西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2012, Vol. 14 ›› Issue (3): 21-27.DOI: 10.3863/j.issn.1674-5094.2012.03.005

• 社会学 • 上一篇    下一篇

中农治村的发生机理

刘锐   

  1. 华中科技大学中国乡村治理研究中心,湖北 武汉 430074
  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2012-05-01 发布日期:2012-05-01

Mechanism of Middle Peasants Governing Village

LIU Rui   

  1. China’s Rural Governance Research Center of Huazhong University of Science and Technology,Wuhan Hubei 430074,China
  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2012-05-01 Published:2012-05-01

摘要: 随着市场经济的强力渗透和打工经济的兴盛,村庄共同体日趋瓦解,村庄内生规范在维系村庄秩序方面显得乏力;而农村税费改革及相应的乡镇体制改革则使得乡村干部治理能力大大弱化,在维持村庄秩序方面越发消极无为。在后税费时代,乡村社会内部经济分化严重,而村庄并没有道德混乱和社会动荡,这与富人和中农群体的存在并发挥作用有关。通过分析比较中农治村与富人治村的背景、治理机制和治理绩效的差异,指出中农在维持村庄秩序稳定方面更具优势,认为中农应该成为村级治理的主体并得到相应政策支持。

关键词: 内生规范瓦解, 乡村治权弱化, 村庄秩序, 中农治村, 富人治村

Abstract: With the strong influence of market economy and the flourishing of labor economy,village community is gradually collapsing and the endogenous rules become weak in maintaining the order of village. Governance ability of the village cadres is greatly weakened by rural taxation reform and corresponding reform of town and township system,so the village cadres is becoming more and more incapable of maintaining the order of village. In the posttaxation era,the severe differentiation of social economic status in rural areas does not result in moral decay and social turbulence,which is related to the existence and function of the rich and the middle peasants. Through the analysis and comparison of the differences in background,mechanism and the performance of village governing by middle peasants and by the rich,this paper indicates that middle peasants have more advantages in maintaining the stability of rural order,so middle peasants should be the major force of rural governance and they deserve policy support.

Key words: disintegration of endogenous rule, weakening of village’s governmental power, village order, village governing by middle peasant, village governing by the rich

中图分类号: