西南石油大学学报(社会科学版) ›› 2011, Vol. 4 ›› Issue (5): 53-59.DOI: 10.3863/j.issn.1674-5094.2011.05.010

• 政治学与法学 • 上一篇    下一篇

美国反垄断法私人实施制度

柳镭   

  1. 湖南大学法学院,湖南 长沙 410082
  • 收稿日期:1900-01-01 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2011-09-20

PRIVATE ENFORCEMENT OF ANTITRUST LAW IN THE UNITED STATES

LIU Lei   

  1. Law School,Hunan University,Changsha Hunan 410082,China
  • Received:1900-01-01 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2011-09-20

摘要: 美国现行的反垄断法实施制度,是一个由公共实施制度和私人实施制度组成的相互补充、共同作用的统一体。私人实施在其整个制度中所扮演的举足轻重的角色在世界范围内颇具特色。自《谢尔曼法》颁布至今,反垄断法私人实施在美国已经历经了一百多年的发展历程,相关具体规则与司法实践有许多可圈可点之处。反垄断法实施制度的功能和目标主要是对理性行为主体的威慑、为垄断行为导致的危害后果提供救济,以及解释、明确反垄断法针对对象的范围和实施标准。私人实施在实现这些功能方面有着特殊的作用。我国反垄断法的私人实施制度相关规则有待进一步的细化和完善,在此过程中应当注重研究、借鉴和扬弃美国的经验。

关键词: 美国法律, 垄断, 反垄断法, 损害赔偿, 私人实施制度

Abstract: Antitrust law enforcement system in the United State comprises private enforcement and public enforcement,with the two sectors complementing,checking and balancing each other.The significant role that private antitrust action plays in the United States is quite unique.Since the Sherman Act,private enforcement of antitrust law has been developing in us jurisdiction over a hundred years.Its specific rules and judicial practice is worthy of note.The major functions and objectives of antitrust enforcement are deterrence and remediation in addition to explanation and clarification of the antitrust law and its application standards.Private action has a particular impact on the achievement of these goals.China′s private antitrust enforcement needs further refinement.During the process,special attention should be directed to the experience of the United States,and relevant lessons should be carefully researched.

Key words: American law, monopoly, antitrust law, damage compensation, private enforcement

中图分类号: