[1] 郭德忠. 美国药品专利领域反向支付的反托拉斯问题[J]. 北京理工大学学报(社会科学版), 2015, 17(3):156-161. [2] 程永顺,吴莉娟. 创新与仿制的平衡与发展——评Hatch-Waxman法案对美国医药产业的贡献[J]. 科技与法律, 2018(1):1-9. [3] 王鑫,甄橙. 美国Hatch-Waxman法案的缺陷与完善研究[J]. 中国新药杂志, 2018, 27(6):609-614. [4] 曹志明. 药品领域反向支付问题研究[J]. 知识产权, 2017(9):63-66. [5] 郑鹏程. 美国反垄断法"本身违法"与"合理法则"适用范围探讨[J]. 河北法学, 2005(10):122-126. [6] UnitedStates Court of Appeals,Sixth Circuit.IN RE:CARDIZEM CD ANTITRUST LITIGATION[EB/OL]. (2003-06-13)[2020-06-23].https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-6th-circuit/1046873.html. [7] 丁锦希,邵美玲. 美国专利反向支付协议反垄断诉讼适用规则现状研究[C]//中国药学会医药知识产权研究专业委员会.2013年学术年会会议资料. 北京:中国药学会, 2013:5. [8] 丁锦希,邵美令,孟立立. 美国知识产权反垄断诉讼中专利范围测试规则的适用及启示——基于"Schering V.S. Upsher"案实证分析[J]. 知识产权, 2013(6):91-95. [9] United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. SCHERING PLOUGH CORPORATION v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION[EB/OL].(2005-03-08)[2020-06-23]. https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-11th-circuit/1149207.html. [10] 宋建宝. 专利诉讼反向支付和解协议的反垄断审查:美国的规则与实践[J]. 知识产权, 2014(2):91-97. [11] Okada, Seiko, F. In Re K-Dur Antitrust Litigation:Pharmaceutical Reverse Payment Settlements Go beyond the Scope of the Patent[J]. North Carolina Journal of Law & Technology, 2012:303-340. [12] United States Court of Appeals,Third Circuit.IN RE:K-DUR ANTITRUST LITIGATION[EB/OL]. (2012-07-16)[2020-06-23] https://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-3rd-circuit/1606197.html. [13] U.S. Supreme Court.FTC v. ACTAVIS, INC[EB/OL]. (2013-06-17)[2020-06-23]. https://www.law.cornell.edu/supremecourt/text/12-416. [14] 赵歆. 欧盟医药行业专利和解协议的竞争法分析[J]. 科技与法律, 2013(4):32-37. [15] EUROPEAN COMMISSION.8th Report on the Monitoring of Patent Settlements[EB/OL]. (2018-03-09)[2020-06-01] https://ec.europa.eu/competition/sectors/pharmaceuticals/inquiry/patent_settlements_report8_en.pdf. [16] Mélanie Bruneau,Wilko van Weert.EU Court Confirms European Commission's Decision on Pay-for-Delay Agreements[EB/OL].(2016-10-20)[2020-06-23] https://www.antitrustalert.com/2016/10/articles/ecdevelopments/eu-court-confirms-european-commissionsdecision-on-pay-for-delay-agreements/. [17] Dechert LLP.The Servier Judgment:A Breath of Fresh Air for Pharmaceutical Companies?[EB/OL]. (2018-12-21)[2020-06-23]. https://www.jdsupra.com/legalnews/the-servier-judgment-a-breath-of-fresh-19625/. [18] 刘廷涛. 欧盟卡特尔适用规则及豁免规定对中国之启示[J]. 东方法学, 2015(3):134-144. [19] 孙瑜晨. 医药专利反向支付协议的反垄断规制研究——基于美国近十年学术文献的分析[J]. 情报杂志, 2018, 37(10):112-119, 61. [20] 孙华璞. 法律责任竞合理论初探[J]. 人民司法(应用), 2017, 771(4):32-41. [21] 罗毅. 关于垄断协议豁免制度的思考[J]. 价格理论与实践, 2014(5):23-25. [22] 陈兵. 美国药品领域反向支付的反垄断司法经验解读与启示——以反垄断审查规则为线索[J]. 上海财经大学学报, 2018, 20(5):123-138. |