西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2016, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (5): 51-61.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5094.2016.06.10.01

• 法学 • 上一篇    下一篇

贩卖毒品罪的几个争议问题研究

魏东, 金燚   

  1. 四川大学法学院, 四川 成都 610200
  • 收稿日期:2016-06-10 出版日期:2016-09-01 发布日期:2016-09-01
  • 通讯作者: 金燚(1993-),女(汉族),四川自贡人,硕士研究生,研究方向:刑法学。
  • 作者简介:魏东(1966-),男(汉族),重庆开县人,教授,博士,研究方向:刑法学。

A Discussion on Controversies in Drug Offense Determination

Wei Dong, Jin Yi   

  1. school of law, Sichuan University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610200, China
  • Received:2016-06-10 Online:2016-09-01 Published:2016-09-01

摘要: 在步入风险社会后,法益保护前置化、预备行为实行化进入刑法研究范畴,根据风险刑法原理,“贩卖”毒品的行为应该包括“为卖而买”和“出卖”两种方式;在贩卖毒品数量的计算方面,应按照《武汉会议纪要》的规定,将吸毒者购买的毒品数量作为贩卖毒品数量,并允许被告人反证推翻;在犯罪既遂标准方面,以抽象危险犯和目的犯为视角,提出“目的支配下的实际控制说”;代购行为和居间介绍毒品买卖的行为是否构成贩卖毒品罪,不能采取“一刀切”的方式而应具体问题具体分析,主要看被告人是否具有牟利的目的,牟利不等于总体上收大于支,而在于是否从中获得物质利益与非物质利益等好处。

关键词: 毒品犯罪, 以贩养吸, 法益保护前置化, 抽象危险犯, 目的犯

Abstract: In the current risk society, prepositive legal interest protection and implementation of preparatory behavior have become the subjects of criminal law research. According to the principle of criminal law in risk society," drug trafficking" should cover" buying for selling" and" selling". In the calculation of drug trafficking, according to Wuhan Meeting Minutes, the amount of the drug purchased by the drug addict should be taken as the drug trafficked,and the defendants should be allowed to defend with evidence. When defining the crime of drug trafficking, we should advocate the concept of" actual control by purpose"in distinguishing the offender of abstract danger or offender with intent. In the identification of commissioned purchase and middleman transaction, it is necessary to determine whether there is profit-making purpose and whether the defendant obtains any material or nonmaterial profit.

Key words: drug crime, vendor for taking, prepositive legal interest protection, offender of abstract danger, intent crime

中图分类号: