言语产生中同音词的心理表征：模型和证据

J4 ›› 2012, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (2): 31-35.

言语产生中同音词的心理表征：模型和证据

言语产生过程中同音词心理表征有两个假说：共同表征说和独立表征说，同音词表征假说对揭示词汇通达的途径和阶
段起着重要作用，并对同音字的研究及现代语文教学的改进有重要的指导意义。

1.杭州师范大学心理学系，杭州 310036； 2.华南师范大学心理应用研究中心，广州 510631；
3.大理学院教育科学学院，云南大理 671003

收稿日期:2011-11-10 出版日期:2012-02-15 发布日期:2012-02-15
作者简介:肖二平，讲师，主要从事语言认知心理学、民族心理学研究.
基金资助:
教育部人文社会科学重点研究基地项目（08JJOXLX269）；广东省普通高校人文社会科学重点研
究基地重大研究项目（06JDXMXLX01）；广东省自然科学基金团队资助项目（06200524）.

Hypotheses on the Mental Representation of Homophone in Speech Production

Two hypotheses on the mental representation of homophones in the process of speech production were introduced, that is,the shared representation （SR）hypothesis and the independent representation （IR）hypothesis. The homophone representation hypotheses had an important role for the approach and stage of the lexical access, and had guiding significance on researching of homophones and improving the modern language teaching.

1.Department of Psychology, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 310036, China;
2. Center for Psychological Application, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China;
3. College of Education, Dali University, Dali, Yunnan 671003, China

Received:2011-11-10 Online:2012-02-15 Published:2012-02-15

摘要/Abstract

摘要：

关键词: 同音词, 言语产生, 心理表征, 词汇通达

Abstract:

Key words: homophone, speech production, mental representation, lexical access

中图分类号:

B842.5

. 言语产生中同音词的心理表征：模型和证据[J]. J4, 2012, 11(2): 31-35.

参考文献

〔1〕彭聃龄，舒华，陈烜之. 汉语认知研究的历史和研究方法〔M〕//彭聃龄，舒华，陈烜之.汉语认知研究. 济南：
山东教育出版社，1997：3-34.
〔2〕Caramazza A，Costa A，Miozzo M，et al. The specificword frequency effect：Implications for the representation of homophones in speech production〔J〕. Journal of xperimental Psychology：Learning，Memory，and ognition，2001，27：1430-1450.
〔3〕Jescheniak J D，Levelt W J M. Word frequency effects in peech production：Retrieval of syntactic information and fphonologicalform〔J〕.JournalofExperimentalPsychology：Learning，Memory，and Cognition，1994，20：824-843.
〔4〕Dell G S. Effects of frequency and vocabulary type on ponological speech errors〔J〕. Language and Cognitive Processes，1990，5：313-349.
〔5〕Jescheniak J D，Meyer A S，Levelt W J M. Specific-word frequency is not all that counts in speech production：comments on Caramazza，Costa，et al.（2001）and new experimental data〔J〕. Journal of Experimental Psychology：Learning，Memory，and Cognition，2003，29：432-438.
〔6〕Shatzman K B，Schiller N O. The word frequency effect in picture naming：Contrasting two hypotheses using homonym pictures〔J〕. Brain and Language，2004，90：160-169.
〔7〕Levelt W J M，Roelofs A，Meyer A S. A theory of lexical access in speech production〔J〕. Brain and Behavioral Sciences，1999，22：1-75.
〔8〕Caramazza A. How many levels of processing are there in lexical access〔J〕.Cognitive Neuropsychology，1997，14（1）：177-208.
〔9〕Caramazza A，Miozzo M.The relation between syntactic and phonological knowledge in lexical access：evidence from the“tip-of-the-tongue”phenomenon〔J〕. Cognition，1997，68：309-343.
〔10〕Caramazza A，Miozzo M.More is not always better：A rsponse to Roelofs，Meyer，& Levelt〔J〕. Cognition，1998，69：231-241.
〔11〕Caramazza A，Bi Y，Costa A，et al.What determines the speed of lexical access：homophone or specific-word frequency? A reply to Jescheniak et al.（2003）〔J 〕. Journal of Experimental Psychology：Learning，Memory，and Cognition，2004，30：278-282.
〔12〕Costa A，Colome angels，Caramazza A. Lexical access in
speech production：the bilingual case〔J〕. Psicol佼gica，
2001，21：403-437.
〔13〕张清芳，杨玉芳. 言语产生中的词汇通达理论〔J〕. 心理科学进展，2003，11（1）：6-11.
〔14〕陈宝国，宁爱华. 汉字识别中的同音字效应：语音影响字形加工的证据〔J〕. 心理学探新，2005，25（4）：35-39.