西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (1): 68-74.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674 5094.2015.10.21.03

• 法学 • 上一篇    下一篇

论罪犯“确有悔改表现”的认定

耿 亮 张永强   

  1. 西南政法大学法学院,重庆 401120
  • 出版日期:2016-01-01 发布日期:2016-01-01
  • 通讯作者: 张永强(1988 ),男(汉族),甘肃天水人,博士研究生,研究方向:中国刑法学、犯罪心理学。
  • 作者简介:耿 亮(1990 ),男(汉族),江苏徐州人,硕士研究生,研究方向:中国刑法学、犯罪学。

Determination of Criminals’“True Repentance Performance”

GENG Liang ZHANG Yongqiang   

  1. School of Law,Southwest University Of Political Science and Law,Chongqing,401120,China
  • Online:2016-01-01 Published:2016-01-01

摘要:

“确有悔改表现”是指罪犯主观上有悔过的情感、客观上有改过自新的表现,是主客观相统一的概念。依据我国《刑法》第 78 条、第 81 条的规定,确有悔改表现的主要依据是罪犯主观恶性和人身危险性的降低,体现出行为人对社会的价值观、法律规范的认可,其对审判阶段的量刑以及刑罚执行阶段的减刑、假释均有重要影响。在具体实践中,认定罪犯的确有悔改表现存在认定方法不合理、认定程序保障机制缺失、认定后监督机制缺失等问题。为了维护司法判决的威严、准确有效地认定罪犯的确有悔改表现,应当建立健全心理评估与调查问卷相结合的考核制度,构建科学的认定程序,设置有效的认定监督机制。

关键词: 确有悔改表现, 人身危险性, 主观恶性, 减刑, 假释

Abstract:

Criminals’“true repentance performance”means that the criminal has penitent intention and makes real efforts to reform himself. It is the unity of subjective and objective concept.“True repentance performance”,a necessary condition for commutation and parole,is mainly based on the criminal subjective viciousness and personal hazard reduction. But problems exist in practice when determining“true repentance performance”in method of determination,procedure insurance measures, and supervision mechanism. To maintain the solemnity of judicial judgment and to accurately determine“true repentance performance”,it is necessary to establish a comprehensive appraisal system which includes both psychological assessment and questionnaire survey,and an effective supervision mechanism.

Key words: true repentance performance, personal hazard, subjective viciousness, commutation, parole

中图分类号: