大理大学学报 ›› 2022, Vol. 7 ›› Issue (2): 51-56.

• 临床医学 • 上一篇    下一篇

两种方法治疗重度非增殖型糖尿病视网膜病变的疗效分析

刘 腾1,程 飞1,杨品娇12,贾云琴2,韩佩宴2,陶 涛2,段直光2*   

  1. 1.大理大学临床医学院,云南大理 6710002.大理白族自治州人民医院眼科,云南大理 671000

  • 收稿日期:2020-10-22 修回日期:2021-04-29 出版日期:2022-02-15 发布日期:2022-03-29
  • 通讯作者: 段直光,主任医师,E-mail:dzgdl@sina.com。
  • 作者简介:刘腾,硕士研究生,主要从事眼底病研究。
  • 基金资助:
    大理州科技计划项目(大科计〔2017〕号社会发展D2017SA02

Efficacy nalysis of Two Methods in the Treatment of Severe Non-Proliferative Diabetic Retinopathy

Liu Teng1 Cheng Fei1 Yang Pinjiao12 Jia Yunqin2 Han Peiyan2 Tao Tao2 Duan Zhiguang2*   

  1. 1.Clinical College Dali University Dali Yunnan 671000 China 2. Department of Ophthalmology The People's Hospital of Dali Bai Autonomous Prefecture Dali Yunnan 671000 China

  • Received:2020-10-22 Revised:2021-04-29 Online:2022-02-15 Published:2022-03-29

摘要: 目的:评价单纯广泛视网膜光凝术(PRP)和玻璃体腔注射康柏西普联合PRP治疗重度非增殖型糖尿病视网膜病变(NPDR)的临床疗效。方法:将59例(84眼)重度NPDR患者随机分为联合组33例(48眼)和对照组26例(36眼),联合组行玻璃体腔注射康柏西普联合PRP,对照组行PRP,分析比较两组患者治疗后最佳矫正视力(BCVA)、黄斑中心凹厚度(CFT)和生活质量评分。结果:两组患者治疗后BCVACFT均优于治疗前,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);联合组治疗后BCVACFT均优于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);联合组治疗使用的激光能量、光斑数量和能量密度均低于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05);联合组患者生活质量评分高于对照组,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论:康柏西普玻璃体腔注射药物联合PRP治疗NPDR,可以用相对较少的激光能量在较短时间内抑制视网膜新生血管生长、促进黄斑水肿吸收、使患者视功能得到改善,其治疗效果明显好于单纯应用PRP治疗。

关键词:

">非增殖型糖尿病视网膜病变;康柏西普;广泛视网膜光凝术

Abstract:

Objective To evaluate the clinical efficacy of pure panretinal photocoagulationPRP and intravitreal injection of Conbercept combined with PRP in the treatment of severe non-proliferative diabetic retinopathy NPDR. Methods 59 patients 84 eyes with severe NPDR were randomly divided into a combination group of 33 cases48 eyes and a control group of 26 cases 36 eyes. The combination group received intravitreal injection of Conbercept combined with PRP while the control group received PRP. The best corrected visual acuityBCVA), central foveal thicknessCFT and quality of life score between the two groups of patients after treatment were analyzed and compared. Results The BCVA and CFT of the two groups of patients after treatment were better than those before treatment and the differences were statistically significant P<0.05); after treatment the BCVA and CFT of the combined group were better than those of the control group and the differences were statistically significantP<0.05); the laser energy number of spots and energy density used in the treatment of the combination group were lower than those of the control group and the differences were statistically significantP<0.05); the quality of life score of patients in the combination group was higher than that of the control group and the difference was statistically significantP<0.05. Conclusion Conbercept intravitreal injection combined with PRP to treat NPDR can use relatively less laser energy to inhibit the growth of retinal neovascularization promote the absorption of macular edema and improve the visual function of patients in a short time so its therapeutic effect is significantly better than pure PRP treatment.

Key words: font-family:SimSun, ">non-proliferative diabetic retinopathyfont-family:SimSun, ">;font-family:SimSun, "> Conberceptfont-family:SimSun, ">;font-family:SimSun, "> panretinal photocoagulation

中图分类号: