北美超低渗致密油藏提高采收率技术现状

doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2021.02.04.01

西南石油大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2021, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (5): 166-183.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2021.02.04.01

北美超低渗致密油藏提高采收率技术现状

付京¹, 姚博文¹, 雷征东², 田野^1,3, 吴玉树¹

1. 科罗拉多矿业大学, 科罗拉多高登 80401;
2. 中国石油勘探开发研究院, 北京海淀 100083;
3. 西南石油大学石油与天然气工程学院, 四川成都 610500

收稿日期:2021-02-04 发布日期:2021-11-05
通讯作者: 姚博文,E-mail:byao@mines.edu
作者简介:付京,1994年生,女,汉族,黑龙江大庆人,博士研究生,主要从事非常规油气藏研究。E-mail:jingfu@mines.edu
姚博文,1989年生,男,汉族,山东临沂人,博士研究生,主要从事岩石破碎力学、压裂力学机理等方面的研究工作。E-mail:byao@mines.edu
雷征东,1979年生,男,汉族,重庆垫江人,教授级高级工程师,博士,主要从事致密油藏开发方面的研究工作。E-mail:leizhengdong@peteochina.com.cn
田野,1991年生,男,汉族,陕西武功人,博士,主要从事油藏数值模拟、非常规油气藏开发方面的研究工作。E-mail:yetian@mines.edu
吴玉树,1954年生,男,汉族,黑龙江肇源人,教授,博士,主要从事油藏数值模拟、CO₂地质埋存、注CO₂提高采收率及非常规油气藏数值模拟等方面的研究工作。E-mail:ywu@mines.edu
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（51974356）

Enhanced Oil Recovery of Ultra-low Permeability Tight Reservoirs in North America

FU Jing¹, YAO Bowen¹, LEI Zhengdong², TIAN Ye^1,3, WU Yushu¹

1. Colorado School of Mines, Golden, Colorado 80401, USA;
2. PetroChina Research Institute of Petroleum Exploration and Development, Haidian, Beijing 100083, China;
3. Petroleum Engineering School, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China

Received:2021-02-04 Published:2021-11-05

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 在过去的十年中，北美致密油气的开发技术日渐成熟，其中，最具代表性的技术是水力压裂和水平钻井技术的结合。然而，现有依靠天然能量的衰竭式开发只能采出超低渗储层中的少部分原油（采出程度低于10%），导致致密储层中仍存在大量剩余油。因此，非常规超低渗油藏提高采收率技术的研究日趋重要。目前，全世界90%以上的致密油产量来自美国，其开采技术在非常规致密油的开发领域具有明显优势。并且，在过去的十年间，北美的石油公司已经对针对致密低渗油藏的提高采收率（EOR）技术进行了许多现场测试。鉴于美国在非常规致密油的勘探开发中具有领先地位，重点对北美致密油资源开发中提高采收率措施的现场经验进行了总结和评价，并指出了其目前面临的主要困难和挑战。此项研究对于中国未来超低渗致密油藏提高采收率技术的发展具有指导和借鉴意义。

关键词: 致密油, 超低渗油藏, 提高采收率, 现场试验, 综述

Abstract: There are many significant breakthroughs in unconventional oil and gas development in North America in the past decade, among which is the combination of such as hydraulic fracturing and horizontal drilling. However, only a small amount of oil from unconventional reservoirs can be recovered by primary recovery, which means a large amount of oil is remaining in tight reservoirs. Therefore, it is essential to develop the enhanced oil recovery technology in unconventional reservoirs. The United States produces more than 90 percent of the world's tight oil production, and has an overwhelming advantage in unconventional tight oil exploration and production. Operators in North America have conducted several field pilots on enhanced oil recovery (EOR) technology in tight oil reservoirs with ultra-low permeability. The summary and evaluation of these field pilots in North American unconventional reservoirs are discussed. The main difficulties and challenges of the EOR development in unconventional reservoirs are also pointed out.

Key words: tight oil reservoir, ultra low permeability reservoirs, enhanced oil recovery, field test, overview

中图分类号:

TE34

付京, 姚博文, 雷征东, 田野, 吴玉树. 北美超低渗致密油藏提高采收率技术现状[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(5): 166-183.

FU Jing, YAO Bowen, LEI Zhengdong, TIAN Ye, WU Yushu. Enhanced Oil Recovery of Ultra-low Permeability Tight Reservoirs in North America[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2021, 43(5): 166-183.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2021.02.04.01

http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/Y2021/V43/I5/166

参考文献

[1] SOEDER D J. The successful development of gas and oil resources from shales in North America[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2018, 163:399-420. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2017.12.084
[2] TODD H B, EVANS J G. Improved oil recovery IOR pilot projects in the Bakken Formation[C]. SPE 180270-MS, 2016. doi:10.2118/180270-MS
[3] CHAUDHARY A S, EHLIG-ECONOMIDES C A, WATTENBARGER R. Shale oil production performance from a stimulated reservoir volume[C]. SPE 147596-MS, 2011. doi:10.2118/147596-MS
[4] CASTRO-ALVAREZ F, MARSTERS P, DE LEÓN BARIDO D P, et al. Sustainability lessons from shale development in the United States for Mexico and other emerging unconventional oil and gas developers[J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2018, 82:1320-1332. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2017.08.082
[5] BABADAGLI T. Philosophy of EOR[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2020, 188:106930. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2020.106930
[6] RASSENFOSS S. Shale EOR works, but will it make a difference?[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 2017, 69(10):34-40. doi:10.2118/1017-0034-JPT
[7] WANG Lei, TIAN Ye, YU Xiangyu, et al. Advances in improved/enhanced oil recovery technologies for tight and shale reservoirs[J]. Fuel, 2017, 210:425-445. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2017.08.095
[8] KOVSCEK A R, TANG G Q, VEGA B. Experimental investigation of oil recovery from siliceous shale by CO₂ injection[C]. SPE 115679-MS, 2008. doi:10.2118/115679-MS
[9] VEGA B, O'BRIEN W J, KOVSCEK A R. Experimental investigation of oil recovery from siliceous shale by miscible CO₂ injection[C]. SPE 135627-MS, 2010. doi:10.2118/135627-MS
[10] HAWTHORNE S B, GORECKI C D, SORENSEN J A, et al. Hydrocarbon mobilization mechanisms from upper, middle, and lower Bakken reservoir rocks exposed to CO₂[C]. SPE 167200-MS, 2013. doi:10.2118/167200-MS
[11] TEKLU T W. Experimental and numerical study of carbon dioxide injection enhanced oil recovery in low-permeability reservoirs[D]. Colorado:Colorado School of Mines, 2015.
[12] WANG Zengxiang, MA Jinhua, GAO Ruimin, et al. Optimizing cyclic CO₂ injection for low-permeability oil reservoirs through experimental study[C]. SPE 167193-MS, 2013. doi:10.2118/167193-MS
[13] TOVAR F D, EIDE O, GRAUE A, et al. Experimental investigation of enhanced recovery in unconventional liquid reservoirs using CO₂:A look ahead to the future of unconventional EOR[C]. SPE 169022-MS, 2014. doi:10.2118/169022-MS
[14] ZHANG Ke. Experimental and numerical investigation of oil recovery from Bakken Formation by miscible CO₂ injection[C]. SPE 184486-STU, 2016. doi:10.2118/184486-STU
[15] JIN X J, PAVIA M, SAMUEl M, et al. Field pilots of unconventional shale EOR in the Permian basin[C]. URTeC:506, 2019. doi:10.15530/urtec-2019-506
[16] SONG Chengyao, YANG Daoyong. Experimental and numerical evaluation of CO₂ huff-n-puff processes in Bakken Formation[J]. Fuel, 2017, 190:145-162. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2016.11.041
[17] LI L, SHENG J J, SU Y, et al. Further investigation of effects of injection pressure and imbibition water on CO₂ huff-n-puff performance in liquid-rich shale reservoirs[J]. Energy Fuels, 2018, 32(5):5789-5798. doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.8b00536
[18] LI Lei, SU Yuliang, HAO Yongmao, et al. A comparative study of CO₂ and N₂ huff-n-puff EOR performance in shale oil production[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2019, 181:106174. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2019.06.038
[19] CHEN C, BALHOFF M T, MOHANTY K K. Effect of reservoir heterogeneity on primary recovery and CO₂ huff-n-puff recovery in shale-oil reservoirs[C]. SPE 164553-PA, 2014. doi:10.2118/164553-PA
[20] SANCHEZ-RIVERA D, MOHANTY K, BALHOFF M. Reservoir simulation and optimization of huff-and-puff operations in the Bakken Shale[J]. Fuel, 2015, 147:82-94. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2014.12.062
[21] YU W, ZHANG Y, VARAVEI A, et al. Compositional simulation of CO₂ huff-n-puff in eagle ford tight oil reservoirs with CO₂ molecular diffusion, nanopore confinement, and complex natural fractures[C]. SPE 190325-PA, 2019. doi:10.2118/190325-PA
[22] SUN Runxuan, YU Wei, XU Feng, et al. Compositional simulation of CO₂ huff-n-puff process in Middle Bakken tight oil reservoirs with hydraulic fractures[J]. Fuel, 2019, 236:1446-1457. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2018.09.113
[23] KERR E, Venepalli K K, PATEL K, et al. Use of reservoir simulation to forecast field EOR response:An Eagle Ford gas injection huff-n-puff application[C]. SPE 199722-MS, 2020. doi:10.2118/199722-MS
[24] Energy Information Administration. Oil and petroleum products explained oil imports and exports[EB/OL].[2020-09-24]. https://www.eia.gov/energyexplained/oil-and-petroleum-products/imports-and-exports.php.
[25] Energy Information Administration. Review of emerging resources:U.S. shale gas and shale oil plays[EB/OL].[2020-09-24]. https://www.eia.gov/analysis/studies/usshalegas/pdf/usshaleplays.pdf.
[26] Earthquake Engineering Research Centre. Bakken Formation[EB/OL].[2020-09-24]. https://www.undeerc.org/bakken/bakkenformation.aspx.
[27] PATEL H J. Geologic assessment of drilling, completion, and stimulation methods in selected gas shale plays worldwide[D]. Texas:Texas A & M University, 2014.
[28] Energy Information Administration. Bakken region drilling productivity report[EB/OL].[2020-09-24]. https://www.eia.gov/petroleum/drilling/pdf/dpr-full.pdf.
[29] HOFFMAN T, EVANS J. Unconventional enhanced oil recovery pilot projects in the Bakken Formation[C]. Montana:AAPG Rocky Mountain Section Annual Meeting, 2017.
[30] SORENSEN J, HAMLINg J. Enhanced oil recovery in tight oil:Lessons learned from pilot tests in the Bakken[C]. Calgary:Tight Oil Optimization Workshop, 2015.
[31] SORENSEN J A, PEKOT L J, TORRES J A, et al. Field test of CO₂ injection in a vertical middle Bakken well to evaluate the potential for enhanced oil recovery and CO₂ storage[C]. Houston:Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, 2018. doi:10.15530/urtec-2018-2902813
[32] KAZEMPOUR M, KIANI M, NGUYEN D, et al. Boosting oil recovery in unconventional resources utilizing wettability altering agents:Successful translation from laboratory to field[C]. SPE 190172-MS, 2018. doi:10.2118/190172-MS
[33] SCHMIDT M, SEKAR B K. Innovative unconventional² EOR-A light EOR:An unconventional tertiary recovery approach to an unconventional Bakken reservoir in Southeast Saskatchewan[C]. Moscow:21st World Petroleum Congress, 2014.
[34] WOOD T, MILNE B. Waterflood potential could unlock billions of barrels[R]. Dundee Securities Limited:Dundee Capital Markets, 2011.
[35] Energy Information Administration. Eagle Ford region drilling productivity report[EB/OL].[2020-09-24]. https://www.eia.gov/petroleum/drilling/pdf/dpr-full.pdf.
[36] HOFFMAN T. Huff-n-puff gas injection pilot projects in the Eagle Ford[C]. SPE 189816-MS, 2018. doi:10.2118/189816-MS
[37] CARLSEN M L, MYDLAND S, DAHOUK M M, et al. Compositional tracking of a huff-n-puff project in the Eagle Ford:A second take[C]. 8th Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, 2020. doi:10.15530/urtec-2020-2869
[38] JIA B, TSAU J S, BARATI R. A review of the current progress of CO₂ injection EOR and carbon storage in shale oil reservoirs[J]. Fuel, 2019, 236, 404-427. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2018.08.103
[39] ALFARGE D, WEI M, BAI B. IOR methods in unconventional reservoirs of North America:Comprehensive review[C]. SPE 185640-MS, 2017. doi:10.2118/185640-MS
[40] ALFARGE D, WEI M, BAI B. Factors affecting CO₂-EOR in shale-oil reservoirs:Numerical simulation study and pilot tests[J]. Energy & Fuels, 2017, 31(8):8462-8480. doi:10.1021/acs.energyfuels.7b01623

北美超低渗致密油藏提高采收率技术现状

Enhanced Oil Recovery of Ultra-low Permeability Tight Reservoirs in North America

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	曹仁义, 程林松, 杜旭林, 时俊杰, 杨晨旭. 致密油藏渗流规律及数学模型研究进展[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(5): 113-136.
[2]	李浩楠, 宋平, 朱亚婷, 谭龙, 张记刚. 玛湖致密砾岩注氮气驱机理及应用效果评价[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(5): 203-211.
[3]	李一波, 何天双, 胡志明, 李亚龙, 蒲万芬. 页岩油藏提高采收率技术及展望[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(3): 101-110.
[4]	何金钢, 袁琳. 聚驱后聚表剂“调驱堵压”调整技术研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(3): 165-174.
[5]	魏兵, 刘江, 张翔, 蒲万芬. 致密油藏提高采收率方法与理论研究进展[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(1): 91-102.
[6]	闵超, 代博仁, 张馨慧, 杜建平. 机器学习在油气行业中的应用进展综述[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(6): 1-15.
[7]	陈恭洋, 王鹏宇, 高阳, 张方, 印森林. 混积岩复杂岩性识别方法[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(2): 1-14.
[8]	周建, 宋延杰, 姜艳娇, 孙钦帅, 靖彦卿. 海洋天然气水合物测井评价研究进展[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(2): 85-93.
[9]	魏兵, 尚静, 蒲万芬, 卡杰特·瓦列里, 赵金洲. 超临界CO₂在致密油藏中的扩散前缘预测[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(2): 94-102.
[10]	张德平, 马锋, 吴雨乐, 董泽华. 用于CO₂注气驱的油井缓蚀剂加注工艺优化研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(2): 103-109.
[11]	魏兵, 宋涛, 赵金洲, 卡杰特·瓦列里, 蒲万芬. 溶解气回注提高致密油藏采收率效果及敏感性[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(5): 85-95.
[12]	李永太, 孔柏岭. 提高三元复合驱现场应用效果的技术途径[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(4): 113-119.
[13]	刘忠群. 泾河油田裂缝型致密油藏地质特征及开发对策[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(2): 23-32.
[14]	刘红岐, 李博, 王拥军, 田杰, 孙杨沙. 川中大安寨段致密油储层储集特征研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 40(6): 47-55.
[15]	王冲, 屈雪峰, 王永康, 陈代鑫, 赵国玺. 鄂尔多斯盆地致密油体积压裂水平井产量预测[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 40(4): 123-131.