J4 ›› 2011, Vol. 10 ›› Issue (8): 65-67.

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

Ceivitron暂封材料在根管治疗中的临床应用研究

  

  1. 1.大理学院附属医院,云南大理 671000;2.广东中山小榄镇陈星海医院,广东中山 528415
  • 收稿日期:2011-03-24 出版日期:2011-08-15 发布日期:2011-08-15
  • 作者简介:何丽明,主治医师,主要从事口腔内科研究.

Clinical Study on the Application of Temporary Stopping Ceivtron in Root Canal Therapy

  1. 1. Affiliated Hospital of Dali University,Dali,Yunnan 671000,China;2.Chen Xinghai Hospital,Xiaolan Town,
    Zhongshan,Guangdong 528415,China
  • Received:2011-03-24 Online:2011-08-15 Published:2011-08-15

摘要:

目的:研究根管治疗过程中3 种暂封材料的临床封闭效果。方法:选取300 颗患牙,其中单面洞150 颗,复面洞150 颗,
随机分别采用Ceivtron 暂封膏、氧化锌丁香油水门汀和牙胶条封闭1 周后观察其封闭性能。选取450 颗患牙(全部为单面洞),分成9 组,分别采用Ceivtron 暂封膏、氧化锌丁香油水门汀和牙胶条封闭3 d,1周,2周后观察其封闭性能。结果:Ceivtron 暂封膏组和氧化锌丁香油水门汀组封闭性能相当,均优于牙胶条组。但氧化锌丁香油水门汀的特殊气味不易被患者接受。结论:Ceivtron 暂封材料是临床综合效果较好的暂封材料。

关键词: Ceivtron 暂封材料, 根管治疗, 临床应用

Abstract:

Objective:To compare the clinical effects of three kinds of temporary stopping in root canal therapy. Method:Three
hundred sick teeth,including 150 with simple cavity and 150 with compound cavity,were randomly selected and sealed with Ceivtron,oxide-eugenol cement and gutta-percha. The seal effects were observed and recorded one week later. Forty hundred and fifty sick teeth(entirely simple cavity)were divided into 9 groups randomly and sealed with the above-mentioned three kinds of materials. Sealing effects were observed and recorded respectively at 3 days,one week and two weeks after operation. Result:Ceivtron and oxide-eugenol cement showed better sealing effect than gutta-percha. But the oxide-eugenol cement is not popular among patients because of its bad smell. Conclusion:The results suggested that Ceivtron may be the best choice among the three kinds of materials in root canal therapy.

Key words: ceivitron temporary stopping, root canal therapy, clinical application

中图分类号: