西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2012, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (6): 36-41.DOI: 10.3863/j.issn.1674-5094.2012.06.008

• 政治学与法学 • 上一篇    下一篇

论我国南海岛礁争端解决的国际法策略 ——从黄岩岛对峙事件切入

姜雪来

  

  1. 安徽财经大学法学院,安徽 蚌埠 233030
  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2012-11-01 发布日期:2012-11-01

International Law Strategy for the Settlement of Dispute aboutthe South China Sea Reefs—Based on the Huangyan Island Confrontation

JIANG Xue-lai   

  1. School of Law,Anhui University of Finance and Economics,Bengbu Anhui 233030,China
  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2012-11-01 Published:2012-11-01

摘要: 对争议领土的确属,可通过战争、政治手段和国际司法程序等途径解决。通过政治手段、国际司法程序解决领土争端,是现代国际法所提倡的。无论使用二者中的哪一种或全部,可通过有效统治、实际占有和条约等国际法及其实践所承认的形式,实现对领土主权的强化,为日后可能的外交谈判或国际司法解决领土争端而占据主动。当前,试图通过政治手段解决我国南海中的领土争端已面临诸多困境,国际司法或已成为选择。为此,我国南海中诸如黄岩岛争议岛礁的主权确属,在使用国际司法程序解决之前,可通过加强有效统治、实际占有及借助条约来实现。我国南海争议岛礁及其海域的权益,可通过上述行为获取优势证据和地位,以进一步确凿主权。

关键词: 黄岩岛, 有效统治, 实际占有, 国际法, 条约

Abstract: The ownership of the disputed territory can be clarified through war,political means and international judicial procedures. Settling the territory dispute through political means and international judicial procedures is advocated by the modern international law. The territorial sovereignty may be strengthened through effective control,actual possession and treaty to dominate the diplomatic negotiations and international judicial process in the future. At present,the international judicial is likely to take the place of the political means to solve the territorial disputes concerning the South China Sea reefs. So the sovereignty of the disputed reef like Huangyan Island in South China Sea can be defined by the above measures before resorting to international judicial procedures. In addition,advantaged evidence for the China’s rights to and interests of the disputed reefs and sea area in South China Sea can be obtained by the above mentioned means,which is conducive to China’s irrefutable sovereignty of this area.

Key words: Huangyan Island, effective control, actual possession, International Law, treaty

中图分类号: