页岩气藏压裂水平井线性耦合渗流模型研究

doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2019.09.16.13

西南石油大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 1-12.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2019.09.16.13

• 页岩气开发专刊 • 下一篇

页岩气藏压裂水平井线性耦合渗流模型研究

张烈辉¹, 崔乾晨¹, 谢军², 郑健³, 李成勇⁴

1. 油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室·西南石油大学, 四川成都 610500;
2. 中国石油西南油气田公司, 四川成都 610051;
3. 四川长宁天然气开发有限责任公司, 四川成都 610051;
4. 成都理工大学能源学院, 四川成都 610059

收稿日期:2019-09-16 出版日期:2019-12-10 发布日期:2019-12-10
通讯作者: 张烈辉,E-mail:zhangliehui@vip.163.com
作者简介:张烈辉,1967年生,男,汉族,四川仁寿人,教授,博士生导师,主要从事非常规油气藏开发、数值模拟、试井分析等方面的教学与科研工作。E-mail:zhangliehui@vip.163.com;崔乾晨,1995年生,男,汉族,山东龙口人,硕士研究生,主要从事油气藏渗流力学及试井分析方面的研究工作。E-mail:297316383@qq.com;谢军,1968年生,男,汉族,四川巴中人,教授级高级工程师,主要从事常规和非常规油气田开发等方面的管理及研究工作。E-mail:Xiejun01@petrochina.com.cn;郑健,1979年生,男,汉族,云南昆明人,高级工程师,主要从事页岩气地震勘探开发、综合地质方面的研究工作。E-mail:zheng_jian@petrochina.com.cn;李成勇,1981年生,男,汉族,重庆开县人,教授,主要从事复杂油气藏渗流理论及应用领域的教学和科研工作。E-mail:lichengyong1981@126.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（51874251）；四川省科技计划重点研发项目（2018JZ0079）；中国石油天然气股份有限公司重大科技专项（2016E-0611）

Linear Coupling Seepage Model for Fractured Horizontal Wells in Shale Gas Reservoir

ZHANG Liehui¹, CUI Qianchen¹, XIE Jun², ZHENG Jian³, LI Chengyong⁴

1. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China;
2. Southwest Oil and Gas Field Company, PetroChina, Chengdu, Sichuan 610051, China;
3. Sichuan Changning Natural Gas Development Company Limited, Chengdu, Sichuan 610051, China;
4. College of Energy, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China

Received:2019-09-16 Online:2019-12-10 Published:2019-12-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为研究页岩基质孔隙中气体低速流动时启动压力梯度对试井的影响、解决页岩气复杂流动机理耦合的困难，提出了一种新的圆柱状三重孔隙页岩基质模型，并与五线性渗流模型结合，建立了表征气体流动过程的多级压裂水平井线性耦合渗流模型；应用Laplace变换、Green函数等方法得到模型的解，利用Stehfest数值反演算法计算并绘制了气井无因次拟压力响应曲线并进行敏感性分析。结果表明，基于新模型的压力响应曲线可划分为七个流动阶段；启动压力梯度主要影响曲线的中晚期阶段，若启动压力梯度越大，则渗流阻力越大、拟压力及其导数值越大；基质渗透率越小，则基质向裂缝系统窜流越困难、边界控制流动阶段发生时间越晚。

关键词: 页岩气, 压裂水平井, 页岩三重孔隙基质, 启动压力梯度, 压力响应

Abstract: In order to study the effects of threshold pressure gradient at low-velocity gas flow in shale matrix on well test curves, and to overcome the difficulties of coupling of flow mechanism of shale gas, a new cylindrical triple-porosity shale matrix model was proposed. Combined with the five-region flow model, a new linear seepage model characterizing flow process of multifractured horizontal wells was established. Laplace transformation and Green function were employed to solve the model, and the Stehfest numerical inversion algorithm was applied to plot dimensionless pseudo-pressure curves and conduct sensitivity analysis. The results show that pressure response curves of the new model could be divided into 7 periods and the threshold pressure gradient conspicuously affects the middle and later periods. The lager the threshold pressure gradient is, the larger seepage resistance is, and the higher pseudo-pressure and its derivative are. The smaller the matrix permeability is, the more difficult it is for transition flow from matrix to fractures, and the later the boundary control flow occurs.

Key words: shale gas, fractured horizontal well, triple-porosity shale matrix, threshold pressure gradient, pressure response

中图分类号:

TE319

张烈辉, 崔乾晨, 谢军, 郑健, 李成勇. 页岩气藏压裂水平井线性耦合渗流模型研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 1-12.

ZHANG Liehui, CUI Qianchen, XIE Jun, ZHENG Jian, LI Chengyong. Linear Coupling Seepage Model for Fractured Horizontal Wells in Shale Gas Reservoir[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 1-12.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2019.09.16.13

http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/Y2019/V41/I6/1

参考文献

[1] SONG Bo. Pressure transient analysis and production analysis for New Albany Shale Gas Wells[D]. Texas:Texas A & M University, 2010.
[2] CURTIS J B. Fractured shale gas systems[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2002, 86(11):1921-1938. doi:10.1306/61eeddbe-173e-11d7-8645000102c1865d
[3] BELLO R O, WATTENBARGER R A. Rate transient analysis in naturally fractured shale gas reservoirs[C]. SPE 144057-MS, 2011. doi:10.2118/114591-MS
[4] OZKAN E, RAGHAVAN R S, APAYDIN O G. Modeling of fluid transfer from shale matrix to fracture network[C]. SPE 134830-MS. doi:10.2118/134830-MS
[5] CARLSON E S, MERCER J C. Devonian shale gas production:Mechanisms and simple models[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1991, 43(4):476-482. doi:10.1016/0148-9062(91)91279-Z
[6] ZHAO Yulong, ZHANG Liehui, LUO Jianxin, et al. Performance of fractured horizontal well with stimulated reservoir volume in uncon-ventional gas reservoir[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2014, 512:447-456. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2014.03.026
[7] 谢亚雄,刘启国,王卫红,等. 页岩气藏多段压裂水平井产能预测模型[J]. 大庆石油地质与开发, 2016, 35(5):163-169. doi:10.3969/J.ISSN.1000-3754.2016.05.033 XIE Yaxiong, LIU Qiguo, WANG Weihong, et al. Productivity predicting model of the multi-stage fractured horizontal wells in shale gas reservoirs[J]. Petroleum Geology & Oilfield Development in Daqing, 2016, 35(5):163-169. doi:doi:10.3969/J.ISSN.1000-3754.2016.05.-033
[8] CASTILLO F, AGUILERA R, LAWTON D. Integration of seismic data and a triple porosity model for interpretation of tight gas formations in the western Canada sedimentary basin[C]. SPE 149496-MS, 2011. doi:10.2118/149496-MS
[9] GALE J F W, REED R M, HOLDER J. Natural fractures in the Barnett Shale and their importance for hydraulic fracture treatments[J]. AAPG Bulletin, 2007, 91(4):603-622. doi:10.1306/11010606061
[10] ROGERS S, ELMO D, DUNPHY R, et al. Understanding hydraulic fracture geometry and interactions in the Horn River Basin through DFN and numerical modeling[J]. SPE 10.2118/137488-MS, 2011. doi:10.2118/137488-MS
[11] DEHGHANPOUR H, SHIRDEL M. A triple porosity model for shale gas reservoirs[C]. SPE 149501-MS, 2011. doi:10.2118/149501-MS
[12] TIAN Leng, XIAO Congxiao, LIU Mingjin, et al. Well testing model for multi-fractured horizontal well for shale gas reservoirs with consideration of dual diffusion in matrix[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2014, 21:283-295. doi:10.1016/j.jngse.2014.08.001
[13] HUANG Ting, GUO Xiao, CHEN Feifei. Modeling transient pressure behavior of a fractured well for shale gas reservoirs based on the properties of nanopores[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2015, 23:387-398. doi:10.1016/j.jngse.2015.02.020
[14] 高杰,张烈辉,刘启国,等. 页岩气藏压裂水平井三线性流试井模型研究[J]. 水动力学研究与进展A辑, 2014, 29(1):108-113. doi:10.3969/j.issn1000-4874.2014.01.-014 GAO Jie, ZHANG Liehui, LIU Qiguo, et al. Well test model of trilinear flow for fractured horizontal wells in shale gas reservoirs[J]. Chinese Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2014, 29(1):108-113. doi:10.3969/j.issn1000-4874.2014.01.014
[15] 尹洪军,赵二猛,付京,等. 页岩气藏压裂水平井五区复合模型产能分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2015, 37(3):9-16. doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2015.03.04.07 YIN Hongjun, ZHAO Ermeng, FU Jing, et al. Production analysis of composite model of five regions for fractured horizontal wells in shale gas reservoirs[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2015, 37(3):9-16. doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.-2015.03.04.07
[16] DE SWAAN O A. Analytic solutions for determining naturally fractured reservoir properties by well testing[C]. SPE 5346-PA, 1976, 16(3):117-122. doi:10.2118/5346-PA
[17] APAYDIN O G, OZKAN E, RAGHAVAN R S. Effect of discontinuous micro-fractures on ultra-tight matrix permeability of a dual-porosity medium[C]. SPE 147391-PA, 2011. doi:10.2118/147391-PA
[18] ZHANG Deliang, ZHANG Liehui, GUO Jingjing, et al. Research on the production performance of multistage fractured horizontal well in shale gas reservoir[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2015, 26:279-289. doi:10.1016/j.jngse.2015.06.032
[19] ZHANG Wei, XU Jianchun, JIANG Ruizhong. Production forecast of fractured shale gas reservoir considering multiscale gas flow[J]. Journal of Petroleum Exploration and Production Technology, 2017, 7:1071-1083. doi:10.1007/s13202-016-0281-3
[20] LU Ting, LIU Shimin, LI Zhiping. A new approach to model shale gas production behavior by considering coupled multiple flow mechanisms for multiple fractured horizontal well[J]. Fuel, 2019, 237:283-297. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2018.09.101
[21] STALGOROVA E, MATTAR L. Practical analytical model to simulate production of horizontal wells with branch fractures[C]. SPE 162515-MS, 2012. doi:10.2118/162515-MS
[22] DENG Qi, NIE Renshi, JIA Yonglu, et al. A new analytical model for non-uniformly distributed multi-fractured system in shale gas reservoirs[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2015, 27:719-737. doi:10.1016/j.jngse.2015.09.015
[23] ZHANG Liehui, GAO Jie, HU Shuyong, et al. Five-region flow model for MFHWs in dual porous shale gas reservoirs[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2016, 33:1316-1323. doi:10.1016/j.jngse.2016.05.063
[24] JAVADPOUR F. Nanopores and apparent permeability of gas flow in mudrocks (shales and siltstone)[J]. Journal of Canadian Petroleum Technology, 2009, 48(8):16-21. doi:10.2118/09-08-16-DA
[25] IGWE G J I. Gas transport mechanism and slippage phenomenon in porous media[C]. SPE 16479-MS, 1985.
[26] PRADA A, CIVAN F. Modification of Darcy's law for the threshold pressure gradient[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 1999, 22(4):237-240. doi:10.1016/S0920-4105(98)00083-7
[27] ESCOBAR F H, MARTÍNEZ J A, MADERO M M. Pressure transient analysis for a reservoir with a finiteconductivity fault[J]. CT & F Ciencia, Tecnologia y Futuro, 2017, 5(2):5-17. doi:10.1002/smr.397
[28] STEHFEST H, GOETHE J W. Remark on algorithm 368:Numerical inversion of Laplace transforms[J]. Communications of the ACM, 1970, 13(1):47-49. doi:10.1145/355598.362787

页岩气藏压裂水平井线性耦合渗流模型研究

Linear Coupling Seepage Model for Fractured Horizontal Wells in Shale Gas Reservoir

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	乐宏, 杨兆中, 范宇. 宁209井区裂缝控藏体积压裂技术研究与应用[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(5): 86-98.
[2]	张博宁, 张芮菡, 吴婷婷, 鲁友常. 致密气藏多级压裂水平井生产动态机理分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(5): 107-117.
[3]	梁洪彬, 张烈辉, 陈满, 赵玉龙, 向祖平. 快速评价页岩含气量的新方法[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(2): 110-117.
[4]	范宇, 钟成旭, 牟乃渠, 金鑫, 吴鹏程. 一种生物合成基钻井液在长宁气田的应用[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(1): 133-139.
[5]	郭肖, 杨开睿, 杨宇睿, 贾昊卫. 孔隙网络模拟渗流速度对页岩气开采的影响[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 19-27.
[6]	程小伟, 张高寅, 马志超, 李斌, 辜涛. 页岩气水平井油井水泥的原位增韧技术研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 68-74.
[7]	杨兆中, 李扬, 李小刚, 李成勇. 页岩气水平井重复压裂关键技术进展及启示[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 75-86.
[8]	李勇明, 骆昂, 吴磊, 伊向艺. 考虑应力敏感和水力裂缝方位角的页岩产能模型[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 117-123.
[9]	赵玉龙, 梁洪彬, 井翠, 商绍芬, 李成勇. 页岩气井EUR快速评价新方法[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 124-131.
[10]	胡德高, 郭肖, 郑爱维, 舒志国, 张柏桥. 页岩气藏压裂井产能评价及分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 132-138.
[11]	方全堂, 李政澜, 段永刚, 魏明强, 张羽翼. 考虑次生裂缝的页岩气藏有限导流缝网模型[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 139-145.
[12]	曾德智, 喻智明, 何奇垚, 刘乔平, 施太和. 页岩气井环空带压安全风险定量评价方法研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 146-154.
[13]	张智, 丁剑, 赵苑瑾, 邓虎, 卢齐. 页岩气井环空带压临界控制值计算方法[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 155-164.
[14]	付建红, 苏昱, 姜伟, 钟成旭, 李郑涛. 深层页岩气水平井井筒瞬态温度场研究与应用[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 165-173.
[15]	曹海涛, 关小旭, 李晓平, 赵勇, 余小群. 页岩自支撑裂缝导流能力预测方法研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(5): 134-141.