西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2013, Vol. 15 ›› Issue (1): 57-63.DOI: 10.3863/j.issn.1674-5094.2013.01.010

• 政治学与法学 • 上一篇    下一篇

共同侵权行为的新界定

杨会

  

  1. 天津师范大学法学院,天津 300387
  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2013-01-01 发布日期:2013-01-01

A New Definition of Joint Tort

YANG Hui   

  1. Law School,Tianjin Normal University,Tianjin 300387,China
  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2013-01-01 Published:2013-01-01

摘要: 共同侵权行为应当采新“兼指说”,包括意思联络型共同侵权行为和同一行为型共同侵权行为。意思联络是指数个侵权行为人之间就其数个侵权行为可能造成的损害后果所进行的联络;意思联络时侵权行为人的过错为故意或过于自信的过失,而不可能是疏忽大意的过失。同一侵权行为是指数个侵权行为人同时实施的同一个侵权行为;同一侵权行为中所谓的数个侵权行为时间和空间上完全相同、侵害对象和侵害后果一模一样,其实就是一个侵权行为。新“兼指说”包括了同一侵权行为,又采纳了“意思联络说”,比较合理。

关键词: 侵权法, 共同侵权行为, 意思联络, 同一侵权行为, 新“兼指说”

Abstract: A new theory of “subjective & objective liability” should be adapted in the definition of joint tort which takes both intentional joint tort and unintentional joint tort into consideration. Intentional joint tort means several tort feasors contact with each other on the possible damage caused by their infringement. The fault of these tort feasors is intentional or overconfident negligence,but not careless negligence. Unintentional joint tort means several tort feasors carry out one and the same tort together. The so called torts occur in the same place and at the same time,and the victim and damage are identical. Therefore this new theory is reasonable.

Key words: tort law, joint tort, intentional fault, unintentional fault, new “subjective &, objective” theory

中图分类号: