西南石油大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2009, Vol. 31 ›› Issue (6): 37-40.DOI: 10.3863/j.issn.1674-5086.2009.06.007

• 地质勘探 • Previous Articles     Next Articles

THE DISCUSSION AND STUDY ON THE DIVISION METHODS OF FLOW UNIT

GAO Wei1 WANG Yun-cheng1 LIU Hong1   

  1. 1.Research Institute of Exploration and Development,Southwest Branch Company,SINOPEC，Chengdu Sichuan 610081，China;2.State Key Laboratory of Oil/Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation,Chengdu University of Technology,Chengdu Sichuan 610059,China;3.School of Resources and Environment,Southwest Petroleum University,Chengdu Sichuan 610500,China)JOURNAL OF SOUTHWEST PETROLEUM UNIVERSITY(SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY EDITION)，VOL.31，NO.6,37-40,2009（ISSN 1674-5086，in Chinese
  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2009-12-20 Published:2009-12-20

PDF (PC)

648

Abstract: The division methods of flow unit are constantly developing to meet the need of oil and gas field development since the concept of flow unit was put forward first,especially,the method of flowing zone index and the method of pore throat radius (r35) are the most popular ones nowadays.However,through thorough application,the two methods are not adjusted to the practice in the oilfield.Authors of this paper investigate the internal meanings of the methods and discover that the two methods which come from the microcosmic pore structure are different expression forms from one physics property to appraise the flow unit.At the same time,it is thought that only when the continuity,similarity and independence are taken into account to evaluate the flow unit,can the reservoir be evaluated effectively and correctly.

Key words: flow unit, pore-throat radius, continuity, similarity, independence

CLC Number: