Hypotheses on the Mental Representation of Homophone in Speech Production

J4 ›› 2012, Vol. 11 ›› Issue (2): 31-35.

Hypotheses on the Mental Representation of Homophone in Speech Production

Two hypotheses on the mental representation of homophones in the process of speech production were introduced, that is,the shared representation （SR）hypothesis and the independent representation （IR）hypothesis. The homophone representation hypotheses had an important role for the approach and stage of the lexical access, and had guiding significance on researching of homophones and improving the modern language teaching.

1.Department of Psychology, Hangzhou Normal University, Hangzhou 310036, China;
2. Center for Psychological Application, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China;
3. College of Education, Dali University, Dali, Yunnan 671003, China

Received:2011-11-10 Online:2012-02-15 Published:2012-02-15

Abstract

Abstract:

Key words: homophone, speech production, mental representation, lexical access

CLC Number:

B842.5

References

〔1〕彭聃龄，舒华，陈烜之. 汉语认知研究的历史和研究方法〔M〕//彭聃龄，舒华，陈烜之.汉语认知研究. 济南：
山东教育出版社，1997：3-34.
〔2〕Caramazza A，Costa A，Miozzo M，et al. The specificword frequency effect：Implications for the representation of homophones in speech production〔J〕. Journal of xperimental Psychology：Learning，Memory，and ognition，2001，27：1430-1450.
〔3〕Jescheniak J D，Levelt W J M. Word frequency effects in peech production：Retrieval of syntactic information and fphonologicalform〔J〕.JournalofExperimentalPsychology：Learning，Memory，and Cognition，1994，20：824-843.
〔4〕Dell G S. Effects of frequency and vocabulary type on ponological speech errors〔J〕. Language and Cognitive Processes，1990，5：313-349.
〔5〕Jescheniak J D，Meyer A S，Levelt W J M. Specific-word frequency is not all that counts in speech production：comments on Caramazza，Costa，et al.（2001）and new experimental data〔J〕. Journal of Experimental Psychology：Learning，Memory，and Cognition，2003，29：432-438.
〔6〕Shatzman K B，Schiller N O. The word frequency effect in picture naming：Contrasting two hypotheses using homonym pictures〔J〕. Brain and Language，2004，90：160-169.
〔7〕Levelt W J M，Roelofs A，Meyer A S. A theory of lexical access in speech production〔J〕. Brain and Behavioral Sciences，1999，22：1-75.
〔8〕Caramazza A. How many levels of processing are there in lexical access〔J〕.Cognitive Neuropsychology，1997，14（1）：177-208.
〔9〕Caramazza A，Miozzo M.The relation between syntactic and phonological knowledge in lexical access：evidence from the“tip-of-the-tongue”phenomenon〔J〕. Cognition，1997，68：309-343.
〔10〕Caramazza A，Miozzo M.More is not always better：A rsponse to Roelofs，Meyer，& Levelt〔J〕. Cognition，1998，69：231-241.
〔11〕Caramazza A，Bi Y，Costa A，et al.What determines the speed of lexical access：homophone or specific-word frequency? A reply to Jescheniak et al.（2003）〔J 〕. Journal of Experimental Psychology：Learning，Memory，and Cognition，2004，30：278-282.
〔12〕Costa A，Colome angels，Caramazza A. Lexical access in
speech production：the bilingual case〔J〕. Psicol佼gica，
2001，21：403-437.
〔13〕张清芳，杨玉芳. 言语产生中的词汇通达理论〔J〕. 心理科学进展，2003，11（1）：6-11.
〔14〕陈宝国，宁爱华. 汉字识别中的同音字效应：语音影响字形加工的证据〔J〕. 心理学探新，2005，25（4）：35-39.