水平井带扶正器套管接触方式及其对摩阻影响

doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2019.04.08.02

西南石油大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2020, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (2): 158-165.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2019.04.08.02

水平井带扶正器套管接触方式及其对摩阻影响

胡锡辉¹, 李维¹, 徐璧华², 马旌伦¹, 袁彬²

1. 中国石油西南油气田分公司, 四川成都 610017;
2. 油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室·西南石油大学, 四川成都 610500

收稿日期:2019-04-08 出版日期:2020-04-10 发布日期:2020-04-10
通讯作者: 徐璧华,E-mail:xubh@vip.163.com
作者简介:胡锡辉,1966年生,男,汉族,四川武胜人,高级工程师,主要从事钻井技术研究工作。E-mail:huxihui@petrochina.com.cn;李维,1983年生,男,汉族,四川中江人,工程师,硕士,主要从事钻井工程管理及相关科研工作。E-mail:l_wei@petrochina.com.cn;徐璧华,1964年生,男,汉族,重庆壁山人,副教授,硕士,主要从事油气井固井水泥浆体系研究和水泥环力学性能方面的工作。E-mail:xubh@vip.163.com;马旌伦,1992年生,男,汉族,四川江油人,工程师,主要从事钻井技术研究工作。E-mail:ma_jl@petrochina.com.cn;袁彬,1987年生,男,汉族,重庆垫江人,博士研究生,主要从事油气井固井水泥浆体系研究和水泥环腐蚀机理方面的工作。E-mail:yuanbin19880118@126.com

Contact Forms of Casing with Centralizer and Its Effect on Friction

HU Xihui¹, LI Wei¹, XU Bihua², MA Jinglun¹, YUAN Bin²

1. Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company, PetroChina, Chengdu, Sichuan 610017, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China

Received:2019-04-08 Online:2020-04-10 Published:2020-04-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 下套管作业过程中，由于重力与井眼轨迹影响，将导致套管发生弯曲，与井壁发生接触，从而产生附加摩阻，当摩阻较大时会影响套管顺利下入。尤其是水平井为保证顶替效率和固井质量，下套管时加入了大量扶正器，扶正器的加入将增大套管的摩阻系数，从而给水平井下套管作业带来了更大的困难。针对这一问题，首先，提出套管与井壁有3种接触方式，即自由状态、点接触与线接触；并指出不同接触方式下产生的摩阻不同。然后，通过建立了套管在下入过程中的扰曲受力方程，以及套管与井壁接触方式判断模型；并根据该模型分段计算方式准确地计算出不同接触方式下套时的管摩阻。通过现场示例分析表明，该方法能准确预测摩阻，对现场计算摩阻具有很好的指导意义。

关键词: 水平井, 下套管, 接触方式, 扶正器, 摩擦阻力

Abstract: During the running casing operation, the casing will be bent and contact the well wall due to the influence of gravity and well trajectory. Therefore, an additional friction is generated, which affects running casing when it is too large. In particular, a large number of centralizers are used to ensure displacement efficiency and cementing quality in horizontal wells, which brings greater difficulties to running casing operations due to the increase of friction coefficient. Aiming to this problem, the paper first points out the three contact forms of the casing and the well wall:free state, point contact and line contact. It is also points out that the friction is different under different contact form. Then, the casing tortuous equation and contact from judgment model are built. According to the model segmentation calculation method, the friction of the casing under different contact modes is accurately calculated. The field example analysis shows that the method can accurately predict the friction and has a good guiding significance for calculating the friction.

Key words: horizontal well, running casings, contact form, centralizer, frictional resistance

中图分类号:

TE256⁺.2

胡锡辉, 李维, 徐璧华, 马旌伦, 袁彬. 水平井带扶正器套管接触方式及其对摩阻影响[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(2): 158-165.

HU Xihui, LI Wei, XU Bihua, MA Jinglun, YUAN Bin. Contact Forms of Casing with Centralizer and Its Effect on Friction[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(2): 158-165.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2019.04.08.02

http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/Y2020/V42/I2/158

参考文献

[1] ZHAO Chaojie, LI Jun, LIU Gonghui, et al. Analysis of the influence of cement sheath failure on sustained casing pressure in shale gas wells[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2019, 66:244-254. doi:10.1016/j.jngse.2019.04.003
[2] WANG Chaowen, JIA Chunsheng, PENG Xiaolong, et al. Effects of wellbore interference on concurrent gas production from multi-layered tight sands:A case study in eastern Ordos Basin, China[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2019, 179:707-715. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2019.04.110
[3] CAI Laixing, XIAO Guolin, LU Shuangfang, et al. Spatial-temporal coupling between high-quality source rocks and reservoirs for tight sandstone oil and gas accumulations in the Songliao Basin, China[J]. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology, 2019, 29(3):387-397. doi:10.1016/j.ijmst.2019.03.006
[4] 李勇明,陈希,江有适,等. 页岩储层压裂水平井气水两相产能分析[J]. 油气地质与采收率, 2019, 26(3):117-122. doi:10.13673/j.cnki.cn37-1359/te.2019.03.016 LI Yongming, CHEN Xi, JIANG Youshi, et al. Gas-water two-phase productivity analysis for the fractured horizontal well in shale reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology and Recovery Efficiency, 2019, 26(3):117-122. doi:10.13673/j.cnki.cn37-1359/te.2019.03.016
[5] NIE Zhen, ZHANG Zhenyou, LUO Huihong, et al. Key technologies for directional well drilling in high-pressure anhydrite salt layers[J]. Natural Gas Industry B, 2018, 5(6):598-605. doi:10.1016/j.ngib.2018.11.008
[6] GUO Jing, FAN Song, LIU Tao, et al. Exploration and practice of integrated control technology for tubing and sucker rod lopsided wearing in directional well[J]. IOP Conference Series:Earth and Environmental Science, 2018, 208(1):26-28. doi:10.1088/1755-1315/208/1/0120-21
[7] 张珍. ZX105井卡套管事故原因分析及处理工艺[J]. 钻井液与完井液, 2018, 35(3):84-88. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2018.03.014 ZHANG Zhen. Analyses of the cause of casing sticking in Well ZX105 and the techniques of freeing the sticking[J]. Drilling Fluid & Completion Fluid, 2018, 35(3):84-88. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-5620.2018.03.014
[8] 陈颖超. 基于有限元分析的水平井套管柱下入过程模拟[J]. 承德石油高等专科学校学报, 2019, 21(1):26-29, 44. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9446.2019.01.008 CHEN Yingchao. Simulation of casing string down process in horizontal wells based on finite element analysis[J]. Journal of Chengde Petroleum College, 2019, 21(1):26-29, 44. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1008-9446.2019.01.008
[9] 杨广国,陶谦,刘伟,等. 页岩气井固井套管居中与下入能力研究[J]. 石油机械, 2012, 40(10):26-30. doi:10.16082/j.cnki.issn.1001-4578.2012.10.010 YANG Guangguo, TAO Qian, LIU Wei, et al. Research on the running and centralization of casing in shale gas well[J]. China Petroleum Machinery, 2012, 40(10):26-30. doi:10.16082/j.cnki.issn.1001-4578.2012.10.010
[10] 魏殿举. 川西地区中浅水平井钻井难点与对策[J]. 钻采工艺, 2015, 38(2):10.107. doi:10.3969/J.ISSN.1006-768X.2015.02.31
[11] 王秀文,刘巨保,黄金波,等. 固井过程套管串屈曲变形分析[J]. 石油矿场机械, 2011, 40(4):17-21. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3482.2011.04.005 WANG Xiuwen, LIU Jubao, HUANG Jinbo, et al. Analysis of buckling deformation about casing in cementing[J]. Oil Field Equipment, 2011, 40(4):17-21. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1001-3482.2011.04.005
[12] 李子丰. 油气井杆管柱力学研究进展与争论[J]. 石油学报,2016,37(4):531-556. doi:10.7623/syxb201604013 LI Zifeng. Research advances and debates on tubular mechanics in oil and gas wells[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2016, 37(4):531-556. doi:10.7623/syxb201604013
[13] 牛成成,郑德帅,杨顺辉,等. 大位移井套管下入摩阻预测新方法[J]. 科学技术与工程, 2014, 14(6):130-134. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2014.06.029 NIU Chengcheng, ZHENG Deshuai, YANG Shunhui, et al. The new drag prediction method of casing string in extended reach wells[J]. Science Technology and Engineering, 2014, 14(6):130-134. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1671-1815.2014.06.029
[14] 刘晓坡,廖前华,李刚. 软件预测摩阻-随钻校正摩阻系数方法及其在BZ34-1-D6大位移井钻井中的应用[J]. 中国海上油气, 2010, 22(5):320-322, 348. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-1506.2010.05.009 LIU Xiaopo, LIAO Qianhua, LI Gang. The method of friction prediction with software before drilling and friction factor correction while drilling and its application in extended reach Well BZ34-1-D6[J]. China Offshore Oil and Gas, 2010, 22(5):320-322, 348. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-1506.2010.05.009
[15] 黄志强. 定向井下套管摩阻数值计算及其应用[J]. 石油地质与工程, 2009, 23(4):79-81. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8217.2009.04.027 HUANG Zhiqiang. Computation and application of friction number of casing running in directional well[J]. Petroleum Geology and Engineering, 2009, 23(4):79-81. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1673-8217.2009.04.027
[16] 付建红,龚龙祥,胡顺渠,等. 基于ANSYS的水平井下套管摩阻分析计算[J]. 石油钻采工艺, 2007, 29(4):32-35. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7393.2007.04.009 FU Jianhong, GONG Longxiang, HU Shunqu, et al. Calculation of frictional drag of casing running in horizontal well based on ANSYS[J]. Oil Drilling & Production Technology, 2007, 29(4):32-35. doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-7393.2007.04.009
[17] 王治国,徐璧华,陈超,等. 复杂井眼条件下扶正器对套管下入摩阻的影响研究[J]. 钻采工艺, 2014, 37(1):27-30. doi:10.3969/J.ISSN.1006-768X.2014.01.09 WANG Zhiguo, XU Bihua, CHEN Chao, et al. Centralizer's influences on casing friction under the condition of complicated borehole[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2014, 37(1):27-30. doi:10.3969/J.ISSN.1006-768X.2014.01.09
[18] 张海山,张凯敏,宫吉泽,等. 不同类型扶正器对水平井下套管摩阻的影响研究[J]. 钻采工艺, 2014, 37(3):22-25. doi:10.3969/J.ISSN.1006-768X.2014.03.07 ZHANG Haishan, ZHANG Kaimin, GONG Jize, et al. Study on influence of different types of centralizer on running casing friction in horizional well[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2014, 37(3):22-25. doi:10.3969/J.ISSN.1006-768X.2014.03.07
[19] 游尧,陈英明,姜韡,等. 考虑扶正器影响的套管摩阻计算方法研究[J]. 长江大学学报(自科版), 2014, 11(1):71-73. YOU Yao, CHEN Yingming, JIANG Wei, et al. Study on casing friction calculation method considering the effect of centralizer[J]. Journal of Yangtze University (Natural Science Edition), 2014, 11(1):71-73.
[20] 付建红,黄贵生,杨志彬,等. 水平井套管扶正器合理安放位置计算[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版),2008,30(6):89-91,172. doi:10.3863/j.issn.1000-2634.2008.06.021 FU Jianhong, HUANG Guisheng, YANG Zhibin, et al. Optimal spacing for casing centralizers in horizontal well[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2008, 30(6):89-91, 172. doi:10.3863/j.issn.1000-2634.2008.06.021
[21] 朱炳坤,刘江,窦益华. 造斜井段中套管柱挠曲变形分析[J]. 钻采工艺, 2016, 39(1):96-98. doi:10.3969/J.ISSN.1006-768X.2016.01.28 ZHU Bingkun, LIU Jiang, DOU Yihua. The deflection analysis of casing string in making inclination segment[J]. Drilling & Production Technology, 2016, 39(1):96-98. doi:10.3969/J.ISSN.1006-768X.2016.01.28

水平井带扶正器套管接触方式及其对摩阻影响

Contact Forms of Casing with Centralizer and Its Effect on Friction

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈雪, 徐剑良, 黎菁, 肖剑锋, 钟思存. 威远区块页岩气水平井产量主控因素分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(5): 63-74.
[2]	张博宁, 张芮菡, 吴婷婷, 鲁友常. 致密气藏多级压裂水平井生产动态机理分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(5): 107-117.
[3]	黄亮, 王国荣, 徐靖, 魏安超, 贾杜平. 水平井完井管柱振动特性实验研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(5): 170-178.
[4]	何小川, 欧家强. 磨溪雷一¹气藏高效开发主体技术与成效[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(4): 144-154.
[5]	钟文建, 李双贵, 熊宇楼, 付建红, 苏昱. 超深水平井钻柱动力学研究及强度校核[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(4): 135-143.
[6]	张烈辉, 崔乾晨, 谢军, 郑健, 李成勇. 页岩气藏压裂水平井线性耦合渗流模型研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 1-12.
[7]	程小伟, 张高寅, 马志超, 李斌, 辜涛. 页岩气水平井油井水泥的原位增韧技术研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 68-74.
[8]	杨兆中, 李扬, 李小刚, 李成勇. 页岩气水平井重复压裂关键技术进展及启示[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 75-86.
[9]	马天寿, 彭念, 陈平, 邓智中. 页岩气水平井井壁裂缝起裂力学行为研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 87-99.
[10]	李勇明, 骆昂, 吴磊, 伊向艺. 考虑应力敏感和水力裂缝方位角的页岩产能模型[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 117-123.
[11]	方全堂, 李政澜, 段永刚, 魏明强, 张羽翼. 考虑次生裂缝的页岩气藏有限导流缝网模型[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 139-145.
[12]	付建红, 苏昱, 姜伟, 钟成旭, 李郑涛. 深层页岩气水平井井筒瞬态温度场研究与应用[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 165-173.
[13]	欧成华, 杨晓, 梁成钢, 黄毅, 朱海燕. 页岩小层水平井对比及其构造三维可视化表征[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 44-50.
[14]	王国亭, 孙建伟, 黄锦袖, 韩江晨, 朱玉杰. 神木气田低渗致密储层特征与水平井开发评价[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(5): 1-9.
[15]	张烈辉, 刘沙, 雍锐, 李博, 赵玉龙. 基于EDFM的致密油藏分段压裂水平井数值模拟[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(4): 1-11.