西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2010, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (2): 56-60.DOI: 10.3863/j.issn.1674-5094.2010.02.012

• 政治学与法学 • 上一篇    下一篇

恢复性司法引入问题研究

王光荣   

  1. 四川省华蓥市司法局,四川 广安 638600
  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2010-03-20

A STUDY OF THE INTRODUCTION OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE

WANG Guang rong   

  1. Huaying City Justice Bureau,Guang′an Sichuan 638600,China
  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2010-03-20

摘要: 国内对恢复性司法制度及其理念,尚存有各种不同观点。同时,我国学者目前对该项制度的理解本身存在着认为恢复性司法是个人权利对国家公权的挑战、恢复性司法的目的仅在于将社会秩序恢复到犯罪行为发生以前的状态、强调恢复性司法就意味着排斥刑事司法裁判权等误区。出于对刑事被害人利益保护、对犯罪人有利改造以及节省有限的司法资源之考虑,我国迫切需要引入恢复性司法制度,以解决传统刑事司法的弊端与无奈。恢复性司法以犯罪人和被害人为中心,以修复被损害的社会关系为目的,其制度应与现行刑事司法制度并行,亦应通过立法予以规范。

关键词: 恢复性司法, 报应性司法, 刑事和解, 被害人, 司法改革

Abstract: About whether to introduce restorative justice in China,disagreement still exists,which is generated mainly by such misbelieves that restorative justice encourages individual challenge to government power,that the purpose of restorative justice is only to restore social order before the crime happens and that application of restorative justice means the weakening of criminal jurisdiction.In order to protect the victims′ right,to help recast the criminals and to economize limited justice resources,it is urgent for China to introduce restorative justice,which aims at mending the damaged social relation with victims as the focus of consideration.Such purpose does not go against the present criminal justice system and so deserves to be regulated by law.

Key words: restorative justice, retributive justice, criminal reconciliation, victim, justice reform

中图分类号: