西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 23 ›› Issue (5): 67-76.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5094.2021.04.23.02

• 政治与法律 • 上一篇    下一篇

《监察法》实施后职务犯罪异地管辖实证研究——以省部级高官为例

刘文涛1, 刘渺2   

  1. 1. 四川大学法学院, 四川 成都 610207;
    2. 四川省内江市人民检察院, 四川 内江 641199
  • 收稿日期:2021-04-23 出版日期:2021-09-01 发布日期:2021-09-27
  • 作者简介:刘文涛(1993-),男(汉族),甘肃天水人,博士研究生,研究方向:刑事诉讼法、证据法学。
  • 基金资助:
    中央高校基本科研业务费专项资金课题“司法和监察体制改革背景下刑事诉讼法修改问题研究”(YJ201760)。

Jurisdiction over Duty Crimes after the Implementation of the Law on Administration Supervision——An Empirical Study on Senior Officials Crimes at Provincial and Ministerial Levels

LIU Wentao1, LIU Miao2   

  1. 1. Law School, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610207, China;
    2. The People's Procuratorate of Neijiang City, Neijiang Sichuan, 641199, China
  • Received:2021-04-23 Online:2021-09-01 Published:2021-09-27

摘要: 目前,我国职务犯罪已经形成了异地管辖的司法惯例。职务犯罪异地管辖不仅有利于保障司法独立、断绝不当干预、树立司法权威,而且有利于整合司法资源、迅速查明案情。党的十八大以来,随着监察体制改革的深入推进,一大批高官密集落马,职务犯罪异地管辖呈现常态化的趋势。当前,我国职务犯罪异地管辖具有适用率高、贯穿办案全过程、指定管辖标准复杂等特点,同时存在着法律依据不足、标准不明、程序衔接较混乱、司法成本高昂等问题。正式确立职务犯罪异地管辖制度、细化职务犯罪异地管辖标准、厘清职务犯罪关联管辖和重合管辖、建立职务犯罪异地管辖申请权等措施,是今后进一步完善职务犯罪异地管辖需要考虑的重要内容。

关键词: 监察法, 职务犯罪, 异地管辖, 高官犯罪, 指定管辖

Abstract: It has been a common judicial practice in China to deal with duty crimes across administrative borders. Off-site jurisdiction over duty crimes is conducive to ensuring judicial independence, cutting off intervention and establishing judicial authority, and to integrating judicial resources and investigation of the case. Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China and the reform of the supervision system, a large number of senior officials have been investigated and charged of crimes. Through empirical research we have found that off-site jurisdiction over duty crimes is widely applicable and runs through the whole process of investigation, prosecution and court trial, and that the standard for designation of jurisdiction is complex. However, there are still problems in off-site jurisdiction over duty crimes, such as insufficient legal basis and standards, unclear procedures and high judicial costs. To perfect the standards and procedures of off-site jurisdiction, it is necessary to establish a formal system of off-site jurisdiction over duty crimes through legislation, to determine detailed standards for designation of jurisdiction, to clarify relevant and overlapping jurisdiction over duty crimes, and to grant the defendant the right to apply for jurisdiction to strengthen the protection of the defendant's rights.

Key words: law on administration supervision, duty crime, off-site jurisdiction, senior official crime, designated jurisdiction

中图分类号: