西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (2): 103-108.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5094.2018.12.24.06

• 理论探索 • 上一篇    下一篇

数量形组合机制的构式考察

闫亚平   

  1. 华北水利水电大学外国语学院, 河南 郑州 450046
  • 收稿日期:2018-12-24 出版日期:2019-03-01 发布日期:2019-03-01
  • 作者简介:闫亚平(1980-),女(汉族),河南固始人,讲师,博士,研究方向:汉语语法、修辞学、功能语言学。
  • 基金资助:
    河南省哲学社会科学规划项目“新时代语境下河南形象构建的话语体系研究”(2018BYY012)。

A Construction Grammar Analysis of the “N.+M.+A.” Structure in Mandarin Chinese

YAN Yaping   

  1. School of Foreign Studies, North China University of Water Resources and Electric Power, Zhengzhou Henan, 450046, China
  • Received:2018-12-24 Online:2019-03-01 Published:2019-03-01

摘要: 随着量词研究的深入,“数+量+形”结构广受学界关注并争议颇多,合理地阐析该结构的产生机制是解决争论的关键。根据构式语法理论,“数+量+形”结构是在原型数量构式“数+量+名”的带动下,出于语言表达的需要和类推机制创新而来。“数+量+形”结构在原型数量构式“数+量+名”构式义的影响和制约下,经过构式压制,表现出与原型数量构式“数+量+名”基本相当的意义,即:“数+量”对“形”进行计量;整个构式是名词性的;“形”在该构式中的语义被“名”物化了,而其词性仍为形容词。因此,“数+量+形”结构的特殊之处不在于“量”,而在于“形”,且其“形容词”的名词性来自整个构式而不是其本身。

关键词: 数+量+形”, 构式, 构式压制, 功能语言, 汉语语法

Abstract: As studies of quantifiers go further, the structure of "N. + M. + A." has been widely concerned by the academic circle and has aroused controversies. The key to the controversies is the formation mechanism of the structure. According to the theory of construction grammar,the paper discusses the formation mechanism of "N. + M. + A.". It demonstrates a similar constructional meaning with the prototype construction "N + M. + N." by construction coercion. That is:(1) "N.+ M." means to measure the "adjective";(2)The nature of the construction of "N. + M. + A." is nominal;(3) "Adjective", which is still an adjective, is nominalized in the construction of "N.+ M. + A.". The special point of the construction "N. + M. + A." is not the "N", but the "A", which is nominalized by the construction.

Key words: “N. + M. + A.”, construction, construction coercion, functional language, Chinese grammar

中图分类号: