西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 22 ›› Issue (4): 71-77.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5094.2020.03.27.03

• 政治与法律 • 上一篇    下一篇

人民陪审员制度的现实困境与完善路径

党振兴   

  1. 甘肃省岷县人民法院, 甘肃 岷县 748400
  • 收稿日期:2020-03-27 出版日期:2020-07-01 发布日期:2020-07-01
  • 作者简介:党振兴(1985-),男(汉族),甘肃岷县人,一级法官,研究方向:民事法学、司法理论。

The Realistic Dilemma and Perfect Path of the People's Assessors

DANG Zhenxing   

  1. People's Court of Minxian County of Gansu Province, Minxian Gansu, 748400, China
  • Received:2020-03-27 Online:2020-07-01 Published:2020-07-01

摘要: 人民陪审员制度对贯彻落实人民民主、实现司法公开公正、提升司法公信力、加强司法监督和法治宣传、解决法院案多人少问题等有着十分重要的意义。目前,受制于法律法规对人民陪审员选任条件的要求过高,对人民陪审员的职权行使、业绩考评和责任追究等方面规定不明确,人民陪审员制度在司法实践中还存在着一定的瑕疵。为了更好地发挥人民陪审员在案件审理中的作用,需要从选任机制的建设、管理制度的完善、实质性参审职能的发挥、奖惩手段的运用、培训和退出机制的健全等方面入手,逐步推进矛盾纠纷的多元化解,提升司法服务水平和加快司法文明的建设步伐。

关键词: 人民陪审员, 人民陪审员委员会, 实质化参审, 司法公开, 司法监督

Abstract: The system of people's assessors is of great significance in ensuring judicial justice and openness and people's democracy, promoting judicial credibility, strengthening judicial supervision and publicity of the rule of law, and in promoting settlement of court cases. However, at present, people's assessor system is subject to laws and regulations that stipulate excessively high conditions for the selection and appointment of people's assessors, and unclear provisions on the exercise of people's assessors' functions and powers, performance appraisal and accountability. In order for people's assessors to better play their role of in case trials, measures should be taken in the construction and improvement of the selection mechanism and management system, substantive participation in case trials, the use of rewards and punishments, and improvement of training and exit mechanism so that disputes are resolved in varied ways and the quality of judicial service is improved and the judicial civilization construction is accelerated.

Key words: people's assessors, committee of people's assessors, substantive participation, judicial openness, judicial supervision

中图分类号: