西南石油大学学报(社会科学版)

• 法学 • 上一篇    下一篇

异化与规制:刑事案件审前公开的内在张力

张太洲   

  1. 福建省南安市人民法院,福建 南安 362300
  • 出版日期:2016-05-01 发布日期:2016-05-01
  • 作者简介:张太洲(1987–),男(汉族),福建福州人,助理审判员,硕士,研究方向:法社会学、司法制度。

Alienation and Regulation: the Internal Tension of Pretrial Publicity of Criminal Cases

Zhang Taizhou   

  1. The People’s Court of Nan’an City,Fujian Province,Nan’an Fujian,362300,China
  • Online:2016-05-01 Published:2016-05-01

摘要:

审前公开是现代法治建设的必然要求。刑事案件总能引起传媒的兴趣,但是当前传媒审前公开呈现出修饰性、非法律理性、用词的创意性、报道的有选择性、信息的先占性等特点。从本质上看,刑事案件审前公开具有内在的张力,主要表现在二元逻辑范式的存在、主动性对被动性的挑战、传媒语言与法律语言的竞合与脱离等,原因在于微观价值追求的冲突、宪法性权利之间的冲突、传媒事实与法律事实的冲突等。国外通过藐视法庭罪模式、模糊性综合评估标准、限制报道模式试图调和这种张力,但大多数国家的效果未尽如人意。基于我国国情,应当保护传媒审前公开的权利,同时设置消极公开与积极公开两种并行模式及其追责范式,并根据司法实践不断调整二者之间的冲突。

关键词: 审前公开, 消极公开, 积极公开, 言论自由, 司法独立

Abstract:

Pretrial publicity is an inevitable requirement of the construction of modern law. Criminal cases always arouse media attention;however,pretrial publicity of media at present demonstrates such characteristics as modification of faets, non-legal reasoning,exaggeration in language use,selective reports and first possession of information. By nature,there is internal intense in the pretrial publicity,which mainly features the existence of binary logic paradigm,the challenge of activity to passivity and the competition and cooperation and separation between media language and law language,etc. The causes are the clashes of micro-value pursuits,clashes among constitutional rights and clashes between media facts and legal facts. Foreign nations have tried to mediate the internal intense through the mode of contempt of court,the fuzziness of comprehensive assessment standard and the restriction of report patterns but failed to get satisfactory results in the majority of nations. Given China’s conditions,media rights to pretrial publicity should be protected,and two parallel patterns of negative and positive publicity and modes of accountability should be established,and the conflict between positive and negative publicity should be adjusted in judicial practice.

Key words: pretrial publicity, negative publicity, positive publicity, freedom of speech, judicial independence

中图分类号: