威权领导一定会抑制员工建言行为吗？——兼论职业使命感的中介作用

doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5094.2019.12.08.01

西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (2): 27-35.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5094.2019.12.08.01

威权领导一定会抑制员工建言行为吗？——兼论职业使命感的中介作用

朱云鹃, 丁国栋

安徽大学商学院, 安徽合肥 230601

收稿日期:2019-12-08 出版日期:2020-03-01 发布日期:2020-03-01
通讯作者: 丁国栋(1994-),男(汉族),安徽阜阳人,硕士研究生,研究方向:创新管理。
作者简介:朱云鹃(1962-),女(汉族),安徽淮南人,教授,研究方向:创新管理。
基金资助:
安徽省人文社会科学课题“城市精细化管理与品质合肥建设研究”（K230946038）。

Does Authoritarian Leadership Necessarily Inhibit Employee Voice Behavior?——A Discussion on the Mediating Effect of Career Calling

ZHU Yunjuan, DING Guodong

School of Business, Anhui University, Hefei Anhui, 230601, China

Received:2019-12-08 Online:2020-03-01 Published:2020-03-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 当今社会竞争激烈，组织要永葆灵活性与创造力，员工建言行为是组织正确决策和提升创新绩效的关键驱动力。基于社会交换理论与自我决定理论，通过实地问卷调研和星网络问卷调研，考察双元威权领导对员工建言行为的影响以及职业使命感的中介作用。结果显示：专权领导与员工建言行为不存在直接影响关系，尚严领导与员工建言行为显著正相关；职业使命感在专权领导与员工建言行为之间起到完全中介作用，在尚严领导与员工建言行为之间起到部分中介作用。将威权领导合理分解为专权领导与尚严领导进行研究，有利于理论界和实务界正确认识威权领导的完整内涵，以及尚严领导作为威权领导的重要组成部分所发挥的积极作用，从而为企业管理者有效激发员工建言行为提供重要的思路。

关键词: 威权领导, 专权领导, 尚严领导, 职业使命感, 员工建言行为

Abstract: Based on social exchange theory and self-determination theory,the influence of ambidextrous authoritarian leadership(juan-chiuan-shang-yan leadership)on employees' voice behavior was examined,and the mediating role of career calling was tested. A total of 259 valid samples were collected, and the empirical research was carried out using the statistical analysis software SPSS and PROCESS plug-in using hierarchical regression and Bootstraping method. The empirical results show that there is no direct influence between juan-chiuan leadership and employees' voice behavior;shang-yan leadership is significantly positively correlated with employees' voice behavior;career calling plays a full mediating role between juan-chiuan leadership and employees' voice behavior, and a partial mediating role between shang-yan leadership and employees' voice behavior. The detailed analysis of authoritarian leadership into juan-chiuan leadership and shang-yan leadership will help the theoretical and practical circles to correctly understand the complete connotation of authoritarian leadership and the active role shang-yan leadership plays. The findings provide enterprise managers with suggestions for effective encouragement to employee voice behavior.

Key words: authoritarian leadership, juan-chiuan leadership, shang-yan leadership, career calling, employee voice behavior

中图分类号:

F273.1

朱云鹃, 丁国栋. 威权领导一定会抑制员工建言行为吗？——兼论职业使命感的中介作用[J]. 西南石油大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 22(2): 27-35.

ZHU Yunjuan, DING Guodong. Does Authoritarian Leadership Necessarily Inhibit Employee Voice Behavior?——A Discussion on the Mediating Effect of Career Calling[J]. 西南石油大学学报(社会科学版), 2020, 22(2): 27-35.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnsk/CN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5094.2019.12.08.01

http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnsk/CN/Y2020/V22/I2/27

参考文献

[1] Morrison E, Milliken F. Organizational Silence:A Barrier to Change and Development in a Pluralistic World[J]. Academy of Management Review,2000,25(4):706-725.
[2] 景保峰. 威权领导对员工建言行为的影响:一个有中介的调节作用分析[J].领导科学, 2015(11):50-53.
[3] 沈翔鹰,穆桂斌. 家长式领导与员工建言行为:组织认同的中介作用[J].心理与行为研究, 2018, 16(6):841-846.
[4] 周婉茹,周丽芳,郑伯埙. 专权与尚严之辨:再探威权领导的内涵与恩威并济的效果[J].本土心理学研究, 2010, 34(2):223-284.
[5] 王磊,邢志杰. 权力感知视角下的双元威权领导与员工创新行为[J].管理学报, 2019, 16(7):987-996.
[6] Chou L F, Cheng B S. Opening the Black Box:A TwoDimensional Model of Authoritarian Leadership and Task Performance[J]. Chinese Journal of Psychology, 2014, 56(4):397-414.
[7] Dobrow S R, Tosti-Kharas J. Calling:the Development of a Scale Measure[J]. Personnel Psychology, 2011, 64(4):1001-1049.
[8] 段锦云. 家长式领导对员工建言行为的影响:心理安全感的中介机制[J].管理评论, 2012, 24(10):109-116.
[9] 田在兰,黄培伦. 基于自我认知理论的家长式领导对建言的影响[J].科研管理, 2014, 35(10):150-160.
[10] 周建涛,廖建桥. 为何中国员工偏好沉默——威权领导对员工建言的消极影响[J].商业经济与管理, 2012(11):71-81.
[11] Gagné M, Deci E L. Self-Determination Theory and Work Motivation[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior,2005, 26(4):331-362.
[12] Deci E L, Ryan R M. The General Causality Orientations Scale:Self-Determination in Personality[J]. Journal of Research in Personality, 1985, 19(2):109-134.
[13] 吴宗佑. 主管威权领导与部属的工作满意度与组织承诺:信任的中介历程与情绪智力的调节效果[J].本土心理学, 2008(30):3-36.
[14] Lepine J A, Van Dyne L. Predicting Voice Behavior in Work Groups[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1998, 83(6):853-868.
[15] Morrison E W, Wheeler-Smith S L, Kamdar D. Speaking up in Groups:A Cross-Level Study of Group Voice Climate and Voice[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology,2011, 96(1):183-191.
[16] Deci E, Connell J P, Ryan R. Self-Determination in a Work Organization[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 1989, 74(4):580-590.
[17] Gouldner A W. The Norm of Reciprocity:A Preliminary Statement[J]. American Sociological Review, 1960, 25(2):161-178.
[18] Chen X P, Eberly M B, Chiang T J, et al. Affective Trust in Chinese Leaders:Linking Paternalistic Leadership to Employee Performance[J]. Journal of Management, 2014, 40(3):796-819.
[19] 樊景立,郑伯壎. 华人组织的家长式领导:一项文化观点的分析[J].本土心理学研究, 2000(13):126-180.
[20] 林姿葶,郑伯壎. 性别以领导角色孰先孰后?主管-部属性别配对、共事时间及家长式领导[J].中华心理学刊, 2007, 49(4):433-450.
[21] Chatman J A. Improving Interactional Organizational Research:A Model of Person-Organization Fit[J]. Academy of Management Review, 1989, 14(3):333-349.
[22] A O C, J C, F C D. People and Organizational Culture:A Profile Comparison Approach to Assessing PersonOrganization Fit[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1991, 34(3):487-516.
[23] Detert J, Burris E. Leadership Behavior and Employee Voice:Is The Door Really Open?[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2007, 50(4):869-884.
[24] Bunderson J S, Thompson J A. The Call of the Wild:Zookeepers, Callings, and the Double-edged Sword of Deeply Meaningful Work[J]. Administrative Science Quarterly, 2009, 54(1):32-57.
[25] Kalberg S, Kalberg S. The Protestant Ethic and the Spirit of Capitalism[M]. New York:Routledge, 2001:125-133.
[26] Hall D T, Chandler D E. Psychological Success:When the Career is a Calling[J]. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 2005, 26(2):155-176.
[27] Dik B, Eldridge B, Steger M. Development and Validation of the Calling and Vocation Questionnaire (CVQ) and Brief Calling Scale(BCS)[J]. Journal of Career Assessment, 2012, 20(3):242-263.
[28] 段锦云,黄彩云. 变革型领导对员工建言的影响机制再探:自我决定的视角[J].南开管理评论, 2014, 17(4):98-109.
[29] 王圣慧,易明,罗瑾琏. 双元领导对建言行为的影响:内部动机与外部动机的作用[J].科学学与科学技术管理, 2019, 40(7):136-150.
[30] Spreitzer G M. Social Structural Characteristics Of Psychological Empowerment[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39(2):483-504.
[31] Cavanaugh M A, Boswell W R, Roehling M V, et al. An Empirical Examination of Self-Reported Work Stress among U.S. Managers[J]. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2000, 85(1):65-74.
[32] 呙林义,康宛竹,张吉昌. 挑战性压力源对员工主动行为的影响——职业使命感与授权型领导的作用[J].科技与经济, 2019, 32(1):66-70.
[33] Domene J F. Calling and Career Outcome Expectations:The Mediating Role of Self-efficacy[J]. Journal of Career Assessment, 2012, 20(3):281-292.
[34] Duffy R D, Dik B J. Research on Calling:What have we Learned and Where are we going?[J]. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 2013, 83(3):428-436.
[35] Liang J, Farh C, Farh J. Psychological Antecedents of Promotive and Prohibitive Voice:A Two-Wave Examination[J]. Academy of Management Journal, 2012, 55(1):71-92.
[36] Edwards J R, Lambert L S. Methods for Integrating Moderation and Mediation:A General Analytical Framework Using Moderated Path Analysis[J]. Psychological Methods, 2007, 12(1):1-22.

威权领导一定会抑制员工建言行为吗？——兼论职业使命感的中介作用

Does Authoritarian Leadership Necessarily Inhibit Employee Voice Behavior?——A Discussion on the Mediating Effect of Career Calling

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 2

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	柏明国, 李中娟. 传统制造企业绿色创新的驱动机理研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 20(3): 13-20.
[2]	罗兰芳, 何同宏, 叶宁. 福建省制造业创新驱动研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(社会科学版), 2018, 20(1): 43-51.