考虑应力敏感和水力裂缝方位角的页岩产能模型

doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2019.09.17.02

西南石油大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 117-123.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2019.09.17.02

考虑应力敏感和水力裂缝方位角的页岩产能模型

李勇明¹, 骆昂¹, 吴磊¹, 伊向艺²

1. 油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室·西南石油大学, 四川成都 610500;
2. 油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室·成都理工大学, 四川成都 610059

收稿日期:2019-09-17 出版日期:2019-12-10 发布日期:2019-12-10
通讯作者: 李勇明,E-mail:swpifrac@163.com
作者简介:李勇明,1974年生,男,汉族,四川营山人,教授,博士生导师,主要从事油气藏压裂酸化方面的工作。E-mail:swpifrac@163.com;骆昂,1996年生,男,汉族,四川西昌人,硕士研究生,主要从事油气藏压裂酸化方面的工作。E-mail:1054158736@qq.com;吴磊,1995年生,男,汉族,甘肃镇原人,硕士研究生,主要从事油气田开发方面的研究工作。E-mail:984084356@qq.com;伊向艺,1961年生,女,回族,辽宁法库人,教授,博士生导师,主要从事油气储层增产技术、油藏工程率等方面的研究。E-mail:yxy610059@yahoo.com.cn
基金资助:
四川省科技计划重点研发项目（2018JZ0079）

Shale Productivity Model Considering Stress Sensitivity and Hydraulic Fracture Azimuth

LI Yongming¹, LUO Ang¹, WU Lei¹, YI Xiangyi²

1. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China

Received:2019-09-17 Online:2019-12-10 Published:2019-12-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 产能预测对页岩气的高效合理开发有着重要的作用，而目前国内外对于页岩气分段压裂水平井产能的研究没有同时考虑到天然裂缝应力敏感和水力裂缝形态及渗流特征对产能的影响。为此，根据双重介质渗流理论，综合考虑了页岩储层的吸附解吸、扩散运移、天然裂缝的应力敏感效应，建立了页岩储层渗流模型；同时考虑水力裂缝的有限导流能力、裂缝方位角等因素，利用点源函数方法将裂缝离散，之后叠加建立水力裂缝模型，最后将两种模型耦合得到页岩气藏压力水平井不稳定渗流模型和产能模型。根据已建立的页岩气压裂水平井产能模型，编程计算出产能特征曲线；通过对比模拟结果分析出，与实例类似的页岩气压裂水平井的最优水力裂缝导流能为15~18 D·cm，最优缝长分布方式为外高内低的U型，最优水力裂缝间距分布为等间距分布；模拟结果与页岩气井的现场数据的对比，也验证了该模型的准确性。该研究对页岩气开发有着重要的指导意义。

关键词: 页岩气, 分段压裂水平井, 产能模型, 应力敏感, 敏感因素分析

Abstract: The productivity prediction plays an important role in the efficient and rational development of shale gas reservoirs. At present, the researches on the productivity of multi-stage fracturing horizontal wells in shale gas reservoirs at home and abroad does not take into account stress-sensitive effects of natural fractures and hydraulic fracture morphology and seepage characteristics on productivity. Therefore, based on dual medium seepage theory, considering the adsorption, desorption and diffusion mechanisms (pseudo-steady state and transient diffusion) of shale gas in reservoirs and stress-sensitive effects of natural fractures, the shale gas reservoir seepage model is established. The limited conductivity of hydraulic fractures and hydraulic fracture azimuth are considered into the hydraulic fracture model. The source function method is used to discretize the crack, and then the hydraulic fracture model is superimposed. Finally, the two models are coupled to obtain the unstable seepage model and productivity model of the multi-stage fracturing horizontal well in the shale gas reservoir. According to the established shale gas fracturing horizontal well productivity model, the productivity characteristic curve is calculated by programming. The comparative hydraulic simulation results show that the optimal hydraulic fracture conductivity of the shale gas fractured horizontal well which is similar to the example is 15~18 D·cm, the optimal distribution mode of seam length is u-shaped with outer high and inner low, and the optimal fracture spacing distribution is equidistant. The comparison between the simulation results and the field data of shale gas wells also verifies the accuracy of the model. This research is of significance to shale gas development.

Key words: shale gas, multi-stage fracturing horizontal wells, productivity model, stress-sensitive effects, sensitive factor analysis

中图分类号:

TE357

李勇明, 骆昂, 吴磊, 伊向艺. 考虑应力敏感和水力裂缝方位角的页岩产能模型[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 117-123.

LI Yongming, LUO Ang, WU Lei, YI Xiangyi. Shale Productivity Model Considering Stress Sensitivity and Hydraulic Fracture Azimuth[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 117-123.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2019.09.17.02

http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/Y2019/V41/I6/117

参考文献

[1] CHEN C, RAJAGOPAL R. A multiply-fractured horizontal well in a rectangular drainage region[J]. SPE Journal, 1997, 2(4):455-465. doi:10.2118/37072-PA
[2] HORNE R N, TEMENG K O. Relative productivities and pressure transient modeling of horizontal wells with multiple fractures[C]. SPE 29891-MS, 1995. doi:10.2118/29891-MS
[3] GUO G, EVANS R D, CHANG M. Pressure-transient behavior for a horizontal well intersecting multiple random discrete fractures[C]. SPE Annual Technical Conference, and Exhibition Society of Petroleum Engineers, 1994. doi:10.2118/28390-MS
[4] CHENG Y. Pressure transient characteristics of hydraulically fractured horizontal shale gas wells[C]. SPE 149311-MS, 2011. doi:10.2118/149311-MS
[5] ZERZAR A, TIAB D, BETTAM Y. Interpretation of multiple hydraulically fractured horizontal wells[C]. Abu Dhabi International Conference and Exhibition, Society of Petroleum Engineers, 2004. doi:10.2118/2004-027
[6] WAN J, AZIZ K. Semi-analytical well model of horizontal wells with multiple hydraulic fractures[J]. SPE Journal, 2002, 7(4):437-445. doi:10.2118/81190-PA
[7] BELLO R O, WATTENBARGER R A. Multi-stage hydraulically fractured horizontal shale gas well rate transient analysis[C]. SPE 126754-MS, 2010. doi:10.2118/126754-MS
[8] ABOABA A L, CHENG Y. Estimation of fracture properties for a horizontal well with multiple hydraulic fractures in gas shale[C]. SPE 138524-MS, 2010. doi:10.2118/138524-MS
[9] WANG Haitao. Performance of multiple fractured horizontal wells in shale gas reservoirs with consideration of multiple mechanisms[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2014, 510:299-312. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.12.019
[10] BROHI I G, POOLADI-DARVISH M, AGUILERA R. Modeling fractured horizontal wells as dual porosity composite reservoirs:Application to tight gas, shale gas and tight oil cases[C]. SPE 144057-MS, 2011. doi:10.2118/144057-MS
[11] OZKAN E, BROWN M L, RAGHAVAN R, et al. Comparison of fractured-horizontal-well performance in tight sand and shale reservoirs[J]. SPE Reservoir Evaluation & Engineering, 2011, 14(2):248-259. doi:10.2118/121290-PA
[12] 高杰,张烈辉,刘启国,等. 页岩气藏压裂水平井三线性流试井模型研究[J]. 水动力学研究与进展, 2014, 29(1):108-113. doi:10.3969/j.issn1000-4874.2014.01.-014 GAO Jie, ZHANG Liehui, LIU Qiguo, et al. Well test model of trilinear flow for fractured horizontal wells in shale gas reservoirs[J]. Journal of Hydrodynamics, 2014, 29(1):108-113. doi:10.3969/j.issn1000-4874.2014.01.014
[13] 黄红良. 多井条件下页岩气水平井产能影响因素研究[D]. 北京:中国石油大学(北京), 2017.
[14] 贾永禄,邓祺,聂仁仕,等. 低渗透压裂井非对称区域三线性渗流模型[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2016, 38(2):95-102. doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2013.06.14.02 JIA Yonglu, DENG Qi, NIE Renshi, et al. Trilinear-flow model of fractured well on asymmetric regions for lowpermeability reservoir[J]. Journal of Southwest Petroleum University (Science & Technology Edition), 2016, 38(2):95-102. doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2013.06.14.02
[15] DELIANG Z, LIEHUI Z, JINGJING G, et al. Research on the production performance of multistage fractured horizontal well in shale gas reservoir[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2015, 26:279-289. doi:10.1016/j.jngse.2015.06.032
[16] JIANG J, YOUNIS R M. A multimechanistic multicontinuum model for simulating shale gas reservoir with complex fractured system[J]. Fuel, 2015, 161:333-344. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2015.08.069
[17] 张琪,苏玉亮,张敏. 页岩储层压裂水平井非达西渗流模型及产能分析[C]. 青岛:第十三届全国水动力学学术会议暨第二十六届全国水动力学研讨会, 2014.
[18] OZKAN E. New solutions for well-test-analysis problems:Part III-Additional algorithms[J]. SPE 28424-MS, 1994. doi:10.2118/28424-MS
[19] OZKAN E, RAGHAVAN R. New solutions for welltest-analysis problems:part 1-analytical considerations[J]. SPE Formation Evaluation, 1991, 6(3):359-368. doi:10.2118/18615-PA
[20] OZKAN E, RAGHAVAN R. New solutions for well-testanalysis problems:Part 2 Computational considerations and applications[J]. SPE Formation Evaluation, 1991, 6(3):369-378. doi:10.2118/18616-PA

考虑应力敏感和水力裂缝方位角的页岩产能模型

Shale Productivity Model Considering Stress Sensitivity and Hydraulic Fracture Azimuth

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	乐宏, 杨兆中, 范宇. 宁209井区裂缝控藏体积压裂技术研究与应用[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(5): 86-98.
[2]	梁洪彬, 张烈辉, 陈满, 赵玉龙, 向祖平. 快速评价页岩含气量的新方法[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(2): 110-117.
[3]	罗川, 周鹏高, 杨虎, 石建刚. 低渗透储层应力敏感特征探讨[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(1): 119-125.
[4]	范宇, 钟成旭, 牟乃渠, 金鑫, 吴鹏程. 一种生物合成基钻井液在长宁气田的应用[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(1): 133-139.
[5]	肖文联, 张骏强, 杜洋, 赵金洲, 赵哲军. 页岩带压渗吸核磁共振响应特征实验研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 13-18.
[6]	张烈辉, 崔乾晨, 谢军, 郑健, 李成勇. 页岩气藏压裂水平井线性耦合渗流模型研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 1-12.
[7]	郭肖, 杨开睿, 杨宇睿, 贾昊卫. 孔隙网络模拟渗流速度对页岩气开采的影响[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 19-27.
[8]	程小伟, 张高寅, 马志超, 李斌, 辜涛. 页岩气水平井油井水泥的原位增韧技术研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 68-74.
[9]	杨兆中, 李扬, 李小刚, 李成勇. 页岩气水平井重复压裂关键技术进展及启示[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 75-86.
[10]	赵玉龙, 梁洪彬, 井翠, 商绍芬, 李成勇. 页岩气井EUR快速评价新方法[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 124-131.
[11]	胡德高, 郭肖, 郑爱维, 舒志国, 张柏桥. 页岩气藏压裂井产能评价及分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 132-138.
[12]	方全堂, 李政澜, 段永刚, 魏明强, 张羽翼. 考虑次生裂缝的页岩气藏有限导流缝网模型[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 139-145.
[13]	曾德智, 喻智明, 何奇垚, 刘乔平, 施太和. 页岩气井环空带压安全风险定量评价方法研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 146-154.
[14]	张智, 丁剑, 赵苑瑾, 邓虎, 卢齐. 页岩气井环空带压临界控制值计算方法[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 155-164.
[15]	付建红, 苏昱, 姜伟, 钟成旭, 李郑涛. 深层页岩气水平井井筒瞬态温度场研究与应用[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 165-173.