别方法[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 35(4): 95-100.
[4]	刘刚金业权李峰喻海霞. 层次分析法在井控风险可控诱因分析中的应用 [J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 33(2): 137-141.
[5]	谢祥俊邱全锋鲁柳利. 油藏经营管理综合评价的层次分析方法[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 31(3): 150-153.
[6]	钟仪华王昱江茂泽. 求解多目标线性规划问题的内点新算法 [J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2000, 22(4): 80-83.