国外枯竭气藏型储气库重大事故经验与启示

doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2022.05.26.03

西南石油大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2022, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (6): 114-120.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2022.05.26.03

国外枯竭气藏型储气库重大事故经验与启示

张哲¹, 徐长峰¹, 赵勇², 陈月娥¹, 张新鹏¹

1. 中国石油新疆油田储气库有限公司, 新疆克拉玛依 834000;
2. 中油(新疆)石油工程有限公司, 新疆克拉玛依 834000

收稿日期:2022-05-26 出版日期:2022-12-10 发布日期:2023-01-16
通讯作者: 张哲,E-mail:346377763@qq.com
作者简介:张哲,1984年生,男,满族,黑龙江宝清人,工程师,主要从事天然气和储气库工艺方面的研究工作。E-mail:346377763@qq.com
徐长峰,1981年生,男,汉族,山东平邑人,高级工程师,主要从事储气库生产运行的管理和技术工作。E-mail:27718823@qq.com
赵勇,1991年生,男,汉族,新疆乌鲁木齐人,工程师,主要从事石油化工工程造价方面的研究工作。E-mail:z904032401@qq.com
陈月娥,1986年生,女,汉族,新疆呼图壁人,高级工程师,主要从事储气库地面工程技术方面的研究。E-mail:526808762@qq.com
张新鹏,1991年生,男,汉族,河南周口人,工程师,主要从事天然气、储气库运行技术方面的研究工作。E-mail:1453733173@qq.com

Experience and Enlightenment of Major Accidents in Underground Gas Storages Rebuilt from Depleted Gas Reservoir Abroad

ZHANG Zhe¹, XU Changfeng¹, ZHAO Yong², CHEN Yue'e¹, ZHANG Xinpeng¹

1. Xinjiang Oilfield Gas Storage Co. Ltd., PetroChina, Karamay, Xinjiang 834000, China;
2. PetroChina (Xinjiang) Petroleum Engineering Co. Ltd., Karamay, Xinjiang 834000, China

Received:2022-05-26 Online:2022-12-10 Published:2023-01-16

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 目前，中国正处于天然气地下储气库建设的初级阶段，在事故预防、应急与处理等方面经验存在不足。为此，开展了国外地下储气库泄漏事故调研，统计了地下储气库发生事故概率，并分析了主要原因及其危害，以期指导中国储气库安全平稳运行。研究结果表明，气藏型地下储气库发生事故概率最高，危害性最大；主要事故类型包括地面设施损坏、圈闭密封性破坏及井筒完整性失效3种。按照事故发生频次分别为地面设施、圈闭、井筒；按事故危害程度分别为圈闭、井筒、地面设施。在重点剖析了国外气藏型储气库典型泄漏案例后分析认为，应重视储气库圈闭密封性的动态监测；选址评价时应重点开展断裂与老井密封性评价。最后，结合中国储气库建设发展现状，提出了5点建议以期为中国地下储气库高效建设、安全运行提供重要保障。

关键词: 气藏型地下储气库, 统计数据, 圈闭密封性, 事故概率, 应急体系

Abstract: Apparently, China is in the primary stage of underground gas storage construction. Experiences in accident preventions and emergency treatments are insufficient. The study of leaking accidents of foreign underground gas storages have been investigated. Analyzing the probability of leaking accidents, main causes and damages of those underground gas storages is a proper method for guiding China's stable and safe underground gas storages operation. The results of study indicate that storage in gas fields is of the highest accident probability with the greatest damage, and that the main types of accidents include surface facilities damage, trap sealing and wellbore integrity failure. The frequency of accidents from the highest to the lowest is the surface facilities, wellbore and trap. The extent of accident damages from the highest to the lowest is the trap, wellbore and surface facilities. Secondly, this paper focuses on the typical leakage cases of foreign storage in gas fields, and concluded that dynamic monitoring of trap sealing in underground gas storages is significant, and evaluating the fractures and old wells sealing condition are of top priorities during the site selection evaluation. In relation to the current constructing and developing situation of underground gas storages in China, five suggestions are proposed to provide an essential guarantee for the efficient construction and safe operation of underground gas storages in China.

Key words: underground gas storage in gas filed, statistical data, trap sealing, accident probability, emergency system

中图分类号:

TE822

张哲, 徐长峰, 赵勇, 陈月娥, 张新鹏. 国外枯竭气藏型储气库重大事故经验与启示[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 44(6): 114-120.

ZHANG Zhe, XU Changfeng, ZHAO Yong, CHEN Yue'e, ZHANG Xinpeng. Experience and Enlightenment of Major Accidents in Underground Gas Storages Rebuilt from Depleted Gas Reservoir Abroad[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2022, 44(6): 114-120.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2022.05.26.03

http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/Y2022/V44/I6/114

参考文献

[1] 王者超, 李葳, 刘杰, 等. 地下储气库发展现状与安全事故原因综述[J]. 隧道与地下工程灾害防治, 2019, 1(2):49-58. WANG Zhechao, LI Wei, LIU Jie, et al. A review on state-of-the-art of underground gas storage and causes of typical accidents[J]. Hazard Control in Tunnelling and Underground Engineering, 2019, 1(2):49-58.
[2] GORYL L. Triennium work reports June 2018, 27th world gas conference[R]. Washington DC:International Gas Union, 2018.
[3] 郑雅丽, 邱小松, 赖欣, 等. 气藏型地下储气库地质体注采运行风险分级与管控[J]. 天然气工业, 2022, 42(3):114-119. doi:10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2022.03.013 ZHENG Yali, QIU Xiaosong, LAI Xin, et al. Risk classification and control of gas-storage geological body of gas reservoir type during injection, production and operation[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2022, 42(3):114-119. doi:10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2022.03.013
[4] 谭羽非. 天然气地下储气库技术及数值模拟[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社, 2007. TAN Yufei. Underground gas storage technology and numerical simulation[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2007.
[5] 丁国生, 谢萍. 中国地下储气库现状与发展展望[J]. 天然气工业, 2006, 26(6):111-113. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0976.2006.06.036 DING Guosheng, XIE Ping. Current situation and prospects of Chinese underground gas storage[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2006, 26(6):111-113. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0976.2006.06.036
[6] 李丽锋, 罗金恒, 赵新伟. 盐穴地下储气库井口破裂火灾事故危险分析[J]. 油气储运, 2013, 32(10):1054-1057. doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2013.10.004 LI Lifeng, LUO Jinheng, ZHAO Xinwei. Analysis of fire risk due to wellhead rupture in underground salt cavern gas storage[J]. Oil & Gas Storage and Transportation, 2013, 32(10):1054-1057. doi:10.6047/j.issn.1000-8241.2013.10.004
[7] 杨石刚, 方秦, 张亚栋. 盐岩地下储气库泄漏的喷射火事故后果定量分析[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报, 2012, 31(9):1846-1853. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6915.2012.09.016 YANG Shigang, FANG Qin, ZHANG Yadong. Consequence quantitative analysis of jet fire caused by gas leakage from underground gas storage in salt rock[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2012, 31(9):1846-1853. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6915.2012.09.016
[8] 谢丽华, 张宏, 李鹤林. 枯竭油气藏型地下储气库事故分析及风险识别[J]. 天然气工业, 2009, 29(11):116-119. doi:10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2009.11.034 XIE Lihua, ZHANG Hong, LI Helin. Accident analysis and risk identification of underground gas storage rebuilt upon the depleted oil and gas reservoirs[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2009, 29(11):116-119. doi:10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2009.11.034
[9] 杨石刚, 方秦, 张亚栋. 盐岩地下储气库泄漏事故后果评价模型研究进展[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2011, 21(8):108-115. doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2011.08.022 YANG Shigang, FANG Qin, ZHANG Yadong. Research progress in consequence assessment models for leakage accidents of underground gas storage caverns in salt rock[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2011, 21(8):108-115. doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2011.08.022
[10] 杨石刚, 方秦, 张亚栋, 等. 盐岩地下储气库泄漏事故及其预防技术分析[J]. 中国安全科学学报, 2014, 24(5):109-114. doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2014.05.001 YANG Shigang, FANG Qin, ZHANG Yadong, et al. Analysis of leakage accident for underground gas storage caverns in salt rock and its prevention technique[J]. China Safety Science Journal, 2014, 24(5):109-114. doi:10.16265/j.cnki.issn1003-3033.2014.05.001
[11] 王起京, 张余, 张利亚. 赴美储气库调研及启示[J]. 天然气工业, 2006, 26(8):130-133. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0976.2006.08.041 WANG Qijing, ZHANG Yu, ZHANG Liya. Researches on American underground gas storages[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2006, 26(8):130-133. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-0976.2006.08.041
[12] 王兆会, 曲从峰, 周琛洋, 等. 基于环空压力的储气库井风险分级及管控程序[J]. 钻采工艺, 2020, 43(6):17-20. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-768x.2020.06.05 WANG Zhaohui, QU Congfeng, ZHOU Chenyang, et al. Risk classification and control procedure of underground gas storage wells based on sustained annular pressure[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2020, 43(6):17-20. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-768x.2020.06.05
[13] STEVE F, EDGAR P, SHABBIR S, et al. U. S. natural gas storage risk-based ranking methodology and results[EB/OL]. (2016-10-01)[2022-05-05]. https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1337151. doi:10.2172/1337151
[14] Energy Information Administration Office of Oil and Gas. USA underground natural gas storage developments:1998-2005[EB/OL].[2022-05-05]. http://www.eia.doe.gov/oilgas.html.
[15] BEREST P. Accidents in underground oil and gas storages:Case histories and prevention[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 1990, 5(4):327-335. doi:10.1016/0886-7798(90)90127-6
[16] AMID A, MIGNARD D, WILKINSON M. Seasonal storage of hydrogen in a depleted natural gas reservoir[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2016, 41(12):5549-5558. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2016.02.036
[17] GUREVICH A E, ENDRES B L, ROBERTSON J O, et al. Gas migration from oil and gas fields and associated hazards[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 1993, 9(3):223-228. doi:10.1016/0920-4105(93)90016-8
[18] RIEGLE J. Gas storage in the Playa Del Rey Oil Field[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1953, 5(10):259-264. doi:10.2118/953259-G
[19] TEK M R. Gas leaks at the Montebello and Playa del Rey converted oilfield gas storage facilities[J]. Memam Assoc Pet Geol, 2001, 11(1):1-9.
[20] 唐晨飞, 张广文, 王延平, 等. 美国Aliso Canyon地下储气库泄漏事故概况及反思[J]. 安全、健康和环境, 2016, 16(7):5-8. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7932.2016.07.002 TANG Chenfei, ZHANG Guangwen, WANG Yanping, et al. The general situation and reflection of leak accident of the Aliso Canyon underground gas storage in United States[J]. Safety Health and Environment, 2016, 16(7):5-8. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-7932.2016.07.002
[21] JACOBSON M Z. Short-term impacts of the Aliso Canyon natural gas blowout on weather, climate, air quality, and health in California and Los Angeles[J]. Environmental Science & Technology, 2019, 53(10):6081-6093. doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b01495
[22] CURTIS L P, BARRY M O, PRESTON M F, et al. Modeling the Aliso Canyon underground gas storage well blowout and kill operations using the coupled well-reservoir simulator T2 Well[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2018, 161(2):158-174. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2017.11.066
[23] THOMPSON D R, THORPE A K, FRANKENBERG C, et al. Space-based remote imaging spectroscopy of the Aliso Canyon CH₄ superemitte[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2016, 43(9):6571-6578. doi:10.1002/2016GL069079
[24] LUKOWSKY L, DER-MARTIROSIAN C, GABLE A, et al. Impact of the Aliso Canyon gas leak on respiratory-related conditions among US department of veterans affairs(VA) users[J]. Disaster Medicine Public Health Preparedness, 2019, 13(3):419-423. doi:10.1017/dmp.2018.83
[25] STUART I A. The rough gas storage field, Blocks 47/3d, 47/8b, UK North Sea[J]. Geological Society London Memoirs, 1991, 14(1):477-484. doi:10.1144/GSL.MEM.1991.014.01.59

国外枯竭气藏型储气库重大事故经验与启示

Experience and Enlightenment of Major Accidents in Underground Gas Storages Rebuilt from Depleted Gas Reservoir Abroad

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	周冬林, 焦雨佳, 杜玉洁, 王立东. 水平对接采卤井腔体溶蚀形态分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(1): 142-148.
[2]	刘鹏程, 余浩杰, 安红燕, 徐文, 朱亚军. 非均质性气藏储气库布井方式优化设计[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(2): 141-148.
[3]	井岗, 何俊, 陈加松, 杨林, 李建君. 金坛盐穴储气库上限压力提高试验[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 40(6): 77-84.
[4]	井岗, 李龙, 巴金红, 刘涛, 陈加松. 实时微地震监测金坛盐穴储气库稳定性[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 40(5): 140-146.
[5]	王元刚, 周冬林, 邓琳, 付亚平, 管笛. 盐穴储气库水溶造腔工艺优化研究与现场应用[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 40(5): 147-153.
[6]	刘继芹, 焦雨佳, 李建君, 施锡林. 盐穴储气库回溶造腔技术研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 38(5): 122-128.
[7]	杨志力;周路彭文利郑金云. BP神经网络技术在声波测井曲线重构中的运用[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 30(1): 63-66.
[8]	熊晓军贺振华文晓涛黄德济. 偏移速度误差引起的假象分析 [J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 29(6): 24-26.
[9]	王道成赵立强刘平礼李闽闪从新. 低渗透非均质油藏径向渗流特征研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 29(5): 72-76.
[10]	付玉郭肖杜志敏刘浪. 考虑裂缝变形的地下储气库数值模拟研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 29(4): 92-94.
[11]	李果梁光川尹平谢云杰. 储气库的储量估算[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 29(4): 158-160.
[12]	杜玉洪; 李苗杜建芬罗玉琼. 油藏改建储气库注采速度敏感性实验研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 29(2): 27-30.
[13]	崔立宏疏壮志杨树合曾顺鹏潭光天. 大张坨地下储气库建设方案 [J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2003, 25(2): 76-79.
[14]	陶春达　战人瑞. 高压注水泵泵头体的有限元分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 1997, 19(2): 55-58.
[15]	孙建华, 周军, 彭井宏, 肖瑶. 文23储气库增压系统性能模拟及优化研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 44(2): 123-134.