西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2012, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (6): 47-52.DOI: 10.3863/j.issn.1674-5094.2012.06.010

• 政治学与法学 • 上一篇    下一篇

妨害公务案件疑难问题实证研究

宋鹏   

  1. 北京市顺义区人民检察院,北京 顺义区101300
  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2012-11-01 发布日期:2012-11-01

Empirical Study on the Problems of interference with public servant cases

SONG Peng   

  1. People’s Procuratorate of Shunyi District of Beijing,Shunyi Beijing 101300,China
  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2012-11-01 Published:2012-11-01

摘要: 近年来,妨害公务案件呈高发态势,妨害手段的暴力、威胁程度也呈现升级态势。实践中,在办理该类案件时承办人往往在定罪、量刑等方面存在诸多问题,亟待解决。通过对样本所在地区2007年至2011年发生的150件妨害公务案件进行的研究,反映出目前我国法律对妨害公务行为所侵犯对象的范围、妨害公务中“暴力、威胁”的程度、执行公务行为存在瑕疵对案件的影响及妨害公务案件是否可以适用刑事和解等问题需要进一步明确与完善。

关键词: 妨害公务, 妨害执法, 妨害公务罪, 司法和解, 公务人员

Abstract: In recent years,cases of crimes of interference with state function have been on the rise. The degree of interference violation and threatening also become more and more serious. In practice,there are many problems in conviction and sentencing,which are in urgent need to be solved. By studying the 150 cases of interference with public function happening from the year 2007 to 2011 in the district where the samples are taken,the author find out that the current law concerning crimes of interference with state function needs to be more explicit and further perfected in the following aspects: the range of the objects of the interference,the degree of violence and threatening of interference,the influence of the flaw in performing public duties on the cases and whether the judicial reconciliation can apply to crimes of interference with state function.

Key words: interference with state function, interference with law enforcement, crime of interference with state function, judicial reconciliation, public servant

中图分类号: