论推定

doi:10.3863/j.issn.1674-5094.2010.06.009

西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2010, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (6): 45-49.DOI: 10.3863/j.issn.1674-5094.2010.06.009

论推定

靳凌飞

中国政法大学研究生院，北京 100088

收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2010-11-20

RESEARCH ON PRESUMPTION

JIN Ling-fei

Graduate School，China University of Political Science and Law，Beijing，100088，China

Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2010-11-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 归纳推理天然的缺陷性和现实公允性决定了推定事实的或然性或主观性，因此我们要设置一系列的规则来最大程度地保证推定结论的真实性。它作为证据裁判主义的例外，在无法用证据证明案件事实或争议事实时发挥着无可替代的巨大作用；但同时，经验法则或逻辑规则的不全面性或主观性导致了推定与生俱来的缺陷性——盖然性真实。所以推定仅能作为查明案件事实的辅助型方法，也正因为此，我们需要对推定作出一系列的规制以期最大程度降低其负面效应。

关键词: 推定, 法律推定, 事实推定, 证明责任

Abstract: The natural limitations of inductive reasoning means that presumption is of probability and subjectivity.Therefore，rules and regulations are set to guarantee the authenticity of presumptions.As an alternative to the evidentiary adjudication，it plays an irreplaceable and important role in proving any cases that cannot be proved conclusively or disputably based on evidence.However，the insufficiency or subjectivity of the rule of thumb or logic results in the inherent limitation of presumption-probability of truth.Therefore，presumption can only be used as a supplementary means of case investigation.For the same reason，it is necessary to sketch a series of regulations to reduce its negative effects to the maximum degree.

Key words: presumption, presumption of law, presumption of fact, burden of proof

中图分类号: