一种反演水淹层混合水电阻率的新方法

doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2019.10.29.01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 注水开发油田储层水淹后电性特征变化复杂，混合水（注入水和原生地层水的混合液）矿化度不仅受注入水和原生地层水矿化度的控制，还受水淹程度等因素影响，造成混合水电阻率和岩电参数的动态变化，为水淹层的识别和剩余油饱和度的评价带来较大困难。以渤海S油田为例，利用图论多分辨率聚类算法对测井相进行划分，建立了测井相约束下的束缚水饱和度评价模型；根据岩电实验数据讨论了岩电参数随地层水矿化度变化的规律，提出水淹层中胶结指数和饱和度指数与混合水矿化度的函数关系。在此基础上，通过迭代反演得到水淹层剩余油饱和度和混合水电阻率，实现了水淹层的定量评价。研究结果表明：（1）利用图论多分辨率聚类算法可以对测井相进行有效划分，基于测井相约束的束缚水饱和度模型精度高于未分相的结果；（2）水淹层储层胶结指数和饱和度指数随混合水矿化度增大而增大，二者具有明显的幂函数关系；（3）该方法划分水淹层结果与S油田产出剖面测井测量结果吻合率为92.3%，明显提高了水淹层的评价精度。

关键词: 水淹层, 测井相, 束缚水饱和度模型, 岩电参数, 混合水电阻率

Abstract: The changes of electrical properties of water-flooded reservoirs are complex. Salinity of mixed water is influenced not only by the salinity of injected water and primary formation water, but also by the degree of flooding, which will lead to dynamic changes of resistivity of mixed water and electrical properties of rock and will bring great difficulty to the identification of water-flooded zones and the evaluation of remaining oil saturation. S oilfield in Bohai Area is taken as an example to illustrate how to solve the problems mentioned above. First of all, method of logging facies classification is proposed based on the theory of Multi-Resolution Graph-based Clustering and models of bound water saturation is established in different logging facies. Then the variation law of rock electricity parameters with the change of formation water salinity is analyzed on the basis of rock electricity experimental data, and the exponential relationship between m, n and salinity of mixed water in water-flooded zone is raised for the very first time. Finally residual oil saturation and resistivity of mixed water in water-flooded zone is calculated and quantitative evaluation of water-flooded Zone is realised. The main understandings are as follows:(1) logging facies can be effectively classified based on the theory of Multi-Resolution Graph-based Clustering and there is a much higher precise of bound water saturation by the method than the conventional model without logging facies; (2) with the increase of the salinity of mixed water, rock-electro parameters increase obviously in the low salinity area and the growth rate slows down in the high salinity area; (3) the quantitative interpretation results of water-flooded zone are in good agreement with actual production data and fluid yield profile logging results and the total coincidence rate is up to 92.3%, which shows that the evaluation accuracy of water-flooded zone is improved obviously.

Key words: water-flooded zone, well logging facies, model of bound water saturation, rock-electro parameters, resistivity of mixed water

中图分类号:

TE53

张建升, 杨洪伟, 时新磊, 关叶钦, 安玉华. 一种反演水淹层混合水电阻率的新方法[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(1): 133-141.

ZHANG Jiansheng, YANG Hongwei, SHI Xinlei, GUAN Yeqin, AN Yuhua. A New Method for Inversing Mixed Water Resistivity in Water-flooded Zone[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2021, 43(1): 133-141.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2019.10.29.01

http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/Y2021/V43/I1/133

参考文献

[1] 车雄伟. 东辛油田水淹层测井解释模型研究[J]. 钻采工艺, 2012, 35(4):109-111. doi:10.3969/J.ISSN.1006-768X.2012.04.36 CHE Xiongwei. Study on logging interpretation model of water-flooded zone in Dongxin Oilfield[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2012, 35(4):109-111. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-768X.2012.04.36
[2] 申梅英,谭海芳. 濮城油田水淹层饱和度计算参数研究[J]. 测井技术, 2013, 37(1):67-70. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1338.2013.01.014 SHEN Meiying, TAN Haifang. On water-flooded layer saturation calculating parameter in Pucheng Oilfield[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2013, 37(1):67-70. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1338.2013.01.014
[3] 邓少贵,范宜仁. 含油气泥质砂岩薄膜电位理论及其在测井中的应用[J]. 石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 28(5):34-38. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-5870.2004.05.007 DENG Shaogui, FAN Yiren. Membrane potential of oil and gas-bearing shaly sand and its application in petrophysics[J]. Journal of the University of Petroleum, China (Edition of Natural Science), 2004, 28(5):34-38. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-5870.2004.05.007
[4] 王敬农. 混合液电导率的实验室研究[J]. 测井技术, 1985, 9(1):45-49. WANG Jingnong. Laboratory study on conductivity of mixed liquid[J]. Well Logging Technology, 1985, 9(1):45-49.
[5] 杨景强,卢艳,马宏宇,等. 水淹层地层水电阻率变化规律研究[J]. 测井技术, 2006, 30(3):195-197. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1338.2006.03.002 YANG Jingqiang, LU Yan, MA Hongyu, et al. Development law of the water-flooded reservoir resistivity[J]. Well Logging Technology, 2006, 30(3):195-197. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1004-1338.2006.03.002
[6] 申辉林,方鹏. 水驱油地层电阻率变化规律数值模拟及拐点影响因素分析[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2011,35(3):58-62. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5005.2011.03.011 SHEN Huilin, FANG Peng. Numerical simulation of formation resistivity variation in water drive process and analysis of influence factors of inflection point[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2011, 35(3):58-62. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-5005.2011.03.011
[7] 王丽,谭伟,何胜林,等. 基于并联导电模型的水淹层剩余油饱和度评价方法[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2016, 35(2):134-139. doi:10.3969/J.ISSN.1000-3754.2016.02.025 WANG Li, TAN Wei, HE Shenglin, et al. Evaluating method of the remained oil saturation for the wateredout reservoir based on parallel conduction model[J]. Petroleum Geology and Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2016, 35(2):134-139. doi:10.3969/J.ISSN.1000-3754.2016.02.025
[8] 袁伟,张占松,吕洪志,等. 水淹层混合液地层水电阻率的计算方法[J]. 石油天然气学报, 2014, 36(9):78-83. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9752.2014.09.016 YUAN Wei, ZHANG Zhansong, LÜ Hongzhi, et al. Calculating method of formation water resistivity of mixed fluid in water-flooded layer[J]. Journal of Oil and Gas Technology, 2014, 36(9):78-83. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-9752.2014.09.016
[9] 张恒荣,谭伟,何胜林,等. 水驱油实验电阻率分析及混合液电阻率计算新方法[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2018, 33(2):880-885. doi:10.6038/pg2018AA0450 ZHANG Hengrong, TAN Wei, HE Shenglin, et al. Resistivity analysis of water drive oil and the new method of calculating the resistivity of mixed liquid[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2018, 33(2):880-885. doi:10.6038/pg2018AA0450
[10] 时新磊,吕洪志,崔云江,等. 基于图论多分辨率聚类法的测井相划分及渗透率评价——以渤海P油田W井区馆陶组为例[J]. 中国海上油气, 2018, 30(1):80-88. doi:10.11935/j.issn.1673-1506.2018.01.010 SHI Xinlei, LÜ Hongzhi, CUI Yunjiang, et al. Logging facies division and permeability evaluation based on graph theory multi-resolution clustering:A case study of Guantao Formation in Well W Block of P Oilfield in Bohai Sea[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2018, 30(1):80-88. doi:10.11935/j.issn.1673-1506.2018.01.010
[11] 任广慧,王卫萍,葛秋现,等. 马寨油田低电阻率油层测井方法研究[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2003, 38(3):294-296. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-7210.2003.03.016 REN Guanghui, WANG Weiping, GE Qiuxian, et al. Study of well logging method for reservoir with low resistivity in Mazhai Oilfield[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2003, 38(3):294-296. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-7210.2003.03.016
[12] 彭寿昌,许长福,张强,等. 低渗透砾岩油藏含油饱和度解释及水淹层评价[J]. 特种油气藏, 2015, 22(6):108-110. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2015.06.024 PENG Shouchang, XU Changfu, ZHANG Qiang, et al. Oil saturation interpretation and water-flooded zone evaluation in low permeability conglomerate reservoir[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2015, 22(6):108-110. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2015.06.024
[13] YE S J, RABILLER P. A new tool for electro-facies analysis:Multi-resolution graph-based clustering[C]. Society of Petrophysicists and Well-Log Analysts, 2000.
[14] YE S J, RABILLER P. Automated electro-facies ordering[J]. Petrophysics, 2005, 46(6):409-423.
[15] SHI Xinlei, CUI Yunjiang, GUO Xuyang, et al. Logging facies classification and permeability evaluation:Multiresolution graph based clustering[C]. SPE 187030-MS, 2017. doi:10.2118/187030-MS
[16] SHI Xinlei, CHEN Hongbing, LI Ruijuan, et al. Improving permeability and productivity estimation with electrofacies classification and core data collected in multiple oilfields[C]. OTC 29214-MS, 2019. doi:10.4043/29214-MS
[17] TIAN Yu, XU Hong, ZHANG Xingyang. Multi-resolution graph-based clustering analysis for lithofacies identification from well log data:Case study of Intraplatform Bank Gas Fields, Amu Darya Basin[J]. Applied Geophysics, 2016, 13(4):598-607. doi:10.1007/s11770-016-0588-3
[18] 白松涛,程道解,万金彬,等. 砂岩岩石核磁共振T₂谱定量表征[J]. 石油学报, 2016, 37(3):382-391. doi:10.7623/syxb201603010 BAI Songtao, CHENG Daojie, WAN Jinbin, et al. Quantitative characterization of sandstone NMR T₂ spectrum[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(3):382-391. doi:10.7623/syxb201603010
[19] 时新磊,崔云江,许万坤,等. 基于随钻测压流度的地层渗透率评价方法及产能预测[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(1):140-147. doi:10.11698/PED.2020.01.13 SHI Xinlei, CUI Yunjiang, XU Wankun, et al. Formation permeability evaluation and productivity prediction based on mobility from pressure measurement while drilling[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(1):140-147. doi:10.11698/PED.2020.01.13
[20] 陈科贵,温易娜,何太洪,等. 低孔低渗致密砂岩气藏束缚水饱和度模型建立及应用——以苏里格气田某区块山西组致密砂岩储层为例[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2014, 25(2):273-277. doi:10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2014.02.0273 CHEN Kegui, WEN Yi'na, HE Taihong, et al. Irreducible water saturation models of tight sandstone gas reservoirs with low porosity and permeability and its application Taking a block of Shanxi Formation tight sandstone reservoir in Sulige Gas Field as an example[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2014, 25(2):273-277. doi:10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2014.02.0273
[21] 雍世和,张超谟. 测井数据处理与综合解释[M]. 东营:中国石油大学出版社, 1996. YONG Shihe, ZHANG Chaomo. Logging data processing and comprehensive interpretation[M]. Dongying:China University of Petroleum Press, 1996.
[22] 王谦,苏波,宋帆,等. 东河砂岩水淹后岩石物理特性变化规律研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 37(6):47-54. doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2013.11.09.02 WANG Qian, SU Bo, SONG Fan, et al. Study on variation law of rock physical properties after water flooding in Donghe sandstone[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2015, 37(6):47-54. doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2013.11.09.02
[23] 张恒荣,谭伟,王利娟,等. 注水开发油田水淹层岩石电阻率变化规律[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2017, 38(1):85-90. doi:10.7657/XJPG20170115 ZHANG Hengrong, TAN Wei, WANG Lijuan, et al. Variations of rock resistivity in water flooded zones of water injection oilfield[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2017, 38(1):85-90. doi:10.7657/XJPG20170115
[24] 邓少贵,范宜仁,段兆芳,等. 多温度多矿化度岩石电阻率实验研究[J]. 石油地球物理勘探, 2000, 35(6):763-767. doi:10.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000-7210.2000.06.011 DENG Shaogui, FAN Yiren, DUAN Zhaofang, et al. Experiment study of rock resistivity with multi-temperature and multi-salinity[J]. Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 2000, 35(6):763-767. doi:10.13810/j.cnki.issn.1000-7210.2000.06.011
[25] 邓少贵,范宜仁,刘兵开,等. 含油气泥质砂岩导电性研究[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2001, 25(4):30-33. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-5870.2001.04.008 DENG Shaogui, FAN Yiren, LIU Bingkai, et al. Conductivity properties of oil bearing shaly sandstone[J]. Journal of the University of Petroleum, China (Edition of Natural Science), 2001, 25(4):30-33. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1000-5870.2001.04.008