“遗嘱内容相抵触”诸问题探讨

doi:10.3863/j.issn.1674-5094.2011.04.011

西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2011, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (4): 53-57.DOI: 10.3863/j.issn.1674-5094.2011.04.011

“遗嘱内容相抵触”诸问题探讨

梁分

西南石油大学文法学院，四川成都 610500

收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2011-07-20

A DISCUSSION ON “CONFLICT WITH ONE ANOTHER IN CONTENT” AND OTHER PROBLEMS

LIANG Fen

School of Arts and Law，Southwest Petroleum University，Chengdu Sichuan 610500，China

Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2011-07-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 我国《继承法》第20条是关于遗嘱撤销、变更制度的规定，学界对其研究者不多。该条文中的遗嘱内容相抵触、部分抵触、公证遗嘱的优先效力等规定在实际运用中均存在问题。案例研究表明：立法应明确“遗嘱内容相抵触”的准确含义；对遗嘱内容部分抵触的，应借鉴合同法关于合同部分无效的规定予以明确；可按自书遗嘱对待的遗书应视为遗嘱；公证遗嘱与其他种类的遗嘱不应有效力大小之别。

关键词: 遗嘱, 遗嘱撤销, 遗嘱变更, 遗嘱内容相抵触, 公证遗嘱, 遗书

Abstract: There are not many researches done on the regulation of revocation and alteration of wills by Article 20 of Law of Succession of the People′s Republic of China.The author thinks that in law practice，problems exist in regulations of “conflict with one another in content”，“partially conflict with one another” and of the prevalence of notarial wills.Case study reveals that the exact meaning of “conflict with one another in content” should be clearly defined，wills which “partially conflict with one another” should be defined by making reference to terms of partially invalid contracts by Labor Contract Law，and one′s last written words which can be regarded as testatorwritten wills should enjoy equal validity to other forms of wills，which，the author thinks，should also enjoy equal validity to notarial wills.

Key words: will, revocation of will, alteration of will, conflict with one another in content, notarial will, last written words

中图分类号: