页岩储层压裂组合支撑剂导流能力预测模型及应用研究

doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2024.11.12.02

西南石油大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (6): 107-114.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2024.11.12.02

• 川南下寒武统筇竹寺组新类型页岩气高效勘探开发专刊 • 上一篇下一篇

页岩储层压裂组合支撑剂导流能力预测模型及应用研究

郭建春¹, 马健², 曾凡辉¹, 穆轲帆², 赵志红¹

1. 油气藏地质及开发工程全国重点实验室·西南石油大学, 四川成都 610500;
2. 中国石化西南油气分公司工程技术研究院, 四川德阳 610105

收稿日期:2024-11-12 发布日期:2025-03-08
通讯作者: 郭建春,E-mail:guojianchun@vip.163.com
作者简介:郭建春，1970年生，男，汉族，四川南充人，教授，博士，主要从事油气藏增产改造理论与技术研究工作。E-mail:guojianchun@vip.163.com
马健，1987年生，男，汉族，四川南充人，工程师，博士，主要从事油气藏增产理论研究及应用工作。E-mail:majianswpu2010@163.com
曾凡辉，1980年生，男，汉族，四川达州人，教授，博士，主要从事油气藏增产理论与技术方面的研究工作。E-mail:zengfanhui-023024@126.com
穆轲帆，1995年生，男，汉族，重庆江津人，硕士，主要从事油气藏增产理论与技术研究工作。E-mail:2317482614@qq.com
赵志红，1981年生，男，汉族，重庆忠县人，副教授，博士，主要从事低渗、致密油气藏和页岩气储层改造理论与技术研究。E-mail:swpuzzh@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金面上项目(52374045)；国家自然科学基金企业创新发展联合基金(U23B6004)

A Study on the Prediction Model and Application of the Diverting Capacity of Composite Proppants

GUO Jianchun¹, MA Jian², ZENG Fanhui¹, MU Kefan², ZHAO Zhihong¹

1. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China;
2. Engineering Research Institute, Southwest Petroleum Branch, SINOPEC, Deyang, Sichuan 610105, China

Received:2024-11-12 Published:2025-03-08

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 页岩储层通过水力压裂形成长期高导流能力裂缝是低渗透致密油气藏资源有效开发的核心。基于线弹性力学理论，通过改进Kozeny-Carman方程建立了支撑裂缝动态导流预测能力模型，避免了以往模型没有全面考虑支撑剂粒度组成、弹塑性变形、嵌入和蠕变的不足。结果表明，当有效闭合应力为60 MPa时，第1 000天的裂缝导流能力较第100天的裂缝导流能力下降大约54%；在低有效闭合应力下，大粒径支撑剂含量越高，支撑裂缝导流能力越大；当有效闭合应力增大时，加入小粒径支撑剂可以减小裂缝导流能力的下降幅度；支撑剂或裂缝壁面弹性模量越大，支撑剂的变形、嵌入量越小，支撑裂缝导流能力越大；支撑裂缝初始缝宽越大，支撑裂缝中支撑剂铺置层数越多，会减少因嵌入带来的不利影响，裂缝导流能力增加；随着时间、有效闭合应力的增加，支撑裂缝缝宽、导流能力会因支撑裂缝蠕变的影响而逐渐减小。

关键词: 粒度组成, 支撑剂变形, 嵌入, 蠕变, 导流能力

Abstract: This paper develops a comprehensive prediction model for the diverting capacity of propped fractures using an improved Kozeny-Carman equation, incorporating factors such as proppant grain size composition, elastic-plastic deformation, embedment, and creep. The study reveals that fracture diverting capacity decreases by approximately 54% from the 100th to the 1000th day under an effective closure stress of 60 MPa. The presence of larger grain-sized proppants enhances the diverting capacity, especially at lower effective closure stresses. The addition of small grain-sized proppants can reduce the decline in capacity under higher stresses. A higher elastic modulus of the proppant or fracture wall correlates with less deformation and embedment, leading to greater diverting capacity. Additionally, larger initial fracture widths and increased proppant layering can improve capacity by minimizing embedment effects. The model also indicates that over time and with increased effective closure stress, fracture width and diverting capacity will gradually decrease due to creep.

Key words: grain size, proppant deformation, embedment, creep, diverting capacity

中图分类号:

TE377

郭建春, 马健, 曾凡辉, 穆轲帆, 赵志红. 页岩储层压裂组合支撑剂导流能力预测模型及应用研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 46(6): 107-114.

GUO Jianchun, MA Jian, ZENG Fanhui, MU Kefan, ZHAO Zhihong. A Study on the Prediction Model and Application of the Diverting Capacity of Composite Proppants[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2024, 46(6): 107-114.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2024.11.12.02

http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/Y2024/V46/I6/107

参考文献

[1] LEI Gang, LIAO Qinzhuo, PATIL S. A new mechanistic model for conductivity of hydraulic fractures with proppants embedment and compaction[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2021, 601: 126606. doi: 10.1016/j.jhydrol.2021.126606
[2] LUO Zhifeng, ZHANG Nanlin, ZHAO Liqiang, et al. Modeling of pressure dissolution, proppant embedment, and the impact on long-term conductivity of propped fractures[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, 186: 106693. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106693
[3] CHEN Dong, YE Zhihui, PAN Zhejun, et al. A permeability model for the hydraulic fracture filled with proppant packs under combined effect of compaction and embedment[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2017, 149: 428-435. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2016.10.045
[4] KATENDE A, O'CONNELL L, RICH A, et al. A comprehensive review of proppant embedment in shale reservoirs: Experimentation, modeling and future prospects[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2021, 95: 104143. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2021.104143
[5] LIU Yuxuan, MU Shuxing, GUO Jianchun, et al. Analytical model for fracture conductivity with multiple particle sizes and creep deformation[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2022, 102: 104607. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2022.104607
[6] RYBACKI E, HERRMANN J, WIRTH R, et al. Creep of posidonia shale at elevated pressure and temperature[J]. Rock Mechanics and Rock Engineering, 2017, 50(12): 3121-3140. doi: 10.1007/s00603-017-1295-y
[7] SCHMIDT D, RANKIN P E R, WILLIAMS B, et al. Performance of mixed proppant sizes[C]. SPE 168629-MS, 2014. doi: 10.2118/168629-MS
[8] WEI Jianguang, ZHOU Xaofeng, FU Xiaofei, et al. Experimental investigation of long-term fracture conductivity filled with quartz sand: Mixing proppants and closing pressure[J]. International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 2021, 46(64): 32394-32402. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2021.07.083
[9] KONG Debin, GAO Jidong, ZHU Weiyao, et al. Experimental study on conductivity and stress sensitivity of fully supported fractured shale cores[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2022, 218: 110971. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2022.110971
[10] 孟雅，李治平，郭珍珍. 煤储层压裂裂缝导流能力计算模型及应用[J]. 煤炭学报， 2014， 39（9）： 1852-1856. doi： 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2014.8002 MENG Ya, LI Zhiping, GUO Zhenzhen. Calculation model of fracture conductivity in coal reservoir and its application[J]. Journal of China Coal Society, 2014, 39(9): 1852-1856. doi: 10.13225/j.cnki.jccs.2014.8002
[11] LI Haitao, WANG Ke, XIE Jiang, et al. A new mathematical model to calculate sand-packed fracture conductivity[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2016, 35: 567-582. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2016.09.003
[12] LUO Guofan, TIAN Yao, BYCHINA M, et al. Production optimization using machine learning in Bakken Shale[C]. Qingdao: Proceedings of the 6th Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, 2018. doi: 10.15530/URTEC-2018-2902505
[13] CARMAN P C. Fluid flow through granular beds[J]. Chemical Engineering Research and Design, 1997, 75: S32-S48. doi: 10.1016/S0263-8762(97)80003-2
[14] BEARD D C, WEYL P K. Influence of texture on porosity and permeability of unconsolidated sand1[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1973, 57(2): 349-369. doi: 10.1306/819A4272-16C5-11D7-8645000102C1865D
[15] LI Kewen, GAO Yuanping, LYU Youchang, et al. New mathematical models for calculating proppant embedment and fracture conductivity[J]. SPE Journal, 2015, 20(3): 496-507. doi: 10.2118/155954-PA
[16] MATYKA M, KOZA Z. How to calculate tortuosity easily?[J]. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2012: 1453(1): 17-22. doi: 10.1063/1.4711147
[17] NOMURA S, YAMAMOTO Y, SAKAGUCHI H. Modified expression of Kozeny-Carman equation based on semilog-sigmoid function[J]. Soils and Foundations, 2018, 58(6): 1350-1357. doi: 10.1016/j.sandf.2018.07.011
[18] CHAPUIS R P, AUBERTIN M. On the use of the KozenyCarman equation to predict the hydraulic conductivity of soils[J]. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 2003, 40(3): 616-628. doi: 10.1139/t03-013
[19] COSTA A. Permeability-porosity relationship: A reexamination of the Kozeny-Carman equation based on a fractal pore-space geometry assumption[J]. Geophysical Research Letters, 2006, 33(2): 25134. doi: 10.1029/2005 GL025134
[20] GUO Jianchun, LIU Yuxuan. Modeling of proppant embedment: Elastic deformation and creep deformation[C]. SPE 157449, 2012. doi: 10.2118/157449-MS
[21] LIU Yuxuan, MU Shuxing, GUO Jianchun, et al. Model for fracture conductivity considering particle size distribution in a proppant monolayer[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2021, 95: 104188. doi: 10.1016/j.jngse.2021.104188

页岩储层压裂组合支撑剂导流能力预测模型及应用研究

A Study on the Prediction Model and Application of the Diverting Capacity of Composite Proppants

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈迟, 郭建春, 路千里, 慈建发. 致密气藏多尺度支撑机理研究与应用[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 44(3): 131-138.
[2]	杨兆中, 廖梓佳, 李小刚, 朱利勇, 陈浩. 非均布导流下页岩气藏压裂水平井产量模拟[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(3): 93-100.
[3]	叶义平, 钱根葆, 徐有杰, 高阳, 覃建华. 页岩油压裂水平井变导流能力试井模型研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(1): 111-119.
[4]	曹海涛, 关小旭, 李晓平, 赵勇, 余小群. 页岩自支撑裂缝导流能力预测方法研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(5): 134-141.
[5]	张烈辉, 刘沙, 雍锐, 李博, 赵玉龙. 基于EDFM的致密油藏分段压裂水平井数值模拟[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(4): 1-11.
[6]	苟波, 李骁, 马辉运, 周长林. 水力裂缝形貌对酸刻蚀行为及导流能力影响[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(3): 80-90.
[7]	白慧, 田敏, 冯敏, 刘鹏程, 王海涛. 低渗气藏多级压裂水平井产能模型及影响因素[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(3): 113-120.
[8]	侯磊1 *，Derek Elsworth2，孙宝江1，王金堂1. 页岩支撑裂缝中渗透率变化规律实验研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 37(3): 31-37.
[9]	王世洁1，杨志2，赵金洲2，王雷3，张建军3. 塔河超深裸眼分层注水管柱变形计算与对策[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 36(1): 163-169.
[10]	李沁;伊向艺;卢渊;宋毅. 储层岩石矿物成分对酸蚀裂缝导流能力的影响[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2013, 35(2): 102-108.
[11]	王国华;熊继有;薛亮;陈正茂;许红林. 管内压力变化速率对套管强度的影响规律研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 33(6): 105-108.
[12]	焦春艳;何顺利;张海杰;刘华勋. 变导流能力下压裂井生产动态研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2011, 33(4): 107-110.
[13]	辛军郭建春赵金洲崔荣军王健. 砂泥岩交互储层支撑剂导流能力实验及应用[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 32(3): 80-84.
[14]	李小玲. 基于动态图像分析的油田生产监控系统[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 31(2): 155-158.
[15]	王绍先陈学吴文刚熊颖 . 微胶囊固体硝酸酸化液实验研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 30(5): 129-132.