辫状河储层内部建筑结构及剩余油分布研究

doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2017.03.05.05

西南石油大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (4): 51-60.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2017.03.05.05

辫状河储层内部建筑结构及剩余油分布研究

李伟强^1,2, 尹太举², 赵伦¹, 李峰³, 陈梁²

1. 中国石油勘探开发研究院, 北京海淀 100083;
2. 长江大学地球科学学院, 湖北武汉 430100;
3. 中国石油国际勘探开发有限公司, 北京西城区 100034

收稿日期:2017-03-05 出版日期:2018-08-01 发布日期:2018-08-01
通讯作者: 尹太举,E-mail:yintaij@yangtzeu.edu.cn
作者简介:李伟强,1990年生,男,汉族,河南柘城人,博士研究生,主要从事油气田开发地质方面的研究工作。E-mail:liweiq0608@163.com;尹太举,1971年生,男,汉族,河南南阳人,教授,博士后,主要从事储层沉积学和开发地质研究及教学工作。E-mail:yintaij@yangtzeu.edu.cn;赵伦,1970年生,男,汉族,重庆南川人,博士,主要从事海外油气开发研究。E-mail:zhaolun@petrochina.com.cn;李峰,1989年生,男,汉族,江苏赣榆人,硕士,主要从事油气田开发地质方面的研究。E-mail:lifeng_v8@163.com;陈梁,1992生,女,汉族,江苏扬州人,硕士研究生,主要从事油气开发地质方面的研究。E-mail:2587609307@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（41172106，41072087）；国家科技重大专项（2011ZX05010-002-005）

Study on the Reservoir Architecture and Remaining Oil Distribution of Braided Channel

LI Weiqiang^1,2, YIN Taiju², ZHAO Lun¹, LI Feng³, CHEN Liang²

1. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration & Development, Haidian, Beijing 100083, China;
2. College of Geoscience, Yangtze University, Wuhan, Hubei 430100, China;
3. China National Oil and Gas Exploration and Development Co., Ltd., Xicheng, Beijing 100034, China

Received:2017-03-05 Online:2018-08-01 Published:2018-08-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 储层内部建筑结构是影响开发效果的决定性因素，对剩余油分布具有控制作用。基于河流相建筑结构分析理论，在辫状河沉积模式指导下，采用层次分析法，从开发角度对砂体内部结构进行精细解剖，识别和确定出辫状河道、心滩坝、废弃河道和落淤层等结构要素，弄清各级次、各期次结构要素的接触关系，完成辫状河储层内部结构的精细表征；基于内部结构表征成果，结合不同时期水淹层测井解释结果和生产动态资料，恢复不同开发调整时期的水淹特征，动态表征辫状河储层内部结构控制下的水淹过程，并依据小井距密闭取芯井精细水洗结果验证，总结不同储层结构控制下的剩余油分布模式。结果表明，辫状河储层整体以高含水为主，水淹呈不均匀立体式、随机式特征，不具有分段水淹的特点，未水淹部位分布非常零散，局部物性变差部位、落淤层和低渗屏障遮挡部位直接控制了剩余油的分布。

关键词: 辫状河, 储层建筑结构, 水淹特征, 剩余油, 大庆油田

Abstract: The reservoir architecture is the key factor influencing the outcome of oil and gas production, and controls the distribution of the remaining oil. Based on the theory of architectural-element of fluvial reservoir and the depositional model of braided rivers, this study performed hierarchical analysis and dissected the reservoir architecture elements of sandbodies in detail for the purpose of future production. Structural elements including braided channels, channel bars, abandoned channels, and mud drapes, were identified and confirmed. Contact modes among architectural elements of different levels and periods were recognized to complete the detailed characterization of the reservoir architecture of braided channel. Based on these results, and in conjunction with interpretation of water-flooded layers from logging data of different time periods and dynamic production performance, water-flooding characteristics at various production and adjustment stages were reconstructed. The water-flooding process controlled by reservoir architecture of braided channel was dynamically characterized. The distribution of the remaining oil controlled by the reservoir architecture is summarized and confirmed by the detailed water-flooding results of densely spaced sealed coring wells. The results show that the braided river reservoir has a generally high water content, with three-dimensional inhomogeneous and random water-flooding characteristics that do not occur in segmentations. The non-flooded regions are very scattered. Locations with local deterioration of reservoir physical properties, mud drapes, and low-permeability barrier occlusion directly control the distribution of the remaining oil.

Key words: braided channel, reservoir architecture, water-flooding characteristics, remaining oil, Daqing Oilfield

中图分类号:

TE122

李伟强, 尹太举, 赵伦, 李峰, 陈梁. 辫状河储层内部建筑结构及剩余油分布研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 40(4): 51-60.

LI Weiqiang, YIN Taiju, ZHAO Lun, LI Feng, CHEN Liang. Study on the Reservoir Architecture and Remaining Oil Distribution of Braided Channel[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 40(4): 51-60.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2017.03.05.05

http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/Y2018/V40/I4/51

参考文献

[1] MIALL A D. Architectural-element analysis:A new method of facies analysis applied to fluvial deposits[J]. Earth-Science Reviews, 1985, 22(4):261-308. doi:10.-1016/0012-8252(85)90001-7
[2] MIALL A D. Architectural elements and bounding surfaces in fluvial deposits:Anatomy of the Kayenta Formation (lower Jurassic), southwest Colorado[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 1988, 55(3-4):233-240, 247-262. doi:10.-1016/0037-0738(88)90133-9
[3] 岳大力. 曲流河储层构型分析与剩余油分布模式研究——以孤岛油田馆陶组为例[D]. 北京:中国石油大学(北京), 2006. YUE Dali. The study on architecture analysis and remaining oil distribution patterns of meandering river reservoir:A case study of Guantao Formation, Gudao Oilfield[D]. Beijing:China University of Petroleum, 2006.
[4] 梁宏伟,穆龙新,范子菲,等. 基于正演模拟的曲流河构型层次研究[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2014, 43(6):1063-1069. doi:10.13247/j.cnki.jcumt.000175 LIANG Hongwei, MU Longxin, FAN Zifei, et al. The AHP study of architecture pattern of meandering reservoir on the basis of forward simulation[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2014, 43(6):1063-1069. doi:10.13247/j.cnki.jcumt.000175
[5] 赵伦,梁宏伟,张祥忠,等. 砂体构型特征与剩余油分布模式——以哈萨克斯坦南图尔盖盆地Kumkol South油田为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(3):433-441. doi:10.11698/PED.2016.03.00 ZHAO Lun, LIANG Hongwei, ZHANG Xiangzhong, et al. Relationship between sandstone architecture and remaining oil distribution pattern:A case of the Kumkol South Oilfield in South Turgay Basin, Kazakstan[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(3):433-441. doi:10.11698/PED.2016.03.00
[6] BRIDGE J, COLLIER R, ALEXANDER J. Large-scale structure of Calamus river deposits (Nebraska, USA) revealed using ground-penetrating radar[J]. Sedimentology, 1998, 45(6):977-986. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3091.1998.-00174.x
[7] YU X. Sedimentology and reservoir characteristics of a middle Jurassic fluvial system, Datong Basin, northern China[J]. Bulletin of Canadian Petroleum Geology, 2002, 50(1):105-117. doi:10.2113/50.1.105
[8] LABOURDETTE R, JONES R R. Characterization of fluvial architectural elements using a three-dimensional outcrop data set:Escanilla braided system, South-Central Pyrenees, Spain[J]. Geosphere, 2007, 3(6):422-434. doi:10.1130/GES00087.1
[9] 印森林,吴胜和,陈恭洋,等. 基于砂砾质辫状河沉积露头隔夹层研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 36(4):29-36. doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2013.05.27.03 YIN Senlin, WU Shenghe, CHEN Gongyang, et al. A study on intercalation of sand-gravel braided river deposit based on outcrop section[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2014, 36(4):29-36. doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2013.05.-27.03
[10] 廖保方,张为民,李列,等. 辫状河现代沉积研究与相模式——中国永定河剖析[J]. 沉积学报, 1998, 16(1):34-39. doi:10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.1998.01.006 LIAO Baofang, ZHANG Weimin, LI Lie, et al. Study on modern deposit of a braided stream and facies model:Taking the Yongding river as an example[J]. Acta Sedimentological Sinica, 1998, 16(1):34-39. doi:10.14027/j.cnki.-cjxb.1998.01.006
[11] BEST J L, ASHWORTH P J, BRISTOW C S, et al. Three-dimensional sedimentary architecture of a large, mid-channel sand braid bar, Jamuna river, Bangladesh[J]. Journal of Sedimentary Research, 2003, 73(4):516-530. doi:10.1306/010603730516
[12] 徐中波,申春生,陈玉琨,等. 砂质辫状河储层构型表征及其对剩余油的控制——以渤海海域P油田为例[J]. 沉积学报,2016,34(2):375-385. doi:10.14027/-j.cnki.cjxb.2016.02.016 XU Zhongbo, SHEN Chunsheng, CHEN Yukun, et al. Architecture characterization for sandy braided river reservoir and controlling factors of remaining oil distribution:A case study of P Oilfield (Neogene), Bohai Offshore, China[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2016, 34(2):375-385. doi:10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.2016.02.016
[13] 白振强. 辫状河砂体三维构型地质建模研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 32(6):21-24. doi:10.3863/j.issn.1674-5086.2010.06.005 BAI Zhenqiang. Study on the 3D architecture geological modeling of braided fluvial sandbody[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2010, 32(6):21-24. doi:10.3863/j.issn.1674-5086.-2010.06.005
[14] 孙天建,穆龙新,吴向红,等. 砂质辫状河储层构型表征方法——以苏丹穆格莱特盆地Hegli油田为例[J]. 石油学报, 2014, 35(4):715-724. doi:10.7623/-syxb201404012 SUN Tianjian, MU Longxin, WU Xianghong, et al. A quantitative method for architectural characterization of sandy braided-river reservoirs:Taking Hegli Oilfield of Muglad Basin in Sudan as an example[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2014, 35(4):715-724. doi:10.7623/-syxb201404012
[15] 牛博,高兴军,赵应成,等. 古辫状河心滩坝内部构型表征与建模——以大庆油田萨中密井网区为例[J]. 石油学报, 2015, 36(1):89-100. doi:10.7623/-syxb201501011 NIU Bo, GAO Xingjun, ZHAO Yingcheng, et al. Architecture characterization and modeling of channel bar in paleo-braided river:A case study of dense well pattern area of Sazhong in Daqing Oilfield[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2015, 36(1):89-100. doi:10.7623/syxb201501011
[16] YIN S, HU Z, REN X, et al. Reservoir architecture patterns of sandy gravel braided distributary channel:A case study of Triassic Upper Karamay Formation, Xinjiang Oilfield[J]. Petroleum, 2016, 2(2):117-129. doi:10.1016/j.-petlm.2016.02.003
[17] 王敏,穆龙新,赵国良,等. 分汊与游荡型辫状河储层构型研究:以苏丹FN油田为例[J]. 地学前缘, 2017, 24(2):246-256. doi:10.13745/j.esf.yx.2016-12-26 WANG Min, MU Longxin, ZHAO Guoliang, et al. Architecture analysis of reservoirs in branching-and wanderingbased braided rivers:Taking FN Field, Sudan as an example[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2017, 24(2):246-256. doi:10.13745/j.esf.yx.2016-12-26
[18] 张昌民. 储层研究中的层次分析法[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 1992, 13(3):344-350. doi:10.11743/ogg19920312 ZHANG Changmin. Hierarchy analysis in reservoir researches[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 1992, 13(3):344-350. doi:10.11743/ogg19920312
[19] 尹太举,张昌民,张同国. 储层结构控制下的开发响应特征初探——以双河油田为例[J]. 地质科技情报,2006,25(3):51-56. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7849.-2006.03.009 YIN Taiju, ZHANG Changmin, ZHANG Tongguo. Reservoir architecture and its controls on exploration[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2006, 25(3):51-56. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7849.2006.03.009
[20] 吴胜和,翟瑞,李宇鹏. 地下储层构型表征:现状与展望[J]. 地学前缘, 2012, 19(2):15-23. WU Shenghe, ZHAI Rui, LI Yupeng. Subsurface reservoir architecture characterization:Current status and prospects[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2012, 19(2):15-23.
[21] 张昌民,尹太举,赵磊,等. 辫状河储层内部建筑结构分析[J]. 地质科技情报, 2013, 32(4):7-13. ZHANG Changmin, YIN Taiju, ZHAO Lei, et al. Reservoir architecture analysis of braided channel[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2013, 32(4):7-13.
[22] WEBBER K J, GEUNS L C V. Framework for constructing clastic reservoir simulation models[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1990, 42(10):1248-1297. doi:10.-2118/19582-PA
[23] 裘亦楠. 碎屑岩储层沉积基础[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社, 1987:14-20.
[24] 李伟强,尹太举,邓智浩,等. 萨尔图油田北二西区密闭取心井水洗特征[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2016, 23(1):101-106. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-9603.2016.01.016 LI Weiqiang, YIN Taiju, DENG Zhihao, et al. Waterflooding characteristics of sealed coring wells in Beierxi area of Saertu Oilfield[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2016, 23(1):101-106. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-9603.2016.01.016
[25] 计秉玉,李彦兴. 喇萨杏油田高含水期提高采收率的主要技术对策[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2004, 23(5):47-53. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-3754.2004.05.014 JI Bingyu, LI Yanxing. Main technical countermeasures of enhanced oil recovery during high water cut stage in LaSa-Xing reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2004, 23(5):47-53. doi:10.3969/-j.issn.1000-3754.2004.05.014
[26] SHEPHERD M. Oilfield production geology:Where hydrocarbons can be left behind[M]. AAPG, 2009:211-215.

辫状河储层内部建筑结构及剩余油分布研究

Study on the Reservoir Architecture and Remaining Oil Distribution of Braided Channel

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	牟中海, 刘雪, 常琳, 苏秋, 吴千然. 薄互层型沉积体储层构型建模[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(3): 1-12.
[2]	熊钰, 刘成, 周文胜, 刘晨, 钟浩. 物性结构差对9点井网排状加密前后影响研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(3): 80-96.
[3]	赵汉卿, 郭诚, 陈晓明, 刘超, 张博. 垦利A油田辫状河三角洲前缘优质储层特征[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(5): 21-32.
[4]	刘建华, 汪利兵, 赵靖康, 张俊, 孟云涛. PL油田浅水辫状河三角洲隔夹层精细表征方法[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(5): 10-20.
[5]	曹鹏, 戴传瑞, 张超, 常少英, 刘江丽. 英买X1白云岩油藏非均质性定量表征及建模研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(1): 18-32.
[6]	万琼华, 罗伟, 梁杰, 陈晨, 杨秋飞. 基于储层构型的流动单元渗流屏障级次研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(1): 77-84.
[7]	何金钢, 王洪卫. 三类油层压裂驱油技术设计及效果研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 40(5): 95-104.
[8]	田博, 李云鹏, 贾晓飞, 张雪芳, 张瑞. 渤海SZ油田剩余油控制因素及挖潜策略研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 40(5): 28-36.
[9]	张广权, 胡向阳, 贾超, 刘彬, 刘建党. 杭锦旗地区辫状河定量地质知识库建立及应用[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 40(4): 79-89.
[10]	王敏, 赵国良, 孙天建, 黄彤飞. 分汊与游荡型辫状河隔夹层层次结构特征[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(6): 69-77.
[11]	曹鹏, 戴传瑞, 马慧, 闫晓芳, 常少英. 白云岩油藏低渗透条带对剩余油分布的影响[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(5): 143-154.
[12]	葛家旺, 朱筱敏, 陶文芳, 黎明, 葛德发. 惠州凹陷HZ25转换带构造特征与成藏条件[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(5): 19-30.
[13]	肖康, 穆龙新, 姜汉桥, 李威. 水驱优势通道下微观潜力分布及改变流线挖潜[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(5): 92-100.
[14]	张宏奇, 刘扬, 王志华, 徐萌萌. 高浓度聚驱采出液乳化行为及电化学脱水方法[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(1): 177-184.
[15]	尹楠鑫, 李存贵, 李中超, 熊运斌, 罗亚男. 塔中16含砾砂岩段隔夹层对油水分布的影响[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 38(6): 25-34.