具有腐蚀坑缺陷的套管强度评估

doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2017.06.21.01

西南石油大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (2): 159-168.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2017.06.21.01

具有腐蚀坑缺陷的套管强度评估

练章华, 罗泽利, 于浩, 刘洋, 何勇

“油气藏地质及开发工程”国家重点实验室·西南石油大学, 四川成都 610500

收稿日期:2017-06-21 出版日期:2018-04-01 发布日期:2018-04-01
通讯作者: 练章华,E-mail:cwctlzh@swpu.edu.cn
作者简介:练章华,1964年生,男,汉族,四川自贡人,教授,博士生导师,主要从事CAD/CAE/CFD、计算力学、油气井工程与安全领域的计算机仿真研究。E-mail:cwctlzh@swpu.edu.cn;罗泽利,1988年生,男,汉族,重庆城口人,硕士研究生,主要从事研究油气井工程力学,管柱力学研究。E-mail:793609127@qq.com;于浩,1988年生,男,汉族,山东省威海人,博士研究生,主要从事CAE、套管损坏机理、管柱力学等科研。E-mail:geniusloveyuhao@163.com;刘洋,1985年生,男,汉族,湖北洪湖人,博士,主要研究油气井工程装备与管柱力学研究。E-mail:yangliu851003@sina.com;何勇,1991年生,男,汉族,宁夏中卫人,硕士研究生,主要从事石油井下钻具的设计及仿真工作。E-mail:swpuhy@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（51574198）；国家教育部博士点基金（20135121110005）

Assessing the Strength of Casing Pipes that Contain Corrosion Pit Defects

LIAN Zhanghua, LUO Zeli, YU Hao, LIU Yang, HE Yong

State Key Laboratory of Oil & Gas Reservoirs Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China

Received:2017-06-21 Online:2018-04-01 Published:2018-04-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 近年来，油田套管腐蚀越来越严重，据统计，大港油田某区块套管腐蚀达到34.4%，造成了严重的套损、套漏等问题。基于上述问题，以弹性力学理论和球形腐蚀坑套管力学模型为基础，分别建立了具有两个腐蚀坑缺陷和一个腐蚀坑缺陷的套管-水泥环-地层三维有限元模型，通过具有两个腐蚀坑缺陷的模型对套管上的应力分布规律的研究，发现腐蚀坑之间的距离大于0.65 mm时，可以用具有单个腐蚀坑缺陷模型来评价套管的强度。基于单个腐蚀坑缺陷的模型，研究了腐蚀坑的半径、深度对套管强度的影响及其应力集中系数的变化规律，且研究了不同钢级在地层水化条件下对具有腐蚀坑的套管的受力影响。结果发现，有腐蚀坑缺陷的套管，其最大应力和应力集中系数随腐蚀坑深的增加而增大，且腐蚀坑半径越小，应力集中系数越大，最大达到2.0以上；其次，地层水化后加快具有腐蚀坑的套管的损坏。

关键词: 腐蚀坑缺陷, 应力集中系数, 最大应力, 有限元, 套损

Abstract: The corrosion of oilfield casing pipes has become increasingly severe in recent years. According to statistical data, the corrosion of the casing pipes in each block of the Dagang Oilfield has reached 34.4%, leading to problems such as severe casing damage and leakage. To address this problem, this study constructed three-dimensional finite element models for casing pipe-concrete sheath-ground strata systems with casings that contain either one or two corrosion pit defects based on elasticity theory and mechanical models of casing pipes with spherical corrosion pits. By studying the patterns of stress distribution in casing pipes using the model with two corrosion pit defects, it was found that the model with a single corrosion pit defect could be used to evaluate the casing strength if the gap between the corrosion pits exceeds 0.65 mm. The effects of the corrosion pit radius and depth on the strength of the casing pipes and the variational patterns of a casing pipe's stress concentration factors were studied herein using the single-corrosion pit defect model. The effects of steel grade on the loading of casing pipes with corrosion pitting in hydrated strata were also investigated. Consequently, the maximum stress and stress concentration factors in the casing pipes with corrosion pitting both increased with the increasing corrosion pit depth. The stress concentration factor also increased as the radius of the corrosion pit decreased. The stress concentration factor may exceed 2.0 in certain cases. Furthermore, the strata hydration accelerated the damage of casing pipes that contained corrosion pits.

Key words: corrosion pit defects, stress concentration factor, maximum stress, finite element, casing damage

中图分类号:

TE983

练章华, 罗泽利, 于浩, 刘洋, 何勇. 具有腐蚀坑缺陷的套管强度评估[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 40(2): 159-168.

LIAN Zhanghua, LUO Zeli, YU Hao, LIU Yang, HE Yong. Assessing the Strength of Casing Pipes that Contain Corrosion Pit Defects[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 40(2): 159-168.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2017.06.21.01

http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/Y2018/V40/I2/159

参考文献

[1] COULSON K, WORTHINGAM R. New guidelines promise more accurate damage assessment[J]. Oil and Gas Journal, 1990, 88(16):41-45.
[2] O'GRADY T, HISEY D, KIEFNER J. A systematic method for the evaluation corroded pipelines[J]. Pipelines Engineering, ASME 1992, 46:27-35.
[3] 赵新伟,罗金恒,路民旭. 含腐蚀缺陷管道剩余强度的有限元法分析[J]. 油气储运, 2001, 20(3):18-21. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-8241-D.2001.03.005 ZHAO Xinwei, LUO Jinheng, LU Minxu. FEM analysis on the effect of corroded flaw interaction on remaining[J]. Storage of Line Yipe, 2001, 20(3):18-21. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-8241-D.2001.03.005
[4] 董事尔,何东升,张鹏,等. 双点腐蚀管道的弹塑性有限元分析[J]. 机械, 2005, 32(9):20-22. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-0316.2005.09.008 DONG Shi'er, HE Dongsheng, ZHANG Peng, et al. The elastic and plastic finite element analysis of double points corrosive pipe[J]. Machinery, 2005, 32(9):20-22. doi:10.-3969/j.issn.1006-0316.2005.09.008
[5] SUN K, GUO B, GHALAMBOR A. Casing strength degradation due to corrosion-applications to casing pressure assessment[J]. SPE 88009-MS, 2004. doi:10.2118/-88009-MS
[6] 李春福. 油气开发过程中的CO₂腐蚀机理及防护技术研究[D]. 成都:西南石油学院, 2005. LI Chunfu. Study on mechanic and protection technique on CO₂ corrosion research in the process of oil and gas production[D]. Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University, 2005.
[7] 翟云皓,郭兴蓬,曲良山,等. 集输管道腐蚀评价及剩余寿命预测[J]. 油气田地面工程, 2006, 25(4):47-48. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6896.2006.04.031 DI Yunhao, GUO Xingpeng, QU Liangshan, et al. The corrosion assessment and residual life prediction of gathering pipelines[J]. Oil-Gasfield Surface Engineering, 2006, 25(4):47-48. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1006-6896.2006.04.031
[8] 李继丰. 油井管柱抗CO₂腐蚀技术研究[D]. 大庆:大庆石油大学, 2006. LI Jifeng. The technological research of oil well string resisting corrosion of carbon dioxide[D]. Daqing:Daqing Petroleum University, 2006.
[9] CROLET J L. Acid corrosion in wells(CO₂, H₂S):Metallurgical aspects[J]. SPE 10045-PA, 1983. doi:10.2118/-10045-PA
[10] 周波,崔润炯,刘建中. 增强型13Cr钢抗CO₂腐蚀套管的研制[J]. 钢管, 2006, 35(6):22-26. doi:10.3969/-j.issn.1001-2311.2006.06.005 ZHOU Bo, CUI Runjiong, LIU Jianzhong. R & D of enhancement 13Cr steel anti-CO₂ corrosion oil casing[J]. Steel Pipe, 2006, 35(6):22-26. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-2311.2006.06.005
[11] CAI J H, YAN J Y, YAN J, et al. Carbon dioxide corrosion of a casing steel effect of environments and temperature[C]//Canadian International Petroleum Conference, 13-15 June, Calgary, Alberta, 2006:555-562. doi:10.-2118/2006-194
[12] KINZEL H, KIESS C, WACHS T. New ways of handling and running C. R. A. tubulars prevent corrosion in H₂S and CO₂ environments[J]. Khirurgiia, 2006, 4(12):75-76. doi:10.2118/100181-MS
[13] YAN W, DENG J, DONG X. Experimental study of 3% Cr tubing steel in CO₂ and CO₂/H₂S corrosion environment[J]. Oil & Gas Facilities, 2012, 1(5):43-48. doi:10.-2118/157302-PA
[14] 马颖丽. 几种110钢级套管在酸性油气田的腐蚀行为及防护措施研究[D]. 成都:西南石油大学, 2012. MA Yingli. Study on corrosion behavior and protection methods of several 110 grade casings in sour oil/gas fields[D]. Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University, 2012.
[15] 马晓勇,翟晓鹏,张艺馨,等. 用数理统计方法预测油套管腐蚀剩余寿命[J]. 断块油气田, 2013, 20(4):513-515. doi:10.6056/dkyqt201304027 MA Xiaoyong, ZHAI Xiaopeng, ZHANG Yixin, et al. Using mathematical statistics method to predict remaining life of corroded tubing and casing[J]. Fault-Block Oil & Gas Field, 2013, 20(4):513-515. doi:10.6056/-dkyqt201304027
[16] 李波. 气井井筒的CO₂腐蚀机理及剩余寿命预测[D]. 成都:西南石油大学, 2013. LI Bo. Study on mechanic on CO₂ corrosion and residual life prediction of gas well[D]. Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University, 2013.
[17] 杨茜. 压力管道腐蚀缺陷的非线性有限元分析[D]. 西安:西安石油大学, 2014. YANG Qian. Non-linear finite element analysis for the corrosion defects of pressure pipelines[D]. Xi'an:Xi'an Shiyou University, 2014.
[18] 王利波. 腐蚀管道剩余强度评价及剩余寿命预测软件开发[D]. 西安:西安石油大学, 2014. WANG Libo. The software development for residual strength assessment and residual life prediction of corroded pipelines[D]. Xi'an:Xi'an Shiyou University, 2014.
[19] 孙磊. 三元复合驱套管腐蚀原因及临界剩余壁厚研究[D]. 大庆:东北石油大学, 2015. SUN Lei. A study of the reason for casing corrosion in the asp flooding and the critical residual wall thickness[D]. Daqing:Northeast Petroleum University, 2015.
[20] 刘然克. 典型H₂S/CO₂环空环境下高强油套管钢应力腐蚀机理与防护[D]. 北京:北京科技大学, 2015. LIU Ranke. Stress corrosion cracking behavior and prevention of high strength tubing steels in typical H₂S/CO₂ annulus environments[D]. Beijing:University of Science and Technology Beijing, 2015.
[21] LIN T, ZHANG Q, LIAN Z, CHANG X, et al. Evaluation of casing integrity defects considering wear and corrosionapplication to casing design[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science & Engineering, 2016, 29:440-452. doi:10.1016/j.-jngse.2016.01.029
[22] 林海,许杰,范白涛,等. 渤海油田井下管柱CO₂腐蚀规律与防腐选材现状[J]. 表面技术, 2016, 45(5):97-103. doi:10.16490/j.cnki.issn.1001-3660.2016.05.015 LIN Hai, XU Jie, FAN Baitao, et al. Review on CO₂ corrosion rule of down-hole strings in Bohai Oilfield and current status of anticorrosion material selection[J]. Surface Technology, 2016, 45(5):97-103. doi:10.16490/j.cnki.-issn.1001-3660.2016.05.015
[23] 钟功祥,石强,赵乾坤. 含CO₂油气管道内腐蚀模拟及剩余寿命预测[J]. 表面技术, 2016, 45(11):106-112. doi:10.16490/j.cnki.issn.1001-3660.2016.11.016 ZHONG Gongxiang, SHI Qiang, ZHAO Qiankun. Corrosion simulation inside oil-gas pipelines containing CO₂ and prediction of residual life[J]. Surface Technology, 2016, 45(11):106-112. doi:10.16490/j.cnki.issn.1001-3660.2016.11.016
[24] 万力维. 酸性环境油套管设计及适用性评价[D]. 成都:西南石油大学, 2016. WAN Liwei. Design casing and tubing and fit for purpose in acid enviorment[D]. Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University, 2016.
[25] 徐芝纶. 弹性力学[M]. 北京:高等教育出版社, 2006. XU Zhilun. Elasticity[M]. Beijing:Higher Education Press, 2006.
[26] 李志明,殷有泉. 油水井套管外挤力计算及其力学基础[M]. 北京:石油工业出版社, 2006. LI Zhiming, YIN Youquan. Calculation of casing external pressure and its mechanical basis in oil-water well[M]. Beijing:Petroleum Industry Press, 2006.
[27] TIMOSHENKO S P, GOODIER J N. Theory of elasticity[M]. 2nd Edition. New York:McGraw-Hill, 1951.

具有腐蚀坑缺陷的套管强度评估

Assessing the Strength of Casing Pipes that Contain Corrosion Pit Defects

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	张博宁, 张芮菡, 吴婷婷, 鲁友常. 致密气藏多级压裂水平井生产动态机理分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(5): 107-117.
[2]	林铁军, 李朝阳, 王雪刚, 邓元洲, 宋琳. 三维复杂井眼上提冲放套管屈曲摩阻模拟研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(4): 165-172.
[3]	苟利鹏, 张进科, 杨金峰, 魏江伟, 张倩. 姬塬油田套损井隔水采油技术研究与应用[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(3): 107-114.
[4]	和志明, 伍东. 套损图像特征模式匹配识别技术及应用[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(2): 175-181.
[5]	练章华, 张琎, 王裕海, 张强, 刘永刚. 非等厚度四点弯曲试样环向应力理论研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(1): 161-169.
[6]	练章华, 梁建坤, 王裕海, 张强, 牟易升. C型环环向应力与加载载荷的公式推导与验证[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(5): 161-168.
[7]	薛仁江, 郭建春, 赵志红, 周广清, 孟宪波. 济阳拗陷页岩储层水平井裂缝扩展数值模拟[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(2): 84-96.
[8]	龚迪光, 陈军斌, 曲占庆, 郭天魁. 径向井排引导水力压裂裂缝扩展机理研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 40(5): 122-130.
[9]	刘清友, 何俊江, 毛良杰. 深水钻井隔水管法兰接头压溃安全分析研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 40(5): 163-169.
[10]	陈森, 林伯韬, 金衍, 张磊, 黄勇. SAGD井微压裂储层渗透率变化规律研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 40(1): 141-148.
[11]	尹帅, 丁文龙, 高敏东, 周广照. 樊庄北部3号煤层现今应力场分布数值模拟[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(4): 81-89.
[12]	邓嵘, 安美, 唐东. 复合钻头钻进过程的有限元模拟[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(2): 145-152.
[13]	唐明明, 张金亮. 基于随机扩展方法的致密油储层裂缝建模研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(1): 63-72.
[14]	方潘, 侯勇俊, 龙小康. 考虑刚柔耦合的振动筛动力学研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 38(5): 165-172.
[15]	张烈辉1 *，张芮菡1，蒋和煦2，孔玲2，佘娟2. 低渗透复合油藏压力动态有限元理论分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 38(4): 1-8.