西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (3): 72-81.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5094.2016.02.18.01
Previous Articles Next Articles
Mo Xiaoyu Li Hao
Online:
Published:
Abstract:
In China’s criminal law,continual offence is defined as the offence committed by the perpetrator in a certain period of time after he has been meted out twice or more administrative penalties by administrative authorities for committing the offence several times. At present,continual crime is applied to more than a dozen of crimes in China’s criminal law. However,criminal law scholars have yet reached consensus about this phenomenon,and there is few studies on continual crimes. The concept of continual crime is the result of social and economic development and criminal justice practice. There was no clear definition about continual crimes in the first Criminal Code of new China Criminal Law of the People’s Republic of China enacted in 1979. But after that,regulations about this type of crime were seen in a number of specific criminal laws and judicial interpretations;the 1997 version of criminal law absorbed related content of the above mentioned specific criminal laws and judicial interpretations,and the later criminal law amendments and judicial interpretations finally led to a more mature definition about continual crimes. Continual crime constitute a new type of crime mode which differs from consequential crime and potential damage offense due to its social harmfulness of serious violation of law interests and the need for crime prevention in the period of national transformation and due to the greater difficulty in fighting against such kind of crimes.
Key words: continual crime, behavioral offence, consequential offence, administrative penalty, criminal penalty
CLC Number:
DF611
Mo Xiaoyu Li Hao. An Analysis of the Criminal Regulation and Theory Development and Generation Mechanism of Continual Offences[J]. 西南石油大学学报(社会科学版), 2016, 18(3): 72-81.
0 / / Recommend
Add to citation manager EndNote|Ris|BibTeX
URL: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnsk/EN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5094.2016.02.18.01
http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnsk/EN/Y2016/V18/I3/72
[1] 张明楷. 刑法学:第 3 版[M]. 北京:法律出版社,2007: 154. [2] 刘德法,孔德琴. 论多次犯[J]. 法治研究,2011(9):83. [3] 刘艳红. 刑法学:下[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,2014: 371. [4] 黎宏. 刑法学[M]. 北京:法律出版社,2012:858. [5] 顾肖荣. 体系刑法学:刑法分则四[M]. 北京:中国法制出版社,2012:219. [6] 马克昌. 犯罪通论:下卷[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社, 2014:1064. [7] 赵秉志. 犯罪总论问题探索[M]. 北京:法律出版社, 2003:283. [8] 张明楷. 司法上的犯罪化与非犯罪化[J]. 法学家, 2008(4):66-67. [9] 胡剑锋“行政处罚后又实施”入罪的反思及限缩 . [J]. 政治与法律,2014(8):42-48. [10] 曹坚. 多次犯形态的认定[J]. 人民检察,2013(14):17. [11] 肖洪,汤思淼. 对多次犯的反思[J]. 江苏警官学院学报,2015(1):29-35. [12] 张志勋,卢建平. 多次犯:刑法的制度化产物及其限制路径[J]. 江西社会科学,2015(6):140. [13] 马克昌,赵秉志. 刑法学:第 5 版[M]. 北京:北京大学出版社,高等教育出版社,2011. [14] [德]乌尔里希 · 贝克. 风险社会[M]. 何博闻,译. 北京:译林出版社,2004. [15] 邓正来,沈国麟. 风险社会与中国 与德国社会学家乌尔里希 · 贝克的对话[J]. 社会学研究,2010(5): 215-216. [16] 张明楷“风险社会”若干刑法理论问题反思 . [J]. 法商研究,2011(5):83-84. [17] 关振海. 从“厉而不严”到“严而不厉”:中国刑法结构的发展趋向[J]. 理论与现代化,2009(4):108-111. [18] 赵亮. 当代中国社会转型时期的刑事政策调整[M]. 北京:法律出版社,2013:144. [19] 杨永华. 行政执法与刑事司法衔接的理论与实践[M]. 北京:中国检察出版社,2013:10. [20] [意]切萨雷 · 贝卡利亚. 论犯罪与刑罚[M]. 黄风,译. 北京:中国方正出版社,2004:28. [21] 杜宇. 传统刑事责任理论的反思与重构 以刑事和解为切入点的展开[M]. 北京:中国政法大学出版社, 2012:184.