自由或规制：我国民事诉讼认证模式利益考量

doi:10.3863/j.issn.1674-5094.2011.01.011

西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2011, Vol. 13 ›› Issue (1): 51-56.DOI: 10.3863/j.issn.1674-5094.2011.01.011

自由或规制：我国民事诉讼认证模式利益考量

张牧遥

淮阴师范学院法学院，江苏淮安 223300

收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2011-01-20

CONSIDERATION OF THE INTERESTS IN THE JUDGE′S DETERMINATION OF CIVIL EVIDENCE IN CHINA

ZHANG Mu-yao

The Law School of Huaiyin Normal University，Jiangsu Huai′an 223300，China

Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2011-01-20

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在人类社会的历史发展长河之中,先后产生过三种基本的证据模式,从而形成三种证据制度。在不同的证据模式下，法官的认证过程有着规制和自由两种对立特质。但是，不论选择何种模式，法官认证均是以法律为量器的利益衡量过程。对此观点，通过证明模式的纵向历史沿革考察、横向特征差异考察、宏观的利益考量和微观的利益考量等研究方式将能得到圆满论证。这一观点的论证价值也体现于我国民事认证模式的定位与选择之中。


关键词: 民事诉讼证据, 认证模式, 利益衡量, 自由心证, 法定证据

Abstract: In the long course of historical development of human society，three basic patterns of evidence have been produced and thus three evidence systems have been formed.In the process of the Judge′s determination，there exist two opposite natures：regulation and freedom.However，regardless of the nature，the judge′s determination must be based on the interests measured by law.Both a study of history of law and a horizontal comparison，and consideration of both macro interests and micro ones satisfactorily demonstrate such an opinion.This idea is also demonstrated by orientation and choice of civil evidence.

Key words: evidence of civil litigation, evidence determination mode, the measure of interests, judicial discretion, legal evidence

中图分类号: