黄陵地区延长组长6段深水砂岩储层特征分析

doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2020.02.22.01

西南石油大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (1): 53-65.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2020.02.22.01

黄陵地区延长组长₆段深水砂岩储层特征分析

杨莎莎¹, 黄旭日², 贾继生³, 武志学³, 李伟华⁴

1. 西京学院土木工程学院，陕西西安 710123;
2. 西南石油大学地球科学与技术学院，四川成都 610500;
3. 咸阳川庆鑫源工程技术有限公司，陕西西安 710018;
4. 中国石油长庆油田分公司勘探开发研究院，陕西西安 710018

收稿日期:2020-02-22 发布日期:2022-01-25
通讯作者: 杨莎莎，E-mail：515374102@qq.com
作者简介:杨莎莎，1988年生，女，汉族，陕西西安人，副教授，博士，主要从事沉积学、储层地质学方面的研究工作。E-mail：515374102@qq.com;
黄旭日，1965年生，男，汉族，广西灵川人，教授，博士，博士生导师，主要从事储层描述、油藏地球物理方面的研究工作。E-mail：xrhuang@sunrisepst.com;
贾继生，1983年生，男，汉族，甘肃镇原人，工程师，主要从事油气田开发地质及油气井压裂酸化方面的研究工作。E-mail：jiajisheng@cnpc.com.cn;
武志学，1978年生，男，汉族，甘肃武威人，工程师，主要从事油气田开发地质方面的研究。E-mail：wuzhixue@cnpc.com.cn;
李伟华，1982年生，男，汉族，甘肃庆城人，工程师，主要从事油田开发等方面的研究工作。E-mail：liwh_cq@petrochina.com.cn
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项（2016ZX05046）

An Analysis on the Characteristics of Deepwater Sandstone Reservior of Chang 6 Member, Yanchang Formation in Huangling Area

YANG Shasha¹, HUANG Xuri², JIA Jisheng³, WU Zhixue³, LI Weihua⁴

1. School of Civil Engineering, Xijing University, Xi′an, Shaanxi 710123, China;
2. School of Geoscience and Technology, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China;
3. Xianyang Chuanqing Xinyuan Engineering Technology Co. Ltd., Xi′an, Shaanxi 710018, China;
4. Research Institute of Exploration and Development, Changqing Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Xi′an, Shaanxi 710018, China

Received:2020-02-22 Published:2022-01-25

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 以鄂尔多斯盆地黄陵地区延长组长₆段为研究对象，基于区内丰富的钻井取芯、测录井及分析化验资料，对长₆段深水砂岩特征及不同砂体类型储层之间的差异性进行了分析。结果表明，根据砂体形成机制及其构造特征的不同，研究区砂体类型可划分为砂质碎屑流砂体、砂质滑塌砂体及浊流砂体3大类。其中，砂质碎屑流砂体的石英、长石含量及结构成熟度相对较高，储集空间以长石溶孔和残余粒间孔为主，储层物性也明显优于其他两类砂体。进一步分析发现，由于结构成熟度和矿物含量的差异，砂质碎屑流砂体成岩早期抗压实压溶作用更强，中晚期易溶矿物溶蚀增孔、构造破裂增缝等建设性成岩作用也较为强烈，从而决定了砂质碎屑流砂体是研究区最有利的储集岩体。

关键词: 延长组长₆段, 深水沉积, 砂质碎屑流砂体, 储层特征, 储层差异性分析

Abstract: Taking the Chang 6 Member of the Yanchang Formation in Huangling Area of the Ordos Basin as the research object, the characteristics of the deep water sandstone of Chang 6 Member and the differences between different types of sand bodies are analyzed based on the abundant drilling and coring, logging and analysis of laboratory data. The results show that the reservoir rock types in the study area can be divided into three categories: sandy debris flow sand body, sandy slumping sand body and turbidite sand body according to their formation mechanism and structural characteristics. Among them, the content of quartz and feldspar and structural maturity in sandy debris flow sand body are relatively higher. The storage space is dominated by residual intergranular pores and feldspar dissolved pores. The physical properties of the reservoir are also significantly higher than those of the other two types of sand bodies. Further analysis found that due to the difference in structural maturity and mineral content, the compaction and dissolution of sandstone debris flow sand body is stronger in the early stage of diagenesis, and in the middle and late stages, soluble minerals increases pores and rupture increased fractures. It is determined that sandy debris flow sand bodies are the most favorable type of reservoir rock in the study area.

Key words: Chang 6 Member of Yanchang Formation, deep water deposition, sandy debris flow sand body, reservoir characteristics, analysis of reservoir difference

中图分类号:

TE122

杨莎莎, 黄旭日, 贾继生, 武志学, 李伟华. 黄陵地区延长组长₆段深水砂岩储层特征分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 44(1): 53-65.

YANG Shasha, HUANG Xuri, JIA Jisheng, WU Zhixue, LI Weihua. An Analysis on the Characteristics of Deepwater Sandstone Reservior of Chang 6 Member, Yanchang Formation in Huangling Area[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2022, 44(1): 53-65.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2020.02.22.01

http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/Y2022/V44/I1/53

参考文献

[1] ZHU Xiaomin, TAN Mingxuan, DONG Yanlei, et al. Current hot topics of sedimentology: Comment on the 20th international sedimentological congress[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2019, 37(1): 1-16. doi: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2018.185 朱筱敏, 谈明轩, 董艳蕾, 等. 当今沉积学研究热点讨论——第20届国际沉积学大会评述[J]. 沉积学报, 2019, 37(1): 1-16. doi:10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2018.185
[2] MCCAFFREY W, KNELLER B. Process controls on the development of stratigraphic trap potential on the margins of confined turbidite systems and aids to reservoir evaluation[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2001, 85(6): 971-988. doi: 10.1306/8626CA41-173B-11D7-8645000102C1865D
[3] LI Hua, HE Youbin. Research progress on deepwater gravity flow channel deposit[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2020, 22(1): 161-174. 李华, 何幼斌. 深水重力流水道沉积研究进展[J]. 古地理学报, 2020, 22(1): 161-174.
[4] SHANMUGAM G. Deep-water processes and facies models: Implicationsfor sandstone petroleum reservoirs[M]. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2006.
[5] SHANMUGAM G. New perspectives on deep-water sandstones: Origin, recognition, initiation, and reservoir quality[M]. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 2012.
[6] LIU Fen. Sedimentary characteristics and genetic mechanism of gravity flows in Triassic Yanchang Formation of Longdong Area, Ordos Basin[D]. Beijing: China University of Petroleum (Beijing), 2016. 刘芬. 鄂尔多斯盆地陇东地区延长组重力流沉积特征及成因机制[D]. 北京: 中国石油大学(北京), 2016.
[7] LI Xiangbo, LIU Huaqing, WAN Yanrong, et al. First discovery of the sandy debris flow from the Triassic Yanchang Formation, Ordos Basin[J]. Lithologic reservoirs, 2009, 21(4): 19-21. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2009.04.003 李相博, 刘化清, 完颜容, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地三叠系延长组砂质碎屑流储集体的首次发现[J]. 岩性油气藏, 2009, 21(4): 19-21. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8926.2009.04.003
[8] QIN Yanqun, WAN Lunkun, JI Zhifeng, et al. Progress of research on deep-water mass-transport deposits[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2018, 39(1): 140-152. doi: 10.11743/ogg20180114 秦雁群, 万仑坤, 计智锋, 等. 深水块体搬运沉积体系研究进展[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2018, 39(1): 140-152. doi:10.11743/ogg20180114
[9] LI Xiangbo, WEI Pingsheng, LIU Huaqing, et al. Discussion on the classification of sediment gravity flow and the deep-water sedimentary model[J]. Geological review, 2013, 59(4): 607-614. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0371- 5736.2013.04.002 李相博, 卫平生, 刘化清, 等. 浅谈沉积物重力流分类与深水沉积模式[J]. 地质论评, 2013, 59(4): 607-614. doi:10.3969/j.issn.0371-5736.2013.04.002
[10] GAO Hongcan, ZHENG Rongcai, WEI Qinlian, et al. Reviews on fluid properties and sedimentary characteristics of debris flows and turbidity currents[J]. Advances in Earth Science, 2012, 27(8): 815-827. doi: 10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2012.08.0815 高红灿, 郑荣才, 魏钦廉, 等. 碎屑流与浊流的流体性质及沉积特征研究进展[J]. 地球科学进展, 2012, 27(8): 815-827. doi:10.11867/j.issn.1001-8166.2012.08.0815
[11] LI Xiangbo, LIU Huaqing, PAN Shuxin, et al. The past, present and future of research on deep-water sedimentary gravity flow in lake basins of China[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2019, 37(5): 904-921. doi: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2018.193 李相博, 刘化清, 潘树新, 等. 中国湖相沉积物重力流研究的过去、现在与未来[J]. 沉积学报, 2019, 37(5): 904-921. doi:10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2018.193
[12] CHEN Quanhong, LI Wenhou, GUO Yanqin, et al. Turbidite systems and the significance of petroleum exploration of Yanchang Formation in the southern Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2006, 80(5): 656-663. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:0001-5717.2006.05.004 陈全红, 李文厚, 郭艳琴, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部延长组浊积岩体系及油气勘探意义[J]. 地质学报, 2006, 80(5): 656-663. doi:10.3321/j.issn:0001-5717.2006.05.004
[13] CHEN Quanhong, LI Wenhou, GAO Yongxiang, et al. Significance of deep lake sedimentation and hydrocarbon accumulation in Yanchang Formation of Upper Triassic in Ordos Basin[J]. Science in China (Earth Science), 2007(S1): 39-48. 陈全红, 李文厚, 高永祥, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地上三叠统延长组深湖沉积与油气聚集意义[J]. 中国科学(地球科学), 2007(S1): 39-48.
[14] LIU Xixiang. The study of origin and reservoir controling facters in deep water sandstone in Chang 7-Chang 6 Formation (Late Triassic) southern Ordos Basin[D]. Chengdu: Southwest Petroleum University, 2017. 刘曦翔. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部三叠系延长组长7——长6段深水砂体成因与储层主控因素研究[D]. 成都: 西南石油大学, 2017.
[15] RAN Yixuan, ZHOU Xiang. Sedimentary characteristics and petroleum geological significance of the Chang 6 gravity flow in the southwest Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2020, 38(3): 571-579. doi: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2019.056 冉逸轩, 周翔. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南部延长组长6段重力流沉积特征及其油气地质意义[J]. 沉积学报, 2020, 38(3): 571-579. doi:10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2019.056
[16] YANG Renchao, YIN Wei, FAN Aiping, et al. Fine-grained, lacustrine gravity-flow deposits and their hydrocarbon significance in the Triassic Yanchang Formation in southern Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2017, 19(5): 791-806. doi: 10.7605/gdlxb.2017.05.062 杨仁超, 尹伟, 樊爱萍, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部三叠系延长组湖相重力流沉积细粒岩及其油气地质意义[J]. 古地理学报, 2017, 19(5): 791-806. doi:10.7605/gdlxb.2017.05.062
[17] SUN Ningliang, ZHONG Jianhua, WANG Shubao, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and petroleum geologic significance of deep-water gravity flow of the Triassic Yanchang Formation in southern Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2017, 19(2): 299-314. doi: 10.7605/gdlxb.2017.02.023 孙宁亮, 钟建华, 王书宝, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部三叠系延长组深水重力流沉积特征及其石油地质意义[J]. 古地理学报, 2017, 19(2): 299-314. doi:10.7605/gdlxb.2017.02.023
[18] YANG Junjie. Tectonic evolution and oil-gas reserviors distribution in Ordos Basin[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2002. 杨俊杰. 鄂尔多斯盆地构造演化与油气分布规律[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2002.
[19] YANG Hua, DENG Xiuqin. Deposition of Yanchang Formation deep-water sandstone under the control of tectonic events, Ordos Basin[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2013, 40(5): 513-520. doi: 10.11698/PED.2013.05.01 杨华, 邓秀芹. 构造事件对鄂尔多斯盆地延长组深水砂岩沉积的影响[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2013, 40(5): 513-520. doi:10.11698/PED.2013.05.01
[20] YANG Hua, LIU Ziliang, ZHU Xiaomin, et al. Provenance and despositional systems of the Upper Trisssic Yanchang Formation in the southwestern Orders Basin, China[J]. Earth Science Frontiers, 2013, 20(2): 10-18. 杨华, 刘自亮, 朱筱敏, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南缘上三叠统延长组物源与沉积体系特征[J]. 地学前缘, 2013, 20(2): 10-18.
[21] FU Jinhua, DENG Xiuqin, CHU Meijuan, et al. Features of deepwater lithofacies, Yanchang Formation in Ordos Basin and its petroleum significance[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2013, 31(5): 928-938. 付金华, 邓秀芹, 楚美娟, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地延长组深水岩相发育特征及其石油地质意义[J]. 沉积学报, 2013, 31(5): 928-938.
[22] CHEN Fei, HU Guangyi, SUN Lichun. Characteristics of sedimentary facies and evolution in sequence stratigraphic framework of the Upper Triassic Yanchang Formation in southern Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2012, 14(3): 321-330. doi: 10.7605/gdlxb.2012.03.006 陈飞, 胡光义, 孙立春, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部上三叠统延长组层序地层格架内沉积相特征与演化[J]. 古地理学报, 2012, 14(3): 321-330. doi:10.7605/gdlxb.2012.03.006
[23] LI Keyong, XIONG Shan, NIU Binli, et al. The main controlling factors of gravity flow of the Upper Triassic in the southern Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of Northwest University (Natural Science Edition), 2018, 48(4): 603-610. doi: 10.16152/j.cnki.xdxbzr.2018-04-016 李克永, 熊山, 牛斌莉, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地南部上三叠统重力流沉积的主控因素[J]. 西北大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 48(4): 603-610. doi:10.16152/j.cnki.xdxbzr.2018-04-016
[24] 刘芬, 朱筱敏, 李洋, 等. 鄂尔多斯湖盆西南部晚三叠世深水坡折特征及其对砂体的控制[J]. 高校地质学报, 2015, 21(4): 674-684. doi:10.16108/j.issn1006-7493.2105051
[25] LI Xiangbo, LIU Huaqing, ZHANG Zhongyi, et al. "Argillaceous parcel" structure: A direct evidence of debris flow origin of deep-water massive sandstone of Yanchang Formation, Upper Triassic, the Ordos Basin[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2014, 32(4): 611-622. 李相博, 刘化清, 张忠义, 等. 深水块状砂岩碎屑流成因的直接证据: "泥包砾"结构——以鄂尔多斯盆地上三叠统延长组研究为例[J]. 沉积学报, 2014, 32(4): 611-622.
[26] GAO Shusheng, HU Zhiming, LIU Huaxun, et al. Microscopic pore characteristics of different lithological reservoirs[J]. Acta Petroleum Sinica, 2016, 37(2): 248-256. doi: 10.7623/syxb201602012 高树生, 胡志明, 刘华勋, 等. 不同岩性储层的微观孔隙特征[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(2): 248-256. doi:10.7623/syxb201602012
[27] WANG Jiping, ZHANG Chengwei, LI Jianyang, et al. Tight sandstone gas reservoirs in the Sulige Gas Field: Development understandings and stable-production proposals[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2021, 41(2): 100-110. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2021.02.012 王继平, 张城玮, 李建阳, 等. 苏里格气田致密砂岩气藏开发认识与稳产建议[J]. 天然气工业, 2021, 41(2): 100-110. doi:10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2021.02.012
[28] LAI Jin, WANG Guiwen, MENG Chenqing, et al. Pore structure characteristics and formation mechanisms analysis of tight gas sandstones[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2015, 30(1): 217-227. doi: 10.6038/pg20150133 赖锦, 王贵文, 孟辰卿, 等. 致密砂岩气储层孔隙结构特征及其成因机理分析[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2015, 30(1): 217-227. doi:10.6038/pg20150133
[29] PENG Jun, ZHANG Hanbing, LU Ming, et al. Diagenesis and porosity evolution of Kepingtage Formation in Shuntuoguole Block[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2016, 38(4): 173-182. doi: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2015.12.28.03 彭军, 张涵冰, 鲁明, 等. 顺托果勒柯坪塔格组储层成岩作用与孔隙演化[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 38(4): 173-182. doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2015.12.28.03

黄陵地区延长组长₆段深水砂岩储层特征分析

An Analysis on the Characteristics of Deepwater Sandstone Reservior of Chang 6 Member, Yanchang Formation in Huangling Area

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	余浩杰, 钟寿康, 李浮萍, 薛雯, 田清华. 苏里格气田马家沟组膏模孔型储层特征及成因[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(3): 71-80.
[2]	程乐利, 白林坤, 韦少校, 熊亭, 印森林. 北羌塘拗陷巴贡组致密砂岩储层特征及控制因素[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(2): 10-22.
[3]	谢日彬, 李海涛, 杨勇, 刘远志, 曲长伟. 珠江口盆地礁灰岩储层特征精细表征[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(2): 23-35.
[4]	侯明才, 陈扬, 王粤川, 高坤顺. 渤中22-1构造碳酸盐岩储层岩溶识别及影响因素[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(1): 17-29.
[5]	钱海涛, 张翔, 卞保力, 刘海磊, 张孟刚. 玛南斜坡下乌尔禾组砾岩储层特征及主控因素[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(1): 41-50.
[6]	彭先, 彭军, 张连进, 林攀, 兰雪梅. 双鱼石构造栖霞组白云岩储层特征及主控因素[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(5): 1-12.
[7]	魏华动, 石桂鹏, 朱秀香, 张云峰, 王振宇. 塔中西部良里塔格组台缘台内礁滩储层差异性[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(5): 25-38.
[8]	王伟东, 彭军, 夏青松, 段冠一, 孙恩慧. 川北大安寨生屑灰岩储层主控因素及预测思路[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(4): 13-21.
[9]	王国亭, 孙建伟, 黄锦袖, 韩江晨, 朱玉杰. 神木气田低渗致密储层特征与水平井开发评价[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(5): 1-9.
[10]	夏志远, 李森明, 庞皓, 李文研. 咸化湖盆过渡相组沉积控储作用浅析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(4): 12-22.
[11]	张哨楠, 黄柏文, 隋欢, 叶宁, 李映涛. 古城地区鹰山组储层特征及成岩孔隙演化[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(1): 33-46.
[12]	王剑. 陆西地区清水河组一段储层特征及差异性分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 40(1): 22-34.
[13]	秦川, 余谦, 刘伟, 闫剑飞, 张海全. 黔北地区牛蹄塘组富有机质泥岩储层特征[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(4): 13-24.
[14]	杨西燕, 包洪平, 任军峰, 马占荣. 鄂尔多斯盆地马五₅白云岩储层特征及主控因素[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(2): 27-34.
[15]	兰叶芳, 黄思静, 周小康, 马永坤. 珠江口盆地珠江组碳酸盐岩储层质量评价[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(1): 12-24.