J4 ›› 2016, Vol. 1 ›› Issue (11): 38-43.DOI: 10. 3969 / j. issn. 2096-2266.

• 语言学-文学 • 上一篇    下一篇

美学大讨论前期“实践”概念的意义流变分析

  

  1. (云南大学文学院,昆明650091)
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-21 修回日期:2016-10-05 出版日期:2016-11-15 发布日期:2016-11-15
  • 作者简介:邢研,博士研究生,主要从事美学原理研究.

An Analysis of Meaning Transition on The Early Debate of Aesthetics "Practice" Concept

  1. (College of Chinese Language and Literature, Yunnan University, Kunming 650091, China)
  • Received:2016-06-21 Revised:2016-10-05 Online:2016-11-15 Published:2016-11-15

摘要:

实践美学发端于五六十年代掀起的第一次“美学大讨论”,但在1956年至1958年的美学大讨论前期,“社会性”作为实
践的基础与归宿,实际上遮盖了“实践”概念本身的意义。李泽厚、蒋孔阳都在这种遮蔽中,使自身这一时期的理论最终偏离了
“实践”概念。与之相较,朱光潜虽然没有直接阐述“实践”概念,但却具有一种实践论的趋向。

关键词: 实践, 客观社会性, 美学大讨论

Abstract:

Practice aesthetics has originated in 1950s and 1960s with the first "Great Aesthetics Discussion" as the symbol. But at
the beginning of the aesthetics of big discussion from 1956 to 1958, the "social", as the basis of practice and the end-result, actually
concealed the meaning of the "practice" concept itself. Li Zehou, Jiang Kongyang, who were in the concealment which made their own
theory finally diverge from the concept of "practice" in this period. However, comparing with them, Zhu Guangqian, who hasn't
narrated directly the concept of "practice", had a tendency of the "practice" theory.

Key words: practice, objective social, aesthetic discussion

中图分类号: