西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (3): 29-36.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5094.2019.03.05.03

• 经济与管理 • 上一篇    下一篇

一个简明述评:福利多元主义与社会保障社会化

徐进   

  1. 甘肃政法学院公共管理学院, 甘肃 兰州 730070
  • 收稿日期:2019-03-05 出版日期:2019-05-01 发布日期:2019-05-01
  • 作者简介:徐进(1982-),男(汉族),山东淄川人,讲师,硕士,研究方向:社会保障理论与政策。
  • 基金资助:
    2017年度甘肃省哲学社会科学规划项目“福利多元主义视域下‘七五’计划以来我国社会保障政策的演进及其启示”(YB108);2013年度国家社科基金项目“西北民族地区公民参与社会管理研究”(13BZZ026)。

A Concise Commentary: Welfare Pluralism and Socialization of Social Security

Xu Jin   

  1. School of Public Administration, Gansu Institute of Political Science and Law, Lanzhou Gansu, 730070, China
  • Received:2019-03-05 Online:2019-05-01 Published:2019-05-01

摘要: 西方的社会福利多元主义理论和中国的社会保障社会化理论作为当今世界两大福利供给理论范式,各自历经了多年的理论变迁,已逐渐被世界社会保障理论界和实务界所接受。福利多元主义理论起源于简单二元论,经历了福利三分法、福利四分法和福利五边形等发展阶段;“社会保障社会化”一词首见于我国的“七五”计划,随后其理论体系逐步被发展和完善。福利多元主义和社会保障社会化理论均主张福利供给主体的多元化,但是,福利多元主义因过分专注福利供给主体的多元化而今已失之狭隘;而社会保障社会化以社会共同责任本位为理念基础,以最大限度地满足社会成员的三层社会保障需求为出发点和落脚点,以实现社会保障制度的社会性和全民化为终极奋斗目标,堪为真正意义上的福利治理理论。

关键词: 福利供给理论, 福利多元主义, 社会保障社会化, 网络治理, 福利治理

Abstract: Western social welfare pluralism theory and Chinese social security socialization theory, the two major theoretical paradigms of welfare supply in the world today, have gone through years of evolution and have gradually been accepted by the theoretical and practical circles of social security in the world. Welfare pluralism and social security socialization both advocate pluralistic arrangements for the provision of social welfare and has altered the roles of the state, market, and civil society in welfare provision. While welfare pluralism pays too much attention to the diversification of the provider of welfare supply, socialization of social security is based on the concept of common social responsibility to realize a social security system that covers all citizens, and therefore can be regarded as a more reasonable theory of welfare governance.

Key words: welfare provision theory, welfare pluralism, socialization of social security, network governance, welfare governance

中图分类号: