太行山中南段长城系赵家庄组沉积特征

doi:10.11885/j.issn.16745086.2016.03.22.04

西南石油大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2017, Vol. 39 ›› Issue (4): 47-56.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.16745086.2016.03.22.04

太行山中南段长城系赵家庄组沉积特征

王青春, 贺萍, 杜江民, 刘荣访, 李伟

河北地质大学资源学院, 河北石家庄 050031

收稿日期:2016-03-22 修回日期:2017-03-02 出版日期:2017-08-01 发布日期:2017-08-01
通讯作者: 王青春,E-mail:wangqingchun@sina.com
作者简介:王青春,1977年生,男,汉族,河北徐水人,副教授,博士,主要从事储层沉积学及沉积盆地流体矿产方面的研究和教学工作。E-mail:wangqingchun@sina.com;贺萍,1977年生,女,汉族,湖北黄冈人,工程师,硕士,主要从事沉积地质学及层序地层学方面的研究和教学工作。E-mail:heping1114@sina.com;杜江民,1984年生,男,汉族,河北平山人,讲师,博士,主要从事沉积学、储层地质学方面的研究工作。E-mail:jiangmindu@163.com;刘荣访,1964年生,女,汉族,河北深州人,副研究员,硕士,主要从事矿物学、岩石学方面的教学和研究工作。E-mail:1607147833@qq.com;李伟,1979年生,男,汉族,河北石家庄人,讲师,硕士,主要从事区域地质调查等方面的研究工作。E-mail:liwei797980@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（41172118）；河北省自然科学基金（D2013403018，D2012403010）；河北省教育厅青年基金（QN2015255）

Depositional Characteristics of the Zhaojiazhuang Formation, Changcheng System, in the Middle–Southern Areas of the Taihang Mountains

WANG Qingchun, HE Ping, DU Jiangmin, LIU Rongfang, LI Wei

The College of Resources, Hebei GEO University, Shijiazhuang, Hebei 050031, China

Received:2016-03-22 Revised:2017-03-02 Online:2017-08-01 Published:2017-08-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 前寒武纪沉积地层多因地质时代久远而受到过变质作用的强烈改造，因而沉积作用过程研究难度较大且较为薄弱。以详细的野外地质剖面测制工作为基础，结合区域地质背景资料分析，通过野外岩石类型鉴定、沉积构造鉴别及室内岩相古地理综合分析等，发现太行山中南段长城系赵家庄组发育陆相→海相的沉积岩相组合，主要形成环境为冲积扇相→潮坪相，地层顶底界线清晰，易于识别。赵家庄组完整的地层层序可划分为4段，包括粗碎屑岩层、砂岩页岩互层、页岩层和叠层石藻礁层，岩石类型丰富，地层沉积特征明显，具有明显的沉积环境指示作用，可以作为地质工作者进一步研究前寒武纪沉积环境及早期古生物的一个窗口。

关键词: 前寒武纪, 赵家庄组, 沉积特征, 华北克拉通, 冲积扇相, 潮坪相

Abstract: As Precambrian sedimentary strata have likely been rigorously transformed due to metamorphism over a long period of geological time, studies on this sedimentary process are often challenging and yield unconvincing results. Employing a detailed field geological profile analysis, combined with an analysis of the regional geological background, we identified rock types and sedimentary structures, and conducted a comprehensive analysis of lithofacies and palaeogeography. Our results showed that the terrestrial→marine sedimentary facies in the Zhaojiazhuang Formation, Changcheng system of the mid-southern areas in the Taihang Mountains were formed mainly by alluvial fan facies→tidal flat facies. The boundary between the top and bottom layers was clearly visible and identifiable. The complete stratigraphic sequence of the Zhaojiazhuang Formation can be divided into four sections:coarse clastic rock, sandstones/shale interbed, shale, and layered limestone reef. The rock types are abundant, and the stratigraphic sedimentary characteristics are prominent. These features are significant indicators of the sedimentary environment and can be used by geologists to study the Precambrian sedimentary environment and early paleontology.

Key words: Precambrian, Zhaojiazhuang Formation, depositional characteristics, North China Craton, alluvial fan facies, tidal flat facies

中图分类号:

TE121
P534.3

王青春, 贺萍, 杜江民, 刘荣访, 李伟. 太行山中南段长城系赵家庄组沉积特征[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(4): 47-56.

WANG Qingchun, HE Ping, DU Jiangmin, LIU Rongfang, LI Wei. Depositional Characteristics of the Zhaojiazhuang Formation, Changcheng System, in the Middle–Southern Areas of the Taihang Mountains[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2017, 39(4): 47-56.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/10.11885/j.issn.16745086.2016.03.22.04

http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/Y2017/V39/I4/47

参考文献

[1] 杜汝霖. 赵家庄组的建立及太行五台山区滹沱群与长城系的关系[J]. 河北地质学院学报,1984(1):2329. doi:10.13937/j.cnki.sjzjjxyxb.1984.01.002 DU Rulin. The establishment of Zhaojiazhuang Formation and the relationship between Hutuo Group and Changchengian in Taihang-Wutaishan Area[J]. Journal of Hebei College of Geology, 1984(1):23-29. doi:10.-13937/j.cnki.sjzjjxyxb.1984.01.002
[2] 杜汝霖. 前寒武纪古生物学及地史学[M]. 北京:地质出版社, 1992.
[3] 宋天锐. 北京十三陵地区中元古界长城系沉积相标志及沉积环境模式[J]. 古地理学报,2007,9(5):461472. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-1505.2007.05.004 SONG Tianrui. Sedimentary facies indicators and sedimentary environments models of the Changcheng system of Mesoproterozoic in Ming Tombs district, Beijing[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2007, 9(5):461-472. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-1505.2007.05.004
[4] 林晓辉,吴昌华. 燕山西段及太行山区长城系底界的讨论[J]. 地层学杂志, 2002, 26(1):4649. doi:10.3969/-j.issn.0253-4959.2002.01.007 LIN Xiaohui, WU Changhua. The basal boundary of the Changcheng system in the western Yanshan and Taihangshan[J]. Journal of Stratigraphy, 2002, 26(1):46-49. doi:10.3969/j.issn.0253-4959.2002.01.007
[5] 杜汝霖,李培菊,吴振山. 燕山西段震旦亚界[J]. 河北地质学院学报, 1979(4):117, 87. doi:10.13937/j.cnki.-sjzjjxyxb.1979.04.001 DU Rulin, LI Peiju, WU Zhenshan. Sinian suberathem in the western Yanshan mountains[J]. Journal of Hebei College of Geology, 1979(4):1-17, 87. doi:10.13937/j.cnki.-sjzjjxyxb.1979.04.001
[6] 孙立新,朱更新,黄学光,等. 燕山中段常州沟组底砾岩的成因类型[J]. 中国区域地质, 1999, 18(3):284288. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.1999.03.010 SUN Lixin, ZHU Gengxin, HUANG Xueguang, et al. Genetic types of basal conglomerate of the Changzhougou Formation in the central sector of the Yanshan mountains[J]. Regional Geology of China, 1999, 18(3):284-288. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-2552.1999.03.010
[7] 朱士兴,黄学光,孙淑芬. 华北燕山中元古界长城系研究的新进展[J]. 地层学杂志, 2005, 29(S1):437-449. ZHU Shixing, HUANG Xueguang, SUN Shufen. New progress in the research of the Mesoproterozoic Changcheng system (1800-1400 Ma) in the Yanshan range, north China[J]. Journal of Stratigraphy, 2005, 29(S1):437-449.
[8] 陈贤,张传恒,刘家军,等. 蓟县常州沟组沉积特征及其地质意义[J]. 地层学杂志, 2014, 38(2):236-244. CHEN Xian, ZHANG Chuanheng, LIU Jiajun, et al. Fluvial facies and geological significance in the Changzhougou Formation in the Jixian Area of China[J]. Journal of Stratigraphy, 2014, 38(2):236-244.
[9] 郭丽娜. 前寒武纪海侵碎屑岩系的沉积序列与层序地层划分以辽宁凌源剖面常州沟组为例[J]. 地层学杂志, 2014, 38(2):245-252. GUO Lina. Sedimentary characteristics and sequence stratigraphy of the Changzhougou Formation in the Lingyuan Area, Liaoning Province[J]. Journal of Stratigraphy, 2014, 38(2):245-252.
[10] 钟焱,赵亮东,陈留勤,等. 对华北中元古代海侵初期""河流相""沉积的重新认识:以天津蓟县剖面为例[J]. 古地理学报, 2011, 13(1):21-29. doi:10.7605/gdlxb.-2011.01.003 ZHONG Yan, ZHAO Liangdong, CHEN Liuqin, et al. New understanding of ""fluvial facies"" deposition of the early transgression period of Mesoproterozoic:An example from Jixian section in Tianjin[J]. Journal of Palaeogeography, 2011, 13(1):21-29. doi:10.7605/gdlxb.2011.-01.003
[11] 邱振,段先乐,潘志龙,等. 太行山长城系赵家庄组遗迹化石[J]. 沉积与特提斯, 2007, 27(1):76-78. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1009-3850.2007.01.014 QIU Zhen, DUAN Xianle, PAN Zhilong, et al. Trace fossils from the Changchengian Zhaojiazhuang Formation in the Taihang Mountains, Hebei[J]. Sedimentary Geology and Tethyan Geology, 2007, 27(1):76-78. doi:10.3969/-j.issn.1009-3850.2007.01.014
[12] 赵国春,孙敏, WILDE S A. 华北克拉通基底构造单元特征及早元古代拼合[J]. 中国科学(D辑), 2002, 32(7):538-549. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1006-9267.-2002.07.002 ZHAO Guochun, SUN Min, WILDE S A. Major tectonic units of the north China Craton and their Paleoproterozoic assembly[J]. Science in China (Series D), 2002, 32(7):538-549. doi:10.3321/j.issn:1006-9267.2002.07.002
[13] ROGERS J J W, SANTOSH M. Configuration of Columbia, a Mesoproterozoic supercontinent[J]. Gondwana Research, 2002, 5(1):5-22. doi:10.1016/S1342-937X(05)70883-2
[14] 陈晋镳. 中朝准地台中末元古代地质演化的初步探讨[J]. 地质论评, 1983, 29(1):1-8. doi:10.16509/-j.georeview.1983.01.001 CHEN Jinbiao. A Preliminary study on the geological evolution of Sino-Korea Paraplatform during middie to terminal Proterozoic[J]. Geological Review, 1983, 29(1):1-8. doi:10.16509/j.georeview.1983.01.001
[15] 和政军,孟祥化,葛铭. 燕山地区长城纪沉积演化及构造背景[J]. 沉积学报, 1994, 12(2):10-19. doi:10.-14027/j.cnki.cjxb.1994.02.002 HE Zhengjun, MENG Xianghua, GE Ming. Environmental evolutions and structural control of Changchengian of the mid-Proterozoic in the Yanshan Basin, north China[J]. Acta Sedimentologica Sinica, 1994, 12(2):10-19. doi:10.14027/j.cnki.cjxb.1994.02.002
[16] 温献德. 华北北部中、上元古界的大陆裂谷模式和地层划分[J]. 前寒武纪研究进展, 1997, 20(3):21-28. WEN Xiande. The faild rift model and stratigraphic division of middle-upper Proterozoic stratum in the northern part of north China[J]. Progress in Precambrian Research, 1997, 20(3):21-28.
[17] 李江海,刘守偈,侯贵廷. 华北中部古元古代末期构造热事件性质及其构造成因模式[J]. 中国地质, 2006, 33(6):1256-1266. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-3657.2006.06.008 LI Jianghai, LIU Shoujie, HOU Guiting. Nature of the latest Paleoproterozoic tectono-magmatic event in central north China and its tectonic genetic model[J]. Geology in China, 2006, 33(6):1256-1266. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-3657.2006.06.008
[18] 王鸿祯. 中国古地理图集[M]. 北京:地图出版社,1985:1283.
[19] 王鸿祯,乔秀夫. 中国元古代构造单元及其边界性质[M]. 北京:地质出版社, 1986:1-15. WANG Hongzhen, QIAO Xiufu. The tectonic units and the boundary behavior of Proterozoic in China[M]. Beijing:Geological Publishing House, 1986:1-15.
[20] 黄学光,朱士兴,贺玉贞. 蓟县中、新元古界剖面层序地层学研究的几个基本问题[J]. 前寒武纪研究进展, 2001, 24(4):201-221. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1672-4135.-2001.04.002 HUANG Xueguang, ZHU Shixing, HE Yuzhen. Some basic problems in research on sequence stratigraph of the Meso and Neoproterozoic strata in Jixian Area[J]. Progress in Precambrian Research, 2001, 24(4):201-221. doi:10.-3969/j.issn.1672-4135.2001.04.002
[21] 王立峰. 张河湾地质旅游实习教程[M]. 北京:地质出版社, 2010.
[22] 李博媛,张殿伟,庞雄奇,等. 川北米仓山地区震旦系灯影组差异化岩溶作用分析[J]. 天然气地球科学,2015,26(11):2075-2084. doi:10.11764/j.issn.1672-1926.2015.11.2075 LI Boyuan, ZHANG Dianwei, PANG Xiongqi, et al. Differential karstification analysis of the Sinian Dengying Formation in northern Sichuan[J]. Natural Gas Geoscience, 2015, 26(11):2075-2084. doi:10.11764/j.issn.-1672-1926.2015.11.2075
[23] 钱迈平,袁训来,徐学思,等. 徐淮地区新元古代叠层石组合[J]. 古生物学报, 2002, 41(3):403-418. doi:10.3969/j.issn.0001-6616.2002.03.009 QIAN Maiping, YUAN Xunlai, XU Xuesi, et al. An assemblage of the Neoproterozoic stromatolites from the Xuzhou-Huainan region[J]. Acta Palaeontologica Sinica, 2002, 41(3):403-418. doi:10.3969/j.issn.0001-6616.-2002.03.009
[24] 汪泽成,姜华,王铜山,等. 上扬子地区新元古界含油气系统与油气勘探潜力[J]. 天然气工业, 2014, 34(4):27-36. doi:10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2014.04.004 WANG Zecheng, JIANG Hua, WANG Tongshan, et al. Hydrocarbon systems and exploration potentials of Neoproterozoic in the upper Yangtze Region[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2014, 34(4):27-36. doi:10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2014.04.004
[25] 张健,沈平,杨威,等. 四川盆地前震旦纪沉积岩新认识与油气勘探的意义[J]. 天然气工业, 2012, 32(7):15. doi:10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2012.07.001 ZHANG Jian, SHEN Ping, YANG Wei, et al. New understandings of Pre-Sinian sedimentary rocks in the Sichuan Basin and the significance of oil and gas exploration there[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2012, 32(7):1-5. doi:10.-3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2012.07.001
[26] 魏国齐,杨威,杜金虎,等. 四川盆地震旦纪早寒武世克拉通内裂陷地质特征[J]. 天然气工业, 2015, 35(1):24-35. doi:10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2015.01.-003 WEI Guoqi, YANG Wei, DU Jinhu, et al. Geological characteristics of the Sinian-Early Cambrian intracratonic rift, Sichuan Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2015, 35(1):24-35. doi:10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2015.01.003
[27] 邓昆,张哨楠,周立发,等. 鄂尔多斯盆地西南缘蓟县系沉积环境与生烃潜力[J]. 天然气工业, 2009, 29(3):21-24. doi:10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2009.03.006 DENG Kun, ZHANG Shaonan, ZHOU Lifa, et al. Depositional environment and hydrocarbon-generating potential of the Mesoproterozoic Jixian system in the southwest margin of Ordos Basin[J]. Natural Gas Industry, 2009, 29(3):21-24. doi:10.3787/j.issn.1000-0976.2009.03.006
[28] 史晓颖,张传恒,蒋干清,等. 华北地台中元古代碳酸盐岩中的微生物成因构造及其生烃潜力[J]. 现代地质, 2008, 22(5):669-682. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-8527.2008.05.001 SHI Xiaoying, ZHANG Chuanheng, JIANG Ganqing, et al. Microbial mats from the Mesoproterozoic carbonates of the north China platform and their potential for hydrocarbon-generation[J]. Geoscience, 2008, 22(5):669-682. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-8527.2008.05.001

太行山中南段长城系赵家庄组沉积特征

Depositional Characteristics of the Zhaojiazhuang Formation, Changcheng System, in the Middle–Southern Areas of the Taihang Mountains

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	吴群, 杨云飞, 王树芳. 南阳凹陷黑龙庙地区近岸水下扇沉积特征研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(1): 33-44.
[2]	韩建斌, 田晓平, 康凯, 申春生, 汪利兵. KL油田沙三下亚段混合沉积特征及演化[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 40(5): 37-46.
[3]	许磊, 王宗俊, 王盘根, 商志垒, 郭晓. 准噶尔盆地东缘J₁b¹扇三角洲沉积特征研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 40(4): 9-16.
[4]	苏向光*. 海拉尔盆地苏仁诺尔油田浊积岩沉积特征[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 37(2): 82-86.
[5]	范小军. 元坝地区长兴组沉积特征及对储层的控制作用[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 37(2): 39-48.
[6]	邓剑1，段金宝1，王正和2，王明筏1. 川东北元坝地区长兴组生物礁沉积特征研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2014, 36(4): 63-72.
[7]	马明福;贾赢;张春书. 阿尔及利亚D 区块储层特征及影响因素分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 34(5): 25-30.
[8]	秦飞;姚光庆;马伟竣;张磊;金燕林;. 泌阳凹陷付湾—张厂地区砂坝微相沉积特征[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2012, 34(3): 24-32.
[9]	刘晖;操应长;袁静;王升兰. 胜坨地区沙四上亚段砂砾岩类型及储层特征[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2010, 32(5): 15-15.
[10]	张雷;刘招君杨婷杜江峰侯伟 . 孙吴—嘉荫盆地淘淇河组湖底扇沉积特征[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2009, 31(3): 57-61.
[11]	庞雯浚茂. 轮南地区三叠系辫状河三角洲沉积储层特征[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2008, 30(1): 58-62.
[12]	陈景山唐青松代宗仰谭秀成刘景环. 特征不同的两种扇三角洲相识别与对比[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 29(4): 1-6.
[13]	孙钰钟建华姜在兴王志坤高祥成. 惠民凹陷基山砂体沉积特征及成藏条件[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2007, 29(1): 40-43.
[14]	廖光明. 范庄油田阜宁组沉积体系及砂体建筑结构分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2006, 28(2): 4-7.
[15]	宋章强;王兴志;曾德铭 . 川西北二叠纪栖霞期沉积相及其与油气的关系[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2005, 27(6): 20-24.