西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 19 ›› Issue (6): 64-69.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5094.2017.06.25.01

Previous Articles     Next Articles

An Analysis of the Subjective Fault in Possession Crime

CHEN Ziqiang, GAO Yang   

  1. School of Law, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610500, China
  • Received:2017-06-25 Online:2017-11-01 Published:2017-11-01
  • Contact: 高扬(1993-),女(汉族),山西太原人,硕士研究生,研究方向:刑法学。

Abstract: The original intention for China to add possession crime to the Criminal Law is to tighten the criminal law. However, there is a widespread controversy in the academic circle about the objective character and subjective fault in possession crime. Furthermore, no agreement has been reached as for whether the subjective fault in possession crime is intentional or negligent. In fact, the doer of possession crime often do not deny the harmful result; therefore, possession crime should be an intentional crime, which, however, is not adequate to support the particularity of subjective fault in possession crime. The doer of possession can merely realize the occurrence possibility of the criminal result caused by the behaviors of possession, and take a negative and indulgent attitude towards possible harm-causing possession. Hence, the subjective fault in possession crime can only be an indirect intention. And because the possession causes a harmful result of hazardous condition, possession crime can be identified as an indirect intention crime.

Key words: possession crime, subjective fault, direct intention, indirect intention, strict liability

CLC Number: