克拉玛依油田中三叠统克下组油气产能评价

doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2022.02.16.01

西南石油大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2024, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (2): 41-52.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2022.02.16.01

克拉玛依油田中三叠统克下组油气产能评价

石勇¹, 方志斌¹, 卢炳雄², 徐欣¹, 于景维³

1. 中国石油新疆油田第二采油厂, 新疆克拉玛依 834000;
2. 南宁师范大学地理科学与规划学院, 广西南宁 530001;
3. 中国石油大学(北京)克拉玛依校区, 新疆克拉玛依 834000

收稿日期:2022-02-16 发布日期:2024-05-11
通讯作者: 于景维,E-mail:yyjjww-1985@163.com
作者简介:石勇,1970年生,男,汉族,山东泰安人,高级工程师,硕士,主要从事油气地质勘探开发等方面的研究工作。E-mail:shiyong@petrochina.com.cn;方志斌,1970年生,男,汉族,湖北黄冈人,高级工程师,硕士,主要从事油气地质勘探方面的研究工作。E-mail:547343700@qq.com;卢炳雄,1987年生,男,瑶族,广西河池人,副教授,博士,主要从事非常规油气地质勘探方面的研究。E-mail:lubingxiong@nnnu.edu.cn;徐欣,1970年生,男,汉族,新疆克拉玛依人,工程师,主要从事油气地质开发方面的研究。E-mail:xxin@petrochina.com.cn;于景维,1985年生,男,汉族,河北石家庄人,副教授,博士,主要从事储层沉积学、层序地层学相关的教学和研究工作。E-mail:yyjjww-1985@163.com
基金资助:
国家科技重大专项(2011ZX05001-005-01)；广西自然科学基金(2018JJB150094)；新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金(2021D01A201)

Productivity Evaluation of Lower Karamay Formation of the Middle Triassic in Karamay Oilfield

SHI Yong¹, FANG Zhibin¹, LU Bingxiong², XU Xin¹, YU Jingwei³

1. The Second Oil Production Plant, CNPC, Karamay, Xinjiang 834000, China;
2. School of Geography & Planning, Nanning Normal University, Nanning, Guangxi 530001, China;
3. Karamay Campus of China University of Petroleum, Karamay, Xinjiang 834000, China

Received:2022-02-16 Published:2024-05-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 新疆克拉玛依油田530井区下克拉玛依组具有较大油气勘探开发潜力，但单井产能差异较大，阻碍该区目的层进一步的勘探开发。以多油层产出的S2砂层组为研究对象，利用钻井岩芯观察、测井、粒度、薄片、高压压汞、物性以及敏感性等多种宏观及微观分析资料，对沉积储层特征进行详细分析，将影响重点砂层产能的地质参数和工程参数同储层物性进行灰色关联分析，对未动用区油层产能进行评价。结果表明，研究区下克拉玛依组S2砂层组中有利油层微相为分支河道微相，针对S2–4和S2–5沉积微相中分支河道的展布可进行针对性地扩边。S2砂层组油层岩石类型以砾岩类为主，储集空间主要为次生孔隙和微裂缝，孔隙结构非均质性较强，储层物性相关性较好，同时粒径同含油性为正相关。未动用区S2–4和S2–5油层产能受工程参数影响大于地质参数，S2–4和S2–5油层开发前景较好。

关键词: S2砂层组, 克下组, 沉积特征, 储层特征, 产能评价

Abstract: There has a great oil and gas exploration potential in Lower Karamay Formation of 530 Well Block. However, the large differences of productivity between single wells have hindered further exploration and development work. Sedimentary and reservoir characters are searched based on combination of macro and micro data, such as observation of cores, logging, grain size, thin section, high pressure mercury injection, physical property and sentimental experiment, and make evaluation on productivity is made non-producing area with geology and engineer parameters by grey relation way. The results show that favorable reservoir micro-face is distributary channel, and development area of S2–4 and S2–5 can be enlarged by distribution trend of distributary channel. Main reservoir rock in S2 sand group is gravel, and the reserve space comprises of secondary pores and micro-faults which make pore structure complex, and the relationship between pore and permeability, grain size and oiliness is good. Engineer parameters have deeper affection on S2–4 and S2–5 reservoir productivity than geology parameters, and development potential of S2–4 and S2–5 reservoir is large.

Key words: S2 sand group, Lower Karamay Formation, sedimentary character, reservoir character, productivity evaluation

中图分类号:

TE348

石勇, 方志斌, 卢炳雄, 徐欣, 于景维. 克拉玛依油田中三叠统克下组油气产能评价[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2024, 46(2): 41-52.

SHI Yong, FANG Zhibin, LU Bingxiong, XU Xin, YU Jingwei. Productivity Evaluation of Lower Karamay Formation of the Middle Triassic in Karamay Oilfield[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University(Science & Technology Edition), 2024, 46(2): 41-52.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2022.02.16.01

http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/Y2024/V46/I2/41

参考文献

[1] WEIMER P. Sequence stratigraphy, facies geometries and depositional history of the Mississipi Fan, Gulf of Mexico[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 1990, 74(4): 425-453. doi: 10.1306/0C9B2321-1710-11D7-8645000102C1865D
[2] LIU Keyu, CROOK K A W, CLARKE J H, et al. Submarine features of modern open-sea fan deltas, Huon peninsula, Papua New Gwined[J]. Sedimentary Geology, 1995, 98(1-4): 63-77. doi: 10.1016/0037-0738(95)00027-6
[3] MENG Qi'an, WU Haibo, LI Junhui, et al. Type classification of the slope area in the continental faulted lake basin and the hydrocarbon enrichment characteristics: Taking Wuerxun-Beier Sag in Hailar Basin as an example[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2019, 38(5): 59-68. doi: 10.19597/J.ISSN.1000-3754.201907006 蒙启安, 吴海波, 李军辉, 等. 陆相断陷湖盆斜坡区类型划分及油气富集规律——以海拉尔盆地乌尔逊—贝尔凹陷为例[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2019, 38(5): 59-68. doi: 10.19597/J.ISSN.1000-3754.201907006
[4] JIANG Qingping, KONG Chuixian, LI Weifeng, et al. Sedimentary characteristics and evolution law of a lacustrine large-scale fan delta: A case study from the Triassic Baikouquan Formation on the west slope of Mahu Sag[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 2020, 38(5): 923-932. doi: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2019.089 蒋庆平, 孔垂显, 李维锋, 等. 陆相湖盆大型扇三角洲沉积特征与演化规律——以准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷西斜坡区三叠系百口泉组为例[J]. 沉积学报, 2020, 38(5): 923-932. doi: 10.14027/j.issn.1000-0550.2019.089
[5] GAO Yang, YU Xinghe, ZENG Daqian, et al. Differences in sedimentary records of different coarse-grained deltas and their genesis in the Triassic Upper Karamay Formation, Hongshanzui Area, Junggar Basin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2018, 20(6): 973-988. doi: 10.7605/gdlxb.2018.06.071 高阳, 于兴河, 曾大乾, 等. 准噶尔盆地红山嘴地区三叠系克上组两类粗粒三角洲的沉积记录差异及其成因[J]. 古地理学报, 2018, 20(6): 973-988. doi: 10.7605/gdlxb.2018.06.071
[6] WAN Lin, WANG Qingbin, ZHAO Guoxiang, et al. Quantitative characterization and main controlling factors of micropore structure in diffenert size sandstone of fan delta reservoirs: A case study of Ed₃ in Shijiutuo Uplift steep slope zone[J]. Geological Science and Technology Information, 2018, 37(5): 90-99. 万琳, 王清斌, 赵国祥, 等. 扇三角洲不同粒级砂岩储层微观孔隙结构定量表征——以石臼坨凸起陡坡带东三段为例[J]. 地质科技情报, 2018, 37(5): 90-99.
[7] YANG Wenjie, HU Mingyi, DENG Qingjie, et al. Characteristics of the sedimentary filling and evolution in the initial chasmic stage of the small rift lake basin: A case of Huo Member-2 in Sujiatun Area of Lishu Fault Depression of Songliao Basin[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2019, 38(6): 12-21. doi: 10.19597/J.ISSN.1000-3754.201901047 杨文杰, 胡明毅, 邓庆杰, 等. 小型断陷湖盆初始裂陷期沉积充填演化特征——以松辽盆地梨树断陷苏家屯地区火二段为例[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2019, 38(6): 12-21. doi: 10.19597/J.ISSN.1000-3754.201901047
[8] XU Yanhong, YANG Xianghua, MEI Lianfu. Reservoir characteristics and main control factors of conglomerate reservoir of El₃ in the northwest steep slope zone of Weixinan Depression[J]. Earth Science, 2020, 45(5): 1706-1721. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2019.174 徐燕红, 杨香华, 梅廉夫. 涠西南凹陷西北陡坡带流三段砂砾岩储层特征与主控因素[J]. 地球科学, 2020, 45(5): 1706-1721. doi: 10.3799/dqkx.2019.174
[9] HOU Gangfu, WU Aicheng, ZOU Zhiwen, et al. Depositional characteristics and models of braided river delta in Badaowan Formation of Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2017, 38(6): 678-685. doi: 10.7657/XJPG20170608 厚刚福, 吴爱成, 邹志文, 等. 玛湖凹陷八道湾组辫状河三角洲沉积特征及模式[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2017, 38(6): 678-685. doi: 10.7657/XJPG20170608
[10] JIN Jun, KANG Xun, HU Wenxuan, et al. Diagenesis and its influence on coarse clastic reservoirs in the Baikouquan Formation of western slope of the Mahu Depression, Junggar Basin[J]. Petroleum and Natural Gas Geology, 2017, 38(2): 323-333, 406. doi: 10.11743/ogg20170212 靳军, 康逊, 胡文瑄, 等. 准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷西斜坡百口泉组砂砾岩储层成岩作用及对储集性能的影响[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(2): 323-333, 406. doi: 10.11743/ogg20170212
[11] LUO Xingping, PANG Xu, SU Dongxu, et al. Recognition of complicated sandy conglomerate reservoir based on micro resistivity imaging logging: A case study of Baikouquan Formation in western slope of Mahu Sag, Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2018, 39(3): 345-351. doi: 10.7657/XJPG20180313 罗兴平, 庞旭, 苏东旭, 等. 电成像测井在复杂砂砾岩储集层岩性识别中的应用——以准噶尔盆地玛湖凹陷西斜坡百口泉组为例[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2018, 39(3): 345-351. doi: 10.7657/XJPG20180313
[12] ZHU Ning, CAO Yingchang, XI Kelai, et al. Diagenesis and physical properties evolution of sandy conglomerate reservoirs: A case study of Triassic Baikouquan Formation in northern slope zone of Mahu Depression[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology, 2019, 48(5): 1102-1118. doi: 10.13247/j.cnki.jcumt.001019 朱宁, 操应长, 葸克来, 等. 砂砾岩储层成岩作用与物性演化——以玛湖凹陷北斜坡区三叠系百口泉组为例[J]. 中国矿业大学学报, 2019, 48(5): 1102-1118. doi: 10.13247/j.cnki.jcumt.001019
[13] CUI Yufeng. Study on well logging evaluation methods for low permeability reservoir on Lower Karamay Formation in 530 Well Block of 8th Zone[D]. Qingdao: China University of Petroleum (East China), 2013. 崔玉峰. 八区530井区克下组低渗透储层测井评价方法研究[D]. 青岛: 中国石油大学(华东), 2013.
[14] WANG Hui, LI Ting, GAO Bei, et al. Low resitivity reservoir evaluation and identification method research in 530 Well Area of Karamay Oilfield[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum and Natural Gas, 2013, 9(4): 49-52. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-2677.2013.04.012 王辉, 李婷, 高蓓, 等. 克拉玛依油田八区530井区低电阻率油层识别及评价方法[J]. 新疆石油天然气, 2013, 9(4): 49-52. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-2677.2013.04.012
[15] CHEN Yicai, KANG Zhihong, SEHN Zhongmin, et al. Reservoir's physical property and oil-water distribution control factors of Lower Urh Formation in Well 530 district of Karamay Oilfield[J]. Xinjiang Geology, 2002, 20(3): 243-246. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8845.2002.03.014 陈义才, 康志宏, 沈忠民, 等. 克拉玛依油田530井区下乌尔禾组储层物性及油水分布控制因素[J]. 新疆地质, 2002, 20(3): 243-246. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-8845.2002.03.014
[16] PANG Wen, HOU Mingcai, CHEN Yicai, et al. Alluvial fan and oil-water distribution characteristics of Xiawuerhe Formation in Well 530 Field of Karamay Oilfield, Xinjiang, China[J]. Journal of Chengdu University of Technology (Science & Technology Edition), 2004, 31(5): 505-510. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9727.2004.05.011 庞雯, 侯明才, 陈义才, 等. 克拉玛依油田530井区下乌尔禾组冲积扇与油水分布特征[J]. 成都理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2004, 31(5): 505-510. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1671-9727.2004.05.011
[17] ZHU Xiaomin. Sedimentary petrology[M]. Beijing: Petroleum Industry Press, 2008. 朱筱敏. 沉积岩石学[M]. 北京: 石油工业出版社, 2008.
[18] YU Jingwei, LIU Ni, PANG Taizhong, et al. Sedimentary reservoir characteristics of the member of the Qigu Formation in the Fudong slope zone of the Junggar Basin[J]. Journal of Stratigraphy, 2017, 41(2): 221-228. 于景维, 柳妮, 庞太忠, 等. 准噶尔盆地阜东斜坡阜东16井区齐古组一段沉积储集层特征[J]. 地层学杂志, 2017, 41(2): 221-228.
[19] YU Jingwei, LIU Ni, WANG Man, et al. Study on macroscopic heterogeneity of the first member reservoir of Qigu Formation in Fudong Slope Area and its controlling factors[J]. Journal of Xi'an Shiyou University (Natural Science Edition), 2017, 32(2): 10-19. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-064X.2017.02.002 于景维, 柳妮, 王满, 等. 阜东斜坡区齐古组一段储集层宏观非均质性及其控制因素研究[J]. 西安石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 32(2): 10-19. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-064X.2017.02.002
[20] YU Jingwei, YE Yong, LIU Ni, et al. Character differences and controlling factors of reservoirs in the Upper-middle Jurassic Fudong Slope Area, Junggar Basin[J]. Acta Geologica Sinica, 2018, 92(5): 1070-1080. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2018.05.012 于景维, 叶勇, 柳妮, 等. 准噶尔盆地阜东斜坡区中上侏罗统储集层特征差异及控制因素分析[J]. 地质学报, 2018, 92(5): 1070-1080. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.0001-5717.2018.05.012
[21] YU Jingwei, WEI Fen, WEN Huaguo, et al. Analysis on distribution of illite/montmorillonite mixed layer and its controlling factors in the Toutunhe Formation in Fudong slope area of Junggar Basin[J]. Henan Journal of University of Science and Technology (Natural Science Edition), 2019, 38(6): 39-46. doi: 10.16186/j.cnki.1673-9787.2019.6.6 于景维, 魏芬, 文华国, 等. 准噶尔盆地阜东斜坡带头屯河组伊/蒙混层分布规律及其主控因素研究[J]. 河南理工大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 38(6): 39-46. doi: 10.16186/j.cnki.1673-9787.2019.6.6
[22] YU Jingwei, LI Lulu, QI Liqi, et al. Reservoir controlling factors of Toutunhe No. 2 Member in Fudong Slope Zone in eastern Junggar Basin[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2014, 35(1): 34-38. 于景维, 李璐璐, 祁利祺, 等. 阜东斜坡带头屯河组二段储集层控制因素[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2014, 35(1): 34-38.
[23] PAN Zhihong, PANG Xiongqi, GUO Kunzhang, et al. Quantitative simulation of porosity evolution in the third Member of Shahejie Formation in Puwei Area in Dongpu Depression[J]. China Petroleum Exploration, 2018, 23(1): 91-99. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2018.01.010 潘志鸿, 庞雄奇, 郭坤章, 等. 东濮凹陷濮卫地区沙三段储层孔隙定量演化[J]. 中国石油勘探, 2018, 23(1): 91-99. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-7703.2018.01.010
[24] TIAN Han, LI Ming, YANG Min, et al. Study on porosity exponent of fractured-vuggy reservoirs-based on triple porosity model before and after improvement[J]. Progress in Geophysics, 2015, 30(4): 1779-1784. doi: 10.6038/pg20150434 田瀚, 李明, 杨敏, 等. 缝洞型储层孔隙度指数的计算研究——基于改进前后的三孔隙度模型[J]. 地球物理学进展, 2015, 30(4): 1779-1784. doi: 10.6038/pg20150434
[25] LIU Ni, WU Congwen, YAN Shibang, et al. Analysis on characters and affecting factors of productivity in Toutunhe Formation in Fudong slope zone[J]. Journal of Xinjiang University (Natural Science Edition), 2016, 33(1): 109-114. doi: 10.13568/j.cnki.651094.2016.01.018 柳妮, 吴丛文, 严世帮, 等. 阜东斜坡区头屯河组产能特征及其影响因素分析[J]. 新疆大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 33(1): 109-114. doi: 10.13568/j.cnki.651094.2016.01.018
[26] ZHU Zhaoqun, LIN Chengyan, ZHANG Sujie, et al. Application of improved fuzzy-grey comprehensive evaluation method to quantitative reservoir evaluation: A case of study of the low-permeability gas reservoirs of the lower part of 8th Member of the Shihezi Formation in Su X Block of Sulige Gas Field[J]. Oil & Gas Geology, 2017, 38(1): 197-208. doi: 10.11743/ogg20170121 朱兆群, 林承焰, 张苏杰, 等. 改进的模糊-灰色综合评判方法在储层定量评价中的应用——以苏里格气田苏X井区盒8下亚段低渗透气藏为例[J]. 石油与天然气地质, 2017, 38(1): 197-208. doi: 10.11743/ogg20170121
[27] TU Yi, XIE Chuanli, LIU Chao, et al. Application of the grey correlation analysis method in reservoir evaluation of Qingdong Sag[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2012, 23(2): 381-386. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8141.2016.04.011 涂乙, 谢传礼, 刘超, 等. 灰色关联分析法在青东凹陷储层评价中的应用[J]. 天然气地球科学, 2012, 23(2): 381-386. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1005-8141.2016.04.011
[28] ZHAO Jiafan, CHEN Xiaohong, ZHANG Qin. Application of grey association analysis in reservoir evaluation[J]. Progress in Exploration Geophysics, 2003, 26(4): 282-286. 赵加凡, 陈小宏, 张勤. 灰关联分析在储层评价中的应用[J]. 勘探地球物理进展, 2003, 26(4): 282-286.
[29] YANG Deyong, LI Chao. Clustering analysis on bulk samples for the reservoir evaluation[J]. Petroleum Geology and Experiment, 1991, 13(3): 281-286. 杨德永, 李超. 储层评价中的大样本聚类方法[J]. 石油实验地质, 1991, 13(3): 281-286.
[30] ZHANG Qin, ZHU Xiaomin, ZHONG Dakang, et al. Application of major element quantification method in reservoir assessment: Taking the Paleogene clastic reservoirs in Dongying Sag as examples[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2006, 26(10): 21-23, 170. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0976.2006.10.007 张琴, 朱筱敏, 钟大康, 等. 储层"主因素定量"评价方法的应用——以东营凹陷下第三系碎屑岩为例[J]. 天然气工业, 2006, 26(10): 21-23, 170. doi: 10.3321/j.issn:1000-0976.2006.10.007

克拉玛依油田中三叠统克下组油气产能评价

Productivity Evaluation of Lower Karamay Formation of the Middle Triassic in Karamay Oilfield

RichHTML

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	徐刚, 陈永东, 陈成, 胡林, 刘子畅. 黄骅拗陷歧南次凹沙三段储层特征及主控因素[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 45(6): 31-42.
[2]	马聪, 周军军, 胡亮, 齐婧, 吴海光. 盆1井西凹陷三工河组储层特征与形成机理[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 45(5): 1-13.
[3]	曾德铭, 谢晓斌, 黄董, 余良志, 张宇. 四川盆地北部二叠系茅口组沉积特征及油气意义[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2023, 45(1): 1-12.
[4]	杨莎莎, 黄旭日, 贾继生, 武志学, 李伟华. 黄陵地区延长组长₆段深水砂岩储层特征分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2022, 44(1): 53-65.
[5]	余浩杰, 钟寿康, 李浮萍, 薛雯, 田清华. 苏里格气田马家沟组膏模孔型储层特征及成因[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(3): 71-80.
[6]	程乐利, 白林坤, 韦少校, 熊亭, 印森林. 北羌塘拗陷巴贡组致密砂岩储层特征及控制因素[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(2): 10-22.
[7]	谢日彬, 李海涛, 杨勇, 刘远志, 曲长伟. 珠江口盆地礁灰岩储层特征精细表征[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(2): 23-35.
[8]	侯明才, 陈扬, 王粤川, 高坤顺. 渤中22-1构造碳酸盐岩储层岩溶识别及影响因素[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(1): 17-29.
[9]	钱海涛, 张翔, 卞保力, 刘海磊, 张孟刚. 玛南斜坡下乌尔禾组砾岩储层特征及主控因素[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2021, 43(1): 41-50.
[10]	彭先, 彭军, 张连进, 林攀, 兰雪梅. 双鱼石构造栖霞组白云岩储层特征及主控因素[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(5): 1-12.
[11]	魏华动, 石桂鹏, 朱秀香, 张云峰, 王振宇. 塔中西部良里塔格组台缘台内礁滩储层差异性[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(5): 25-38.
[12]	王伟东, 彭军, 夏青松, 段冠一, 孙恩慧. 川北大安寨生屑灰岩储层主控因素及预测思路[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(4): 13-21.
[13]	吴群, 杨云飞, 王树芳. 南阳凹陷黑龙庙地区近岸水下扇沉积特征研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(1): 33-44.
[14]	王国亭, 孙建伟, 黄锦袖, 韩江晨, 朱玉杰. 神木气田低渗致密储层特征与水平井开发评价[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(5): 1-9.
[15]	夏志远, 李森明, 庞皓, 李文研. 咸化湖盆过渡相组沉积控储作用浅析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(4): 12-22.