Influence Factors of Ultrasound Breast Lesion Classification with BI-RADS Category 3 and 4A

Abstract

Abstract:

Objective: To investigate the effects of age and the lesions size on diagnosis of category 3 and 4A in breast imaging report
and data system（BI-RADS）. Methods: Age, lesions size and ultrasound lesion classification according to the BI-RADS of 405 cases（240 cases diagnosed BI-RADS category 3 and 165 cases diagnosed BI-RADS category 4A）of reports were conducted a retrospective analysis. Results: Among 240 cases BI-RADS category 3 lesions, 240 cases（100%）were benign, and no case（0%）was malignant.While among 165 cases BI-RADS category 4A lesions, there were 158 cases of benign（95.76%）, and 7 cases of malignant（4.24%）.Data showed a statistical significance between age difference and diagnosis classification（P<0.05）, but no statistical significance between lesion size and diagnosis classificatio（P>0.05）. The age of patients were found to have significant influence on pathological diagnosis in category 4A lesions（P<0.05）. Conclusion: Age, but not lesion size, significantly influenced breast lesions diagnosis with BI-RADS category 3 and 4 A.

Key words: BI-RADS category, age of patients, ultrasound diagnosis, influence factors

CLC Number:

R445.1

Liu Taixia, Liu Qingqing. Influence Factors of Ultrasound Breast Lesion Classification with BI-RADS Category 3 and 4A[J]. J4, 2016, 15(2): 55-57.

References

〔1〕OHLINGER R，KLEIN G M，KOHLER G. Ultrasound of
the breast - value of sonographic criteria for the differential
diagnosis of solid lesions〔J〕. Ultraschall Med，2004，25（1）：
48-53.
〔2〕STAVROS A T，THICKMAN D，RAPP C L，et al. Solid breast
nodules：use of sonography to distinguish between benign
and malignant lesions〔J〕. Radiology，1995，196：123-134.
〔3〕American College of Radiology.Breast imaging reporting and
data system（BI—RADS），4th ed VA〔M〕. Reston：Amen?
can College of Radiology，2003：77-79.
〔4〕姜郁.超声BI-RADS 3级乳腺病灶的回顾性分析〔D〕.苏
州：苏州大学，2014.
〔5〕周维，司徒明珠，杜岳武，等.比较乳腺影像报告与数据系
统在不同年龄人群中的应用价值〔J〕. 浙江临床医学，
2015，17（1）：120-121.
〔6〕GIESS C S，SMEGLIN L Z，MEYER J E，et al. Risk of
malignancy in palpable solid breast masses considered
probably benign or low suspicion：implications for manage?
ment〔J〕. J Ultrasound Med，2012，31（12）：1343-1360.
〔7〕段颖，管玲，王卫丽，等. 乳腺超声BI-RADS 3级病变影
响因素的回顾性分析〔J〕. 甘肃医药，2015，34（6）：415-
418.
〔8〕王立平. 超声BI-RADS 3 级乳腺结节的阳性预测值
（PPV）及影响其分级因素分析〔D〕. 杭州：浙江大学，
2012.
〔9〕石健，王彬，刘荫华.乳腺高频彩色多普勒超声检查中应
用BI-RADS分级诊断标准对乳腺疾病的诊断价值〔J〕.
中国医学影像技术，2010，26（5）：877-880.
〔10〕YOON J H，KIM M J，MOON H J，et al. Subcategoriza?
tion of ultrasonographic bi-rads category 4：positive predic?
tive value and clinical factors affecting it〔J〕. Ultrasound
Med Biol，2011，37（5）：693-699.

[1]	He Cuiyun, Zhou Hongwei, Wu Xiaoxiao, Zhang Yanhua, Li Yaping. A Correlative Analysis of Ultrasound-detected Calcification in#br# Thyroid Nodules and Thyroid Cancer [J]. Journal of Dali University, 2019, 4(2): 79-.
[2]	SHU Xiao-Li, XIAO Juan, WEI Yan-Ni, LU Hui-Xia. Study of the Role of Health Education in Improving Self-management Efficacy of Inpatients with Diabetes Mellitus [J]. , 2018, 3(8): 88-92.
[3]	Pang Xingmei, Chen Duanzhen, He Weiyaozhen, Song Wenjuan, Dong Zhijian. An Analysis of Ultrasound Diagnosis and Clinical Manifestation of Ectopic Pregnancy [J]. J4, 2015, 14(2): 51-53.
[4]	LI Yan-Peng, YANG Jie- , XIAO Wen, YANG Jian-Fang. Research about the Nutrients of Sedimenin in Erhai Lake and Three Upstream Primary Lakes [J]. J4, 2013, 12(4): 58-60.