西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2009, Vol. 2 ›› Issue (3): 51-56.DOI: 10.3863/j.issn.1674-5094.2009.03.010

• 政治学与法学 • 上一篇    下一篇

台湾地区“宪政改革”对“一个中国”原则的影响

林震   

  1. 武汉大学历史学院,湖北 武汉 430072
  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2009-05-20 发布日期:2009-05-20

THE IMPACT OF TAIWAN′S “CONSTITUTIONAL REFORM” ON “ONE CHINA” PRINCIPLE

LIN Zhen   

  1. College of History,Wuhan University,Wuhan Hubei 430072,China
  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2009-05-20 Published:2009-05-20

摘要:

台湾地区“宪政改革”的特点是:建立了所谓的“总统集权制”;逐渐背离“一中”原则。尽管经过7次“修宪”,台湾地区现行“宪政”秩序中仍然存在“一个中国”的基本结构,这是国家统一的希望和基础。台湾地区从民主化进程一开始就存在着“宪政困境”:在国家统一之前,以台湾地区居民所拥有的部分“制宪权力”进行“宪改”,属于“违宪”,不具备合法性。不坚持“一个中国”原则而坚持所谓“台湾是主权国家”,这个“宪政困境”无解。“公投入宪”尽管设置了未来“修宪”的高门槛,但为“台独”分子彻底毁弃“一中”原则提供了可能性,这就是危险之所在,有可能会将台湾地区的“宪改”引向歧路。

关键词: 台湾地区, “宪政改革”, 两岸关系, “一个中国”原则, 影响

Abstract: The characteristics of “Constitutional Reform” in Taiwan include having established the so-called “Centralized Presidential System” but gradually deviated from “One China” principle. Although undergoing seven constitutional amendments,“One China” principle still dominates the framework of Taiwan′s “Constitutional Order”,which upholds the hope and basis of national reunification. From the very beginning of Taiwan′s democratization,there exists “Constitutional Dilemma”,which can be concluded as follows. First,it is illegal for Taiwanese to amend the “constitution of Republic of China” before Chinese reunification. And no solution to the dilemma can be found if they continue to adhere to the so-called “Taiwan is a sovereign state” instead of “One China” principle. Furthermore,“the referendum for introducing constitutional amendment”,passed by the 7th “constitutional amendment” in 2005,provides the possibility to abandon thoroughly “One China” principle by “Taiwan Independence Power”,and thus Taiwan may be led astray.

Key words: Chinese Taiwan, “Constitutional Reform”, Cross-Straits relations, “One China” Principle, impact

中图分类号: