水平井体积改造井距和簇间距优化研究

doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2021.03.04.01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究页岩油水平井最优井距和簇间距的工程问题，针对鄂尔多斯盆地长$_7$储层地质特征，采用地质–工程一体化工作流程，建立三维地质模型和地质力学模型，模拟不同簇间距条件下的复杂缝网扩展，依据全缝长频率分布优化井距。采用非结构化数值模型预测水平井的生产动态，确定产量最高的分段分簇方案。数值模拟分析表明，采用缝长累积频率分布中P90值对应的缝长作为水平井井距，有助于提高复杂缝网对储量的控制程度，簇间距缩小到3～5 m时建议水平井井距为200 m左右；簇间距从15 m缩小到3 m，支撑裂缝总表面积提高108$%$，同时体积改造程度提高142$%$；对于目标储层，簇间距从15 m缩小到3 m，投产3 a累产油量增加75.91$%$；采用3 m簇间距方案无法满足经济效益的需求，建议以5 m作为簇间距。

关键词: 体积改造, 长$_7$储层, 井距, 簇间距, 页岩油

Abstract: Aiming at well spacing and cluster spacing optimization for horizontal wells, Chang 7 Formation in Ordos Basin is studied. Based on the integrated workflow through geology to engineering, 3D geological model and geomechanical model are built firstly with its geologic characteristics. Multi-stage fracturing design is simulated with various cluster spacing, and well spacing could be optimized by frequency distribution of full fracture length. Unstructured grid is used to predict the performance of a horizontal well and the best cluster spacing case is confirmed. Results from analysis of numerical simulation show that: it is recommended to optimize well spacing according to the cumulative frequency distribution of fracture length, like P90. It would be helpful to improve the controlling degree of complex fracture network on reserves. With cluster spacing ranging from 3 m to 5 m, it$'$s recommended to decrease lateral spacing to about 200 m; with tighter cluster spacing of 3 m instead of 15 m, the surface area of propped fractures could increase by 108$\%$, and volume stimulation degree increase by 142$\%$ for the target formation; with tighter cluster spacing of 3 m instead of 15 m, cumulative oil production increase by 75.91$\%$ in 3 years; rate of return on investment can$'$t be realized by cluster spacing of 3 m, and the recommended plan would be 5 m.

Key words: volume fracturing, Chang 7 Formation, well spacing, cluster spacing, shale oil

中图分类号:

TE349

马泽元, 胥云, 翁定为, 郭英, 鄢雪梅. 水平井体积改造井距和簇间距优化研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 46(2): 114-124.

MA Zeyuan, XU Yun, WENG Dingwei, GUO Ying, YAN Xuemei. Well Spacing and Cluster Spacing Optimization for Horizontal Well Volume Stimulation[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2024, 46(2): 114-124.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2021.03.04.01

http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/Y2024/V46/I2/114

参考文献

[1] WU Qi, XU Yun, WANG Xiaoquan, et al. Volume stimulation technology of unconventional reservoirs: Connotation, optimization design and implementation[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(3): 352-358. 吴奇, 胥云, 王晓泉, 等. 非常规油气藏体积改造技术——内涵、优化设计与实现[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(3): 352-358.
[2] WU Qi, XU Yun, ZHANG Shouliang, et al. The core theories and key optimization designs of volume stimulation technology for unconventional reservoirs[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2014, 35(4): 706-714. doi: 10.7623/syxb201404011 吴奇, 胥云, 张守良, 等. 非常规油气藏体积改造技术核心理论与优化设计关键[J]. 石油学报, 2014, 35(4): 706-714. doi: 10.7623/syxb201404011
[3] WU Qi, XU Yun, LIU Yuzhang, et al. The current situation of stimulated reservoir volume for shale in U. S. and its inspiration to China[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2011, 33(2): 1-7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7393.2011.02.001 吴奇, 胥云, 刘玉章, 等. 美国页岩气体积改造技术现状及对我国的启示[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2011, 33(2): 1-7. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-7393.2011.02.001
[4] WU Qi, XU Yun, WANG Tengfei, et al. The resolution of reservoir stimulation: An introduction of volume stimulation[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2011, 31(4): 7-12, 16. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2011.04.002 吴奇, 胥云, 王腾飞, 等. 增产改造理念的重大变革——体积改造技术概论[J]. 天然气工业, 2011, 31(4): 7-12, 16. doi: 10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2011.04.002
[5] HUANG Zhuo. Research on stress interference and propagation law of multi-fracture for "factory" fracturing[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2022, 29(4): 572-576. doi: 10.6056/dkyqt202204023 黄卓. "工厂化"压裂多裂缝应力干扰与延伸规律研究[J]. 断块油气田, 2022, 29(4): 572-576. doi: 10.6056/dkyqt202204023
[6] XU Yun, LEI Qun, CHEN Ming, et al. Progress and development of volume stimulation techniques[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(5): 874-887. doi: 10.11698/PED.2018.05.14 胥云, 雷群, 陈铭, 等. 体积改造技术理论研究进展与发展方向[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(5): 874-887. doi: 10.11698/PED.2018.05.14
[7] AL-RBEAWI S. An approach for the performance-impact of parent-child wellbores spacing and hydraulic fractures cluster spacing in conventional and unconventional reservoirs-sciencedirect[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2019, 185: 106570. doi: 10.1016/j.petrol.2019.106570
[8] GAKHAR K, SHAN D, RODIONOV Y, et al. Engineered approach for multi-well pad development in Eagle Ford shale[C]. San Antonio: the 4th Unconventional Resources Technology Conference, 2016. doi: 10.15530/urtec-2016-2431182
[9] XIONG Hongjie, LIU Songxia, FENG Feng, et al. Optimize completion design and well spacing with the latest complex fracture modeling & reservoir simulation technologies—A permian basin case study with seven wells[C]. SPE 194367-MS, 2019. doi: 10.2118/194367-MS
[10] XIONG Hongjie, WU Weiwei, GAO Sunhua. Optimizing well completion design and well spacing with integration of advanced multi-stage fracture modeling & reservoir simulation—A permian basin case study[C]. SPE 189855-MS, 2018. doi: 10.2118/189855-MS
[11] JONES M. Model-based cluster spacing optimization increase recovery and profitability in Eagle Ford[C]. SPE 194036-STU, 2018. doi: 10.2118/194036-STU
[12] FOWLER G, MCCLURE M, CIPOLLA C. A Utica case study: The impact of permeability estimates on history matching, fracture length, and well spacing[C]. SPE 195980-MS, 2019. doi: 10.2118/195980-MS
[13] LI Guoxin, LEI Zhengdong, DONG Weihong, et al. Progress, challenges and prospects of unconventional oil and gas development of CNPC[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2022, 27(1): 1-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2022.01.001 李国欣, 雷征东, 董伟宏, 等. 中国石油非常规油气开发进展、挑战与展望[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2022, 27(1): 1-11. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2022.01.001
[14] HE Yonghong, XUE Ting, LI Zhen, et al. Development technologies for Triassic Chang 7 shale oil in Ordos Basin: A case study of Qingcheng Oilfield, NW China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2023, 50(6): 1245-1258. doi: 10.11698/PED.20230248 何永宏, 薛婷, 李桢, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地长7页岩油开发技术实践: 以庆城油田为例[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2023, 50(6): 1245-1258. doi: 10.11698/PED.20230248
[15] ZHANG Kuangsheng, XUE Xiaojia, TAO Liang, et al. New method for evaluating the volume fracturing fracture network sweep volume in shale oil horizontal wells and its application[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2023, 30(5): 127-134. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2023.05.017 张矿生, 薛小佳, 陶亮, 等. 页岩油水平井体积压裂缝网波及体积评价新方法及应用[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(5): 127-134. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2023.05.017
[16] WANG Hao, TANG Wen, ZHANG Pengpeng, et al. Study on parameter optimization of fractured horizontal wells in shale gas reservoir considering net present value[J]. Fault-Block Oil and Gas Field, 2023, 30(2): 205-212. doi: 10.6056/dkyqt202302004 王昊, 唐雯, 张鹏鹏, 等. 考虑净现值的页岩气藏压裂水平井参数优化研究[J]. 断块油气田, 2023, 30(2): 205-212. doi: 10.6056/dkyqt202302004
[17] LEI Qun, YANG Lifeng, DUAN Yaoyao, et al. The "fracture-controlled reserves" based stimulation technology for unconventional oil and gas reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2018, 45(4): 719-726. doi: 10.11698/PED.2018.04.18 雷群, 杨立峰, 段瑶瑶, 等. 非常规油气"缝控储量"改造优化设计技术[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2018, 45(4): 719-726. doi: 10.11698/PED.2018.04.18
[18] LEI Qun, GUAN Baoshan, CAI Bo, et al. Technological progress and prospects of reservoir stimulation[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2019, 46(3): 580-587. doi: 10.11698/PED.2019.03.16 雷群, 管保山, 才博, 等. 储集层改造技术进展及发展方向[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2019, 46(3): 580-587. doi: 10.11698/PED.2019.03.16
[19] ZHONG Hongli, ZHUO Zimin, ZHANG Fengqi, et al. Heterogeneity of Chang 7 shale oil reservoir and its oil control law in Ganquan Area, Ordos Basin[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2023, 30(4): 10-18. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2023.04.002 钟红利, 卓自敏, 张凤奇, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地甘泉地区长7页岩油储层非均质性及其控油规律[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(4): 10-18. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2023.04.002
[20] ZHOU Zhongya. Mechanism of fracture extension and process countermeasures in grain-type shale oil reservoirs[J]. Special Oil & Gas Reservoirs, 2023, 30(6): 141-149. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2023.06.019 周忠亚. 纹层型页岩油储层裂缝扩展机理及工艺对策[J]. 特种油气藏, 2023, 30(6): 141-149. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1006-6535.2023.06.019
[21] WANG Chen, GAO Hui, FEI Erzhan, et al. Imbibition of fracturing fluid and microscopic oil production characteristics in Chang 7 shale reservoir in Ordos Basin[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2023, 47(6): 95-103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5005.2023.06.011 王琛, 高辉, 费二战, 等. 鄂尔多斯盆地长7页岩储层压裂液渗吸规律及原油微观动用特征[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 47(6): 95-103. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5005.2023.06.011
[22] LI Yang, ZHAO Qingmin, LÜ Qi, et al. Evaluation technology and practice of continental shale oil development in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2022, 49(5): 955-964. doi: 10.11698/PED.20220177 李阳, 赵清民, 吕琦, 等. 中国陆相页岩油开发评价技术与实践[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2022, 49(5): 955-964. doi: 10.11698/PED.20220177
[23] LEE W J. Well testing, SPE textbook series[M]. Richardson: Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1982. %TX
[24] XIONG Jian, WU Jun, LIU Xiangjun, et al. The geomechanical characteristics of the continental shale reservoirs and their influence on the fracturing effect[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2023, 45(5): 69-80. doi: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2021.12.28.01 熊健, 吴俊, 刘向君, 等. 陆相页岩储层地质力学特性及对压裂效果的影响[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 45(5): 69-80. doi: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2021.12.28.01
[25] YUAN Shiyi, LEI Zhengdong, LI Junshi, et al. Progress in technology for the development of continental shale oil and thoughts on the development of scale benefits and strategies[J]. Journal of China University of Petroleum (Edition of Natural Science), 2023, 47(5): 13-24. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5005.2023.05.002 袁士义, 雷征东, 李军诗, 等. 陆相页岩油开发技术进展及规模效益开发对策思考[J]. 中国石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 47(5): 13-24. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-5005.2023.05.002
[26] LI Gao, ZHANG Yi, YANG Xu. Engineering geological mechanics issues and research methods in oil and gas exploration and development[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2023, 45(3): 72-80. doi: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2023.02.26.01 李皋, 张毅, 杨旭. 油气勘探开发中的工程地质力学问题及研究方法[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 45(3): 72-80. doi: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2023.02.26.01
[27] OSORIO J G, CHEN H Y, TEUFEL L W. Numerical simulation of the impact of flow-induced geomechanical response on the productivity of stress-sensitive reservoirs[C]. SPE 51929-MS, 1999. doi: 10.2118/51929-MS
[28] WENG X, KRESSE O, COHEN C, et al. Modeling of hydraulic-fracture-network propagation in a naturally fractured formation[C]. SPE 140253-PA, 2011. doi: 10.2118/140253-PA
[29] KRESSE O, WENG X, GU H, et al. Numerical modeling of hydraulic fractures interaction in complex naturally fractured formations[C]. Chicago: the 46th U.S. Rock Mechanics/Geomechanics Symposium, 2012.
[30] WANG Erjun, MA Lei, CAO Feng, et al. Research on optimization and application of fracturing perforation orientation in directional wells based on minimum initiation pressure[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2023, 45(1): 117-126. doi: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2021.01.28.02 王尔钧, 马磊, 曹峰, 等. 定向井压裂射孔方位优化及应用研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 45(1): 117-126. doi: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2021.01.28.02
[31] WATTENBARGER R A, EL-BANBI A H, VILLEGAS M E, et al. Production analysis of linear flow into fractured tight gas wells[C]. SPE 39931-MS, 1998. doi: 10.2118/39931-MS
[32] CHEN Ming, ZHANG Shicheng, XU Yun, et al. A numerical method for simulating planar 3D multi-fracture propagation in multi-stage fracturing of horizontal wells[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2020, 47(1): 163-174. doi: 10.11698/PED.2020.01.16 陈铭, 张士诚, 胥云, 等. 水平井分段压裂平面三维多裂缝扩展模型求解算法[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2020, 47(1): 163-174. doi: 10.11698/PED.2020.01.16
[33] XIONG Hongjie. The effective cluster spacing plays the vital role in unconventional reservoir development-permian basin case studies[C]. SPE 199721-MS, 2020. doi: 10.2118/199721-MS