J4 ›› 2016, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (2): 41-44.
Previous Articles Next Articles
Received:
Online:
Published:
Abstract:
Objective: To evaluate clinical efficacy of biological amniotic membrane transplantation and autologous limbal stem cell transplantation in the treatment of pterygium. Methods: 245 eyes in 240 cases of pterygium hospitalized were randomly divided into treatment group and control group(120 cases in each group). The treatment group received pterygium resection and biological amniotic membrane transplantation; the control group received pterygium excision combined with autologous limbal stem cell transplantation.There were 122 eyes in the treatment group, 123 eyes in the control group. Postoperative ocular conditions, corneal and conjunctival epithelial healing, patients with symptoms, relapse rates, and changes in vision were observed. Results: After a week of ocular surface assessment, 115 eyes were fine in the treatment group, accounting for 94.3%. 95 fine in the control group(77.2%). The postoperative corneal and conjunctival epithelial healing time for the treatment group was 3 to 7 days, three-day healing rate was 73.1%. The healing time for the control group was 3 to 10 days and the three-day healing rate was 53.6%. The time of the treatmentment group was significantly shorter than that of the control group; patient's rational symptom a week after was better in the treatment group than the control group. In the 24-month postoperative follow-up, the recurrence rate was 7% in the treatment group, the control was 13%.Conclusion: The postoperative ocular conditions and the rational symptoms of pterygium resection and biological amniotic membrane transplantation were better than the limbal stem cell transplantation. The overall 24-month follow-up recurrence rate was significantly lower than the control group. Disposed with SPSS12.0 software, D/F was 3, χ2 =98.45, the difference was significant(P<0.01). Obvious visual acuity improvement was rarely found, few was improved due to the elimination of the cause of pterygium corneal astigmatism, but after SPSS12.0 software processing, the degree of freedom was 2, χ2 =1.66, with no significant difference(P>0.05).
Key words: biological amnion, limbal stem cells, pterygium, transplantation
CLC Number:
R777.33
Zhu Hongfen, Wang Kaimei, Zhang Jin. Clinical Efficacy of Amniotic Membrane Transplantation Treating Pterygium[J]. J4, 2016, 15(2): 41-44.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dlxyzk/EN/
http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_dlxyzk/EN/Y2016/V15/I2/41
〔1〕刘祖国.眼表疾病学〔M〕.北京:人们卫生出版社,2003: 363. 〔2〕张厚洪,李劼,赵恳,等.翼状胬肉切除联合角膜干细胞 移植术中两种缝合方法对比研究〔J〕. 国际眼科杂志, 2014,14(2):268-269. 〔3〕张正,李银花,丁亚丽,等.干眼症的发病机制及治疗现
状〔J〕.中华眼科医学杂志,2014,10(2):106-108. 〔4〕张虹.翼状胬肉切除术后干眼病误诊病毒性角膜炎临床 分析〔J〕. 大理学院学报,2011,10(6):59-60. 〔5〕严密.眼科学〔M〕. 4版.北京:人民卫生出版社,1999:69. 〔6〕刘新.翼状胬肉的发生及角膜缘干细胞缺乏的病理研 究〔J〕.中国实用眼科杂志,2003,21(7):499-501. 〔7〕闫媛媛,刘平,王艳情,等.自体角膜缘干细胞移植与羊 膜移植治疗复发翼状胬肉疗效比较〔J〕. 中国实用医刊, 2014,41(3):87-89. 〔8〕吴林彬,赵兰爰,谭荣强,等.改良羊膜及角膜缘干细胞 移植联合MMC 治疗复发性翼状胬肉〔J〕. 国际眼科杂 志,2013,13(8):1715-1717. 〔9〕龙正勤.生物羊膜移植在翼状胬肉手术中的应用〔J〕.国 际眼科杂志,2013,13(8):1715-1720. 〔10〕关仕嫦,黄泳瑜,余秀清,等. 生物羊膜移植治疗眼化学 烧伤的临床观察〔J〕.承德医学院学报,2015,32(1): 28-30. 〔11〕李连州.生物羊膜在复发性翼状胬肉术中应用评价〔J〕. 中华眼外伤职业眼病杂志,2012,34(4):303-304. 〔12〕王峰,葛善勇,韩正杰,等.角膜缘干细胞移植与羊膜移 植治疗翼状胬肉对比观察〔J〕. 吉林医学,2011,32 (27):5635-5636.