西南石油大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2007, Vol. 29 ›› Issue (6): 153-156.DOI: 10.3863/j.issn.1000-2634.2007.06.038

• 石油机械工程及其它 • 上一篇    下一篇

油管缺陷漏磁场有限元分析

杜志叶 阮江军 余世峰   

  1. 武汉大学电气工程学院,湖北 武汉 430072
  • 收稿日期:2006-10-09 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2007-12-20 发布日期:2007-12-20
  • 通讯作者: 杜志叶

FINITE ELEMENT MODEL OF MFL TESTING FOR OIL TUBE

DU Zhi-ye RUAN Jiang-jun YU Shi-feng

  

  1. School of Electrical Engineering,Wuhan University,Wuhan Hubei 430072,China
  • Received:2006-10-09 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2007-12-20 Published:2007-12-20
  • Contact: DU Zhi-ye

摘要:

采用有限元技术,建立了油管缺陷漏磁场的静态和瞬态仿真模型。通过对励磁磁场的均匀性、检测速度和缺陷尺寸三种影响因素的仿真分析,比较了静磁场模型和瞬态模型的仿真结果和效率。静磁场模型求解效率高、占用的计算资源少,但是随着检测速度的增大,求解结果明显偏高。瞬态模型能降低速度引起的误差问题,但需要大量的计算资源。给出了用静磁场模型分析缺陷漏磁场应满足的条件。

关键词: 漏磁场, 有限元法, 磁化, 静态模型, 瞬态模型, 油管

Abstract:

Using finite element method (FEM), the magnetostatic and transient emulation models of magnetic flux leakage (MFL) of oil tube are established. Parameters of the exciters, inspecting velocity and size of defects are analyzed by using two models respectively. Compared with static and transient simulation results, the limitation that uses magnetostatic model to simulate MFL of defects of oil tube is concluded. When the velocity is over 5m/s, simulating with magnetostatic model suffers somewhat inaccuracy. Although accurate results are usually obtained with transient model, the long elapsed time during the simulation process consumes a lot resources. At last, the conditions of using magnetostatic model to simulate MFL of defects are presented.

Key words: MFL, FEM, magnetization, magnetostatic model, transient model, oil tube

中图分类号: