西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 21 ›› Issue (3): 95-100.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5094.2019.01.03.02

• 理论探索 • 上一篇    下一篇

试论《昌黎先生集考异》创作的理学目的

赵聃   

  1. 西南石油大学马克思主义学院, 四川 成都 610500
  • 收稿日期:2019-01-03 出版日期:2019-05-01 发布日期:2019-05-01
  • 作者简介:赵聃(1986-),男(汉族),湖南常德人,讲师,博士,研究方向:朱子学。

A Discussion on the Neo-Confucianism Purpose of Textual Research of the Collection of Hanyu's Works

Zhao Dan   

  1. School of Marxism, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu Sichuan, 610500, China
  • Received:2019-01-03 Online:2019-05-01 Published:2019-05-01

摘要: 《昌黎先生集考异》作为朱熹校勘学的代表,钱穆认为其“超前绝后”“开出后来校勘学上无穷法门”。但朱,熹并非为校勘而校勘,其根本目的在于借校勘韩文来批评韩愈的儒家经学思想并阐释自己的理学思想,主要表现在:通过批评韩愈不懂“践履玩味”,提出在日常学习生活中践行“仁义道德”的方法;通过批评韩愈不讲道之体,只“说得用”,提出道乃“古今共由之理”;通过批评韩愈“举说《大学》,而不说‘致知在格物’”,提出格物致知是《大学》所包涵的重要内容;通过批评韩愈“论性不论气”,提出论性必兼气、性气相依存的观点;通过批评韩愈“用力深处,终不离乎文字言语之工”,提出“文皆是从道中流出”的文道观;通过批评韩愈不重涵养省察自身修养,提出以“存养省察”为重要内容的道德修养论。

关键词: 朱熹, 《昌黎先生集考异》, 理学, 格物致知, 文道合一, 存养省察

Abstract: Textual Research of the Collection of Hanyu's Works, the master piece of Zhu Xi's textual criticism, is regarded by Qian Mu as“ahead of the times”and“opening up approaches for later textual criticism studies”. However,Zhu xi did not collate for collation's sake. His purpose was to criticize Han Yu's Confucianism and then explain his own Neo-Confucianism thoughts by collating Han's works. The main manifestations are as follows: by criticizing Han Yu's ignorance of“practicing”, he put forward the method of practicing“humanity, justice and morality”in daily life;by criticizing Han Yu's lack of Taoist style, he put forward that Tao is“principle of both the ancient and the modern”;by criticizing Han Yu talking about the Great Learning but never mention“Knowledge is acquired through experience”, which is an important content in the Great Learning; by criticizing Han Yu's view of“discussing the human nature regardless of the spirit”, he put forward the viewpoint that human nature and the spirit depend on each other; and by criticizing Han Yu was always in the process of writing and speech, he put forward that“the origin of literature is from Tao”; by criticizing Han Yu for not paying attention to self-cultivation and self-examination, he put forward the moral cultivation theory with“self-cultivation and self-examination” as the important content.

Key words: Zhu Xi, Textual Research of the Collection of Hanyu's Works, Neo-Confucianism, acquiring knowledge through experience, integration of literature and Taoism, self-cultivation and self-examination

中图分类号: