常压页岩气层压裂液损害的亚临界或超临界水修复思路与机理

doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2024.09.11.01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 常压页岩气地层能量弱，压后液相滞留易引发储层损害，加速单井产量递减，降低采收率。以渝东南常压页岩气为研究对象，基于压裂液损害机理，阐释了解堵增渗思路，进而提出页岩气层压裂液损害的亚临界或超临界水修复思路，将压后大量滞留于基质纳米孔和微裂缝的液相转化为亚临界或超临界水，提高水相流动性，并在水力裂缝周围溶孔促缝，提升气体流动能力。该方法充分考虑压后页岩气藏工程地质特征，可行性强。通过室内实验定量表征了亚临界或超临界水对页岩的溶孔促缝效果，可产生大量亚微米—微米级粒内和粒间溶蚀孔缝，孔隙度和渗透率大幅提升。论文揭示了该方法缓解压后页岩气藏水相圈闭损害的机理，包括高温热致裂和化学溶蚀作用。从与水力压裂产生协同效应和绿色低碳开发两方面，展望了该方法的矿场应用前景。

关键词: 常压页岩气, 滞留压裂液, 储层保护, 多尺度, 孔隙结构, 亚临界或超临界水

Abstract: The weak formation energy and retained fracturing fluid in the normal-pressure gas shale formation tend to cause formation damage, resulting in a rapid decline in the production of shale gas wells and low ultimate recovery after hydraulic fracturing. In this research, the normal-pressure shale gas formation in southeast Chongqing is considered as the research object. A scientific conception of relieving fracturing fluid damage by subcritical or supercritical water stimulation is innovatively proposed after clarifying the formation damage mechanisms of fracturing fluid invasion and the solution to relievie such formation damage. This method can improve the aqueous phase mobility and the gas flow capacity in shale matrix. The engineering and geological characteristics of shale gas reservoirs after hydraulic fracturing are considered, so the scientific conception is qualified as practical. Furthermore, dissolving minerals/organic matter and inducing fractures in the shale matrix via sub-and supercritical water remediation are investigated through experiments. The results show that the porosity and permeability of shale samples are greatly enhanced due to a large number of submicron-micron intragranular and interparticle dissolution pores generated. A high-temperature thermophysical effect and a subcritical or supercritical water catalytic oxidative dissolution effect are considered as the main mechanisms of relieving aqueous phase trapping damage in a shale gas reservoir. The application prospect of subcritical or supercritical water remediation is forecasted from the aspects of synergizing with hydraulic fracturing and the green and low-carbon concept in shale gas development.

Key words: normal-pressure shale gas, retained fracturing fluid, formation damage control, multiscale, pore structure, subcritical or supercritical water

中图分类号:

TE377

陈明君, 李佩松, 康毅力, 陈掌星, 游利军, 颜茂凌. 常压页岩气层压裂液损害的亚临界或超临界水修复思路与机理[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2026, 48(3): 53-67.

CHEN Mingjun, LI Peisong, KANG Yili, CHEN Zhangxing, YOU Lijun, YAN Maoling. The Remediation Mechanism of Subcritical or Supercritical Water for Fracturing Fluid Damage in Normal-pressure Shale Gas Formation[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2026, 48(3): 53-67.

参考文献

[1] 国土资源部油气资源战略研究中心. 全国页岩气资源潜力调查评价及有利区优选[M]. 北京:科学出版社， 2016. The Oil and Gas Resources Strategic Research Center of the Ministry of Land and Resources. National survey and evaluation of shale gas resource potential and selection of favorable areas[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2016.
[2] 云露，高玉巧，高全芳. 渝东南地区常压页岩气勘探开发进展及下步攻关方向[J]. 石油实验地质， 2023， 45（6）: 1078-1088. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2023061078 YUN Lu, GAO Yuqiao, GAO Quanfang. Progress and research direction of normal-pressure shale gas exploration and development in southeastern Chongqing[J]. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 2023, 45(6): 1078-1088. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2023061078
[3] 吴裕根，门相勇，娄钰，等. “十三五”以来四川盆地天然气产业发展成效及前景展望[J]. 天然气工业， 2022， 42（12）: 145-151. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2022.12.015 WU Yugen, MEN Xiangyong, LOU Yu, et al. Natural gas development in the Sichuan Basin: Achievements since the 13th Five-Year Plan and prospects[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(12): 145-151. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2022.12.015
[4] 蒋恕，李醇，陈国辉，等. 中美常压页岩气赋存状态及其对可动性与产量的影响——以彭水和阿巴拉契亚为例[J]. 油气藏评价与开发， 2022， 12（3）: 399-406. doi: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2022.03.001 JIANG Shu, LI Chun, CHEN Guohui, et al. Occurrence of normally-pressured shale gas in China and the United States and their effects on mobility and production: A case study of southeast Sichuan Basin and Appalachia Basin[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2022, 12(3): 399-406. doi: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2022.03.001
[5] 何希鹏，何贵松，高玉巧，等. 常压页岩气勘探开发关键技术进展及攻关方向[J]. 天然气工业， 2023， 43（6）: 1-14. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2023.06.001 HE Xipeng, HE Guisong, GAO Yuqiao, et al. Progress in and research direction of key technologies for normal-pressure shale gas exploration and development[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2023, 43(6): 1-14. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2023.06.001
[6] 蒋恕，张天宇，郭彤楼，等. 川东南下志留统与Appalachian泥盆系典型常压页岩气藏富集特征对比[J]. 地球科学， 2023， 48（1）: 77-91. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2022.356 JIANG Shu, ZHANG Tianyu, GUO Tonglou, et al. Comparison of enrichment characteristics of typical normally-pressured shale gas reservoirs in lower silurian shale in southeastern Sichuan Basin and devonian shales in Appalachian Basin[J]. Earth Science, 2023, 48(1): 77-91. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2022.356
[7] 卢拥军，王海燕，管保山，等. 海相页岩压裂液低返排率成因[J]. 天然气工业， 2017， 37（7）: 46-51. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2017.07.007 LU Yongjun, WANG Haiyan, GUAN Baoshan, et al. Reasons for the low flowback rates of fracturing fluids in marine shale[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2017, 37(7): 46-51. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2017.07.007
[8] 何希鹏，卢比，何贵松，等. 渝东南构造复杂区常压页岩气生产特征及开发技术政策[J]. 石油与天然气地质， 2021， 42（1）: 224-240. doi: 10.11743/ogg20210119 HE Xipeng, LU Bi, HE Guisong, et al. Production characteristics and optimized development technologies for normal-pressure shale gas in the structurally complex areas of southeastern Chongqing[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2021, 42(1): 224-240. doi: 10.11743/ogg20210119
[9] 周德华，何希鹏，张培先. 渝东南常压与高压页岩气典型差异性分析及效益开发对策[J]. 石油实验地质， 2023， 45（6）: 1109-1120. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2023061109 ZHOU Dehua, HE Xipeng, ZHANG Peixian. Typical difference analysis and benefit-oriented development countermeasures of normal and high pressure shale gas in southeastern Chongqing[J]. Petroleum Geology & Experiment, 2023, 45(6): 1109-1120. doi: 10.11781/sysydz2023061109
[10] DEHGHANPOUR H, ZUBAIR H A, CHHABRA A, et al. Liquid intake of organic shales[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2012, 26(9): 5750-5758. doi: 10.1021/ef3009794
[11] 刘洪林，王红岩. 中国南方海相页岩超低含水饱和度特征及超压核心区选择指标[J]. 天然气工业， 2013， 33（7）: 140-144. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2013.07.025 LIU Honglin, WANG Hongyan. Ultra-low water saturation characteristics and the identification of overpressured play fairways of marine shales in south China[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2013, 33(7): 140-144. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2013.07.025
[12] 彭勇民，龙胜祥，何希鹏，等. 彭水地区常压页岩气储层特征及有利区评价[J]. 油气藏评价与开发， 2020， 10（5）: 12-19. doi: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2020.05.002 PENG Yongmin, LONG Shengxiang, HE Xipeng, et al. Characteristics of normal-pressure shale gas reservoirs and evaluation of its favorable areas in Pengshui[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2020, 10(5): 12-19. doi: 10.13809/j.cnki.cn32-1825/te.2020.05.002
[13] 张磊，康钦军，姚军，等. 页岩压裂中压裂液返排率低的孔隙尺度模拟与解释[J]. 科学通报， 2014， 59（32）: 3197-3203. doi: 10.1360/N972014-00461 ZHANG Lei, KANG Qinjun, YAO Jun, et al. The explanation of low recovery of fracturing fluid in shale hydraulic fracturing by pore-scale simulation[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2014, 59(32): 3197-3203. doi: 10.1360/N972014-00461
[14] 孙金声，刘克松，金家锋，等. 中低熟页岩油原位转化技术研究现状及发展趋势[J]. 钻采工艺， 2023， 46（6）: 1-7. doi: 10.3969/J.ISSN.1006-768X.2023.06.01 SUN Jinsheng, LIU Kesong, JIN Jiafeng, et al. Research status and development trend of in-situ catalytic conversion technology for medium-low maturity shale oil[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2023, 46(6): 1-7. doi: 10.3969/J.ISSN.1006-768X.2023.06.01
[15] 王光付，李凤霞，王海波，等. 四川盆地不同类型页岩气压裂难点和对策[J]. 石油与天然气地质， 2023， 44（6）: 1378-1392. doi: 10.11743/ogg20230604 WANG Guangfu, LI Fengxia, WANG Haibo, et al. Difficulties and countermeasures for fracturing of various shale gas reservoirs in the Sichuan Basin[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2023, 44(6): 1378-1392. doi: 10.11743/ogg20230604
[16] MENG Fanyi, YAO Chuanjin, ZHANG Hexing, et al. Experimental investigation on the pyrolysis process and product distribution characteristics of organic-rich shale via supercritical water[J]. Fuel, 2023, 333: 126338. doi: 10.1016/j.fuel.2022.126338
[17] LIANG Xinping, ZHAO Qiuyang, DONG Yu, et al. Experimental investigation on supercritical water gasification of organic-rich shale with low maturity for syngas production[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2021, 35(9): 7657-7665. doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c04140
[18] 郑豪，鱼涛，屈撑囤，等. 超临界水的基本特性及应用进展[J]. 化工技术与开发， 2020， 49（2）: 62-66. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9905.2020.02.017 ZHENG Hao, YU Tao, QU Chengdun, et al. Basic characteristics and application progress of supercritical water[J]. Technology & Development of Chemical Industry, 2020, 49(2): 62-66. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9905.2020.02.017
[19] ENGELDER T, CATHLES L M, BRYNDZIA L T. The fate of residual treatment water in gas shale[J]. Journal of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources, 2014, 7: 33-48. doi: 10.1016/j.juogr.2014.03.002
[20] ALKOUH A, WATTENBARGER R A. New advances in shale reservoir analysis using flowback data[C]. SPE 165721-MS, 2013. doi: 10.2118/165721-MS
[21] LAN Qing, XU Mingxiang, DEHGHANPOUR H, et al. Advances in understanding wettability of tight and shale gas formations[C]. SPE 170969-MS, 2014. doi: 10.2118/170969-MS
[22] 方朝合，黄志龙，王巧智，等. 富含气页岩储层超低含水饱和度成因及意义[J]. 天然气地球科学， 2014， 25（3）: 471-476. FANG Chaohe, HUANG Zhilong, WANG Qiaozhi, et al. Cause and significance of the ultra-low water saturation in gas-enriched shale reservoir[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2014, 25(3): 471-476.
[23] 李春颖，张志全，林飞，等. 压裂液在页岩储层中的滞留与吸收初步探索[J]. 科技通报， 2016， 32（8）: 31-35. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7119.2016.08.008 LI Chunying, ZHANG Zhiquan, LIN Fei, et al. Initial exploration of fracturing fluid retention in shale reservoirs[J]. Bulletin of Science and Technology, 2016, 32(8): 31-35. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1001-7119.2016.08.008
[24] 高树生，胡志明，郭为，等. 页岩储层吸水特征与返排能力[J]. 天然气工业， 2013， 33（12）: 71-76. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2013.12.010 GAO Shusheng, HU Zhiming, GUO Wei, et al. Water absorption characteristics of gas shale and the fracturing fluid flowback capacity[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2013, 33(12): 71-76. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2013.12.010
[25] 梁大川，李健，杨柳. 泥页岩水化的定量分析[J]. 钻井液与完井液， 1999， 16（2）: 11-13. LIANG Dachuan, LI Jian, YANG Liu. Quantitative analysis of shale hydration[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 1999, 16(2): 11-13.
[26] CHENG Yueming. Impact of water dynamics in fractures on the performance of hydraulically fractured wells in gas-shale reservoirs[J]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 2012, 51(2): 143-151. doi: 10.2118/127863-PA
[27] 薛华庆，周尚文，蒋雅丽，等. 水化作用对页岩微观结构与物性的影响[J]. 石油勘探与开发， 2018， 45（6）: 1075-1081. doi: 10.11698/PED.2018.06.16 XUE Huaqing, ZHOU Shangwen, JIANG Yali, et al. Effects of hydration on the microstructure and physical properties of shale[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(6): 1075-1081. doi: 10.11698/PED.2018.06.16
[28] 康毅力，白佳佳，李相臣，等. 水—岩作用对富有机质页岩应力敏感性的影响——以渝东南地区龙马溪组页岩为例[J]. 油气藏评价与开发， 2019， 9（5）: 54-62. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1426.2019.05.007 KANG Yili, BAI Jiajia, LI Xiangchen, et al. Influence of water-rock interaction on stress sensitivity of organic-rich shales: A case study from Longmaxi formation in the southeast area of Chongqing[J]. Reservoir Evaluation and Development, 2019, 9(5): 54-62. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.2095-1426.2019.05.007
[29] LIU Xiangjun, ZENG Wei, LIANG Lixi, et al. Experimental study on hydration damage mechanism of shale from the Longmaxi Formation in southern Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Petroleum, 2016, 2(1): 54-60. doi: 10.1016/j.petlm.2016.01.002
[30] LU Yunhu, LI Yucheng, WU Yongkang, et al. Characterization of shale softening by large volume-based nanoindentation[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2020, 53(3): 1393-1409. doi: 10.1007/s00603-019-01981-8
[31] LI Ning, JIN Zhijun, WANG Haibo, et al. Investigation into shale softening induced by water/CO₂-rock interaction[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2023, 161: 105299. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrmms.2022.105299
[32] 康毅力，赖哲涵，陈明君，等. 基于压力衰减法的页岩气体扩散系数应力敏感性实验[J]. 天然气工业， 2022， 42（2）: 59-70. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2022.02.007 KANG Yili, LAI Zhehan, CHEN Mingjun, et al. Stress sensitivity experiments of shale gas diffusion coefficients based on the pressure decay method[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(2): 59-70. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2022.02.007
[33] 胡志明，穆英，顾兆斌，等. 渗吸效应对页岩气赋存状态的影响规律[J]. 天然气工业， 2020， 40（5）: 66-71. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2020.05.008 HU Zhiming, MU Ying, GU Zhaobin, et al. Law of imbibition effect on shale gas occurrence state[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2020, 40(5): 66-71. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2020.05.008
[34] CHALMERS G R L, BUSTIN R M. Lower cretaceous gas shales in northeastern British Columbia, Part II: Evaluation of regional potential gas resources[J]. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 2008, 56(1): 22-61. doi: 10.2113/gscpgbull.56.1.22
[35] MIAO Yanan, ZHAO Chaojie, WU Keliu, et al. Analysis of production prediction in shale reservoirs: Influence of water film in inorganic matter[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2019, 63: 1-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2019.01.002
[36] LAI Fengpeng, LI Zhiping, WANG Yining. Impact of water blocking in fractures on the performance of hydraulically fractured horizontal wells in tight gas reservoir[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2017, 156: 134-141. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2017.05.002
[37] 申颍浩，葛洪魁，宿帅，等. 页岩气储层的渗吸动力学特性与水锁解除潜力[J]. 中国科学（物理学力学天文学）， 2017， 47（11）: 88-98. doi: 10.1360/SSPMA2016-00538 SHEN Yinghao, GE Hongkui, SU Shuai, et al. Imbibition characteristic of shale gas formation and water-block removal capability[J]. Scientia Sinica Physica, Mechanica & Astronomica, 2017, 47(11): 88-98. doi: 10.1360/SSPMA2016-00538
[38] 张涛，李相方，王永辉，等. 页岩储层特殊性质对压裂液返排率和产能的影响[J]. 天然气地球科学， 2017， 28（6）: 828-838. doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2017.05.003 ZHANG Tao, LI Xiangfang, WANG Yonghui, et al. Study on the effect of gas-shale reservoir special properties on the fracturing fluid recovery efficiency and production performance[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 28(6): 828-838. doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2017.05.003
[39] 康毅力，陈强，游利军，等. 页岩气藏水相圈闭损害实验研究及控制对策——以四川盆地东部龙马溪组露头页岩为例[J]. 油气地质与采收率， 2014， 21（6）: 87-91. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9603.2014.06.022 KANG Yili, CHEN Qiang, YOU Lijun, et al. Laboratory investigation of water phase trapping damage in shale gas reservoir: A case of Longmaxi shale in the eastern Sichuan Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2014, 21(6): 87-91. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1009-9603.2014.06.022
[40] CHEN Mingjun, LAI Zhehan, KANG Yili, et al. Impact of aqueous phase trapping on mass transfer in shales with multiscale channels[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2020, 34(9): 10724-10739. doi: 10.1021/acs.energyfuels.0c01672
[41] AL-AMERI A, GAMADI T, ISPAS I. Evaluation of the near fracture face formation damage caused by the spontaneously imbibed fracturing fluid in unconventional gas reservoirs[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2018, 171: 23-36. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2018.07.021
[42] 康毅力，张晓怡，游利军，等. 页岩气藏自然返排缓解水相圈闭损害实验研究[J]. 天然气地球科学， 2017， 28（6）: 819-827. doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2017.05.009 KANG Yili, ZHANG Xiaoyi, YOU Lijun, et al. The experimental research on spontaneous flowback relieving aqueous phase trapping damage in shale gas reservoirs[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 28(6): 819-827. doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2017.05.009
[43] YUAN Bin, WANG Yongqing, WEI Nan. The effects of fracturing fluid retention on permeability of shale reservoirs[J]. Energy Procedia, 2019, 158: 5934-5939. doi: 10.1016/j.egypro.2019.01.529
[44] 康毅力，杨斌，李相臣，等. 页岩水化微观作用力定量表征及工程应用[J]. 石油勘探与开发， 2017， 44（2）: 301-308. doi: 10.11698/PED.2017.02.17 KANG Yili, YANG Bin, LI Xiangchen, et al. Quantitative characterization of micro forces in shale hydration and field applications[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2017, 44(2): 301-308. doi: 10.11698/PED.2017.02.17
[45] 刘向君，熊健，梁利喜. 龙马溪组硬脆性页岩水化实验研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报（自然科学版）， 2016， 38（3）: 178-186. doi: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2014.04.10.05 LIU Xiangjun, XIONG Jian, LIANG Lixi. Hydration experiment of hard brittle shale of the Longmaxi Formation[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2016, 38(3): 178-186. doi: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2014.04.10.05
[46] BAI Jiajia, KANG Yili, CHEN Zhangxing, et al. Changes in retained fracturing fluid properties and their effect on shale mechanical properties[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2020, 75: 103163. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103163
[47] CURTIS J. Fractured shale-gas systems[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2002, 86(11): 91-103. doi: 10.1306/61EEDDBE-173E-11D7-8645000102C1865D
[48] 吴奇，胥云，刘玉章，等. 美国页岩气体积改造技术现状及对我国的启示[J]. 石油钻采工艺， 2011， 33（2）: 1-7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7393.2011.02.001 WU Qi, XU Yun, LIU Yuzhang, et al. The current situation of stimulated reservoir volume for shale in U.S. and its inspiration to China[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2011, 33(2): 1-7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7393.2011.02.001
[49] 任岚，舒亮，胡永全，等. 纳米尺度页岩储层的气体流动行为分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报（自然科学版）， 2014， 36（5）: 111-116. doi: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2014.01.07.06 REN Lan, SHU Liang, HU Yongquan, et al. Analysis of gas flow behavior in nano-scale shale gas reservoir[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2014, 36(5): 111-116. doi: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2014.01.07.06
[50] SANDLER S I. Temperature dependence of the Knudsen permeability[J]. Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Fundamentals, 1972, 11(3): 424-427. doi: 10.1021/i160043a028
[51] MOGHADDAM R N, JAMIOLAHMADY M. Fluid transport in shale gas reservoirs: Simultaneous effects of stress and slippage on matrix permeability[J]. International Journal of Coal Geology, 2016, 163: 87-99. doi: 10.1016/j.coal.2016.06.018
[52] ALHARTHY N, KOBAISI M A, TORCUK M A, et al. Physics and modeling of gas flow in shale reservoirs[C]. SPE 161893, 2012. doi: 10.2118/161893-MS
[53] 李静海，黄文来. 探索介科学:竞争中的协调原理[M]. 北京:科学出版社， 2014. LI Jinghai, HUANG Wenlai. Towards mesoscience: The principle of compromise in competition[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2014.
[54] 游利军，谢本彬，杨建，等. 页岩气井压裂液返排对储层裂缝的损害机理[J]. 天然气工业， 2018， 38（12）: 61-69. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2018.12.007 YOU Lijun, XIE Benbin, YANG Jian, et al. Mechanism of fracture damage induced by fracturing fluid flowback in shale gas reservoirs[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2018, 38(12): 61-69. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2018.12.007
[55] 何治亮，聂海宽，胡东风，等. 深层页岩气有效开发中的地质问题——以四川盆地及其周缘五峰组—龙马溪组为例[J]. 石油学报， 2020， 41（4）: 379-391. doi: 10.7623/syxb202004001 HE Zhiliang, NIE Haikuan, HU Dongfeng, et al. Geological problems in the effective development of deep shale gas: a case study of Upper Ordovician Wufeng-Lower Silurian Longmaxi Formations in Sichuan Basin and its periphery[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2020, 41(4): 379-391. doi: 10.7623/syxb202004001
[56] 关清卿，宁平，谷俊杰. 亚/超临界水技术与原理[M]. 北京:冶金工业出版社， 2014. GUAN Qingqing, NING Ping, GU Junjie. Sub/supercritical water technology and principle[M]. Beijing: Metallurgical Industry Press, 2014.
[57] KANG Yili, CHEN Mingjun, CHEN Zhangxing, et al. Investigation of formation heat treatment to enhance the multiscale gas transport ability of shale[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2016, 35: 265-275. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2016.08.058
[58] 邓孙华. 近临界水对块状油页岩中有机质的提取研究[D]. 长春:吉林大学， 2013. DENG Sunhua. Sub-critical water extraction of organic matter from oil shale lumps[D]. Changchun: Jilin University, 2013.
[59] HUELSMAN C M, SAVAGE P E. Intermediates and kinetics for phenol gasification in supercritical water[J]. Physical Chemistry Chemical Physics, 2012, 14(8): 2900-2910. doi: 10.1039/c2cp23910h
[60] SKARMOUTSOS I, GUARDIA E, SAMIOS J. Local structural fluctuations, hydrogen bonding and structural transitions in supercritical water[J]. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 2017, 130: 156-164. doi: 10.1016/j.supflu.2017.08.004
[61] 赵光明，刘玉存，柴涛，等. 连续型超临界水氧化系统出水酸碱性分流试验研究[J]. 安全与环境学报， 2016， 16（4）: 297-301. doi: 10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2016.04.059 ZHAO Guangming, LIU Yucun, CHAI Tao, et al. Experiment for separating the effluent water with different acidic and alkaline mixtures in continuous supercritical water oxidation system[J]. Journal of Safety and Environment, 2016, 16(4): 297-301. doi: 10.13637/j.issn.1009-6094.2016.04.059
[62] SAVAGE P E. Organic chemical reactions in supercritical water[J]. Chemical Reviews, 1999, 99(2): 603-622. doi: 10.1021/cr9700989
[63] CONNOLLY J F. Solubility of hydrocarbons in water near the critical solution temperatures[J]. Journal of Chemical & Engineering Data, 1966, 11(1): 13-16. doi: 10.1021/je60028a003
[64] ECKERT C A, CHANDLER K. Tuning fluid solvents for chemical reactions[J]. The Journal of Supercritical Fluids, 1998, 13(1): 187-195. doi: 10.1016/S0896-8446(98)00051-5
[65] 邹才能，赵群，董大忠，等. 页岩气基本特征、主要挑战与未来前景[J]. 天然气地球科学， 2017， 28（12）: 1781-1796. doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2017.02.017 ZOU Caineng, ZHAO Qun, DONG Dazhong, et al. Geological characteristics, main challenges and future prospect of shale gas[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2017, 28(12): 1781-1796. doi: 10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2017.02.017
[66] 邹才能，董大忠，蔚远江，等. 海相页岩气[M]. 北京:科学出版社， 2021. ZOU Caineng, DONG Dazhong, WEI Yuanjiang, et al. Marine shale gas[M]. Beijing: Science Press, 2021.
[67] 胡素云，赵文智，侯连华，等. 中国陆相页岩油发展潜力与技术对策[J]. 石油勘探与开发， 2020， 47（4）: 819-828. doi: 10.11698/PED.2020.04.19 HU Suyun, ZHAO Wenzhi, HOU Lianhua, et al. Development potential and technical strategy of continental shale oil in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(4): 819-828. doi: 10.11698/PED.2020.04.19
[68] 李琪琪，徐尚. 海陆过渡相页岩储层研究现状与展望[J]. 地质通报， 2022， 41（8）: 1417-1429. doi: 10.12097/j.issn.1671-2552.2022.08.009 LI Qiqi, XU Shang. Research status and prospects of marine-continental transitional shale reservoirs[J]. Geological Bulletin of China, 2022, 41(8): 1417-1429. doi: 10.12097/j.issn.1671-2552.2022.08.009
[69] CHEN Mingjun, BAI Jiajia, KANG Yili, et al. Redistribution of fracturing fluid in shales and its impact on gas transport capacity[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2021, 86: 103747. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2020.103747
[70] CRAWFORD P M, BIGLARBIGI K, DAMMER A R, et al. Advances in world oil shale production technologies[C]. SPE 116570, 2008. doi: 10.2118/116570-MS
[71] CRAWFORD P, KILLEN J. New challenges and directions in oil shale development technologies. Oil shale: A solution to the liquid fuel dilemma[M]. New York: American Chemical Society, 2010.
[72] KANG Zhiqin, ZHAO Yangsheng, YANG Dong. Review of oil shale in-situ conversion technology[J]. Applied Energy, 2020, 269: 115121. doi: 10.1016/j.apenergy.2020.115121
[73] KANG Zhiqin, ZHAO Yangsheng, YANG Dong, et al. A pilot investigation of pyrolysis from oil and gas extraction from oil shale by in-situ superheated steam injection[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, 186: 106785. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106785
[74] DAMMER A R K, JAMES C, BIGLARBIGI K, et al. Secure fuels from domestic resources: The continuing evolution of America's oil shale and tar sands industries[R]. Washington, DC, USA: Institute for Clean and Secure Energy, 2007.
[75] ALPAK F O, VINK J C, GAO Guohua, et al. Techniques for effective simulation, optimization, and uncertainty quantification of the in-situ upgrading process[J]. Journal of Unconventional Oil and Gas Resources, 2013, 3-4: 1-14. doi: 10.1016/j.juogr.2013.09.001
[76] 陈明君，康毅力，游利军. 利用高温热处理提高致密储层渗透性[J]. 天然气地球科学， 2013， 24（6）: 1226-1231. CHEN Mingjun, KANG Yili, YOU Lijun. Advantages in formation heat treatment to enhance permeability in tight reservoir[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2013, 24(6): 1226-1231.
[77] ZHOU Wenda, XIE Shuyun, BAO Zhengyu, et al. Chemical compositions and distribution characteristics of cements in Longmaxi Formation Shales, southwest China[J]. Journal of Earth Science, 2019, 30(5): 879-892. doi: 10.1007/s12583-019-1013-7