页岩气水平井井壁裂缝起裂力学行为研究

doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2019.09.16.05

西南石油大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2019, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (6): 87-99.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2019.09.16.05

页岩气水平井井壁裂缝起裂力学行为研究

马天寿¹, 彭念¹, 陈平¹, 邓智中²

1. 油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室·西南石油大学, 四川成都 610500;
2. 油气藏地质及开发工程国家重点实验室·成都理工大学, 四川成都 610059

收稿日期:2019-09-16 出版日期:2019-12-10 发布日期:2019-12-10
通讯作者: 陈平,E-mail:chenping@swpu.edu.cn
作者简介:马天寿,1987年生,男,汉族,四川绵阳人,副研究员,博士(后),主要从事油气井工程教学与科研工作。E-mail:matianshou@126.com;彭念,1993年生,男,汉族,重庆万州人,博士研究生,主要从事油气井岩石力学、随钻地层压力测量方面的研究工作。E-mail:peng_nian@126.com;陈平,1952年生,男,汉族,四川成都人,教授,博士生导师,主要从事油气井特别是定向井、丛式井、水平井、侧钻水平井等特殊油气井的钻井技术研究工作。E-mail:chenping@swpu.edu.cn;邓智中,1983年生,男,汉族,四川成都人,博士(后),主要从事钻完井过程中的防漏堵漏方面的研究工作。E-mail:376382485@qq.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（51604230，41874216）；四川省国际科技合作与交流项目（2017HH0061）；四川省科技计划重点研发项目（2018JZ0079）

Wellbore Fracture Initiation Mechanical Behavior in a Horizontal Shale Gas Well

MA Tianshou¹, PENG Nian¹, CHEN Ping¹, DENG Zhizhong²

1. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Southwest Petroleum University, Chengdu, Sichuan 610500, China;
2. State Key Laboratory of Oil and Gas Reservoir Geology and Exploitation, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, Sichuan 610059, China

Received:2019-09-16 Online:2019-12-10 Published:2019-12-10

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 为了弄清层状页岩各向异性对井壁裂缝起裂力学行为的影响，以四川盆地下志留系龙马溪页岩为研究对象，开展了不同角度下页岩单轴压缩和巴西劈裂实验，明确了页岩弹性和抗张强度各向异性特征，建立了考虑页岩各向异性的水平井井壁裂缝起裂力学模型，并分析了不同因素影响下井壁裂缝起裂规律。结果表明：弹性模量各向异性、地应力比值、抗张强度各向异性和孔隙压力对裂缝起裂压力影响显著，而泊松比各向异性影响较小；弹性模量各向异性、地应力比值对裂缝起裂位置和起裂倾角影响显著，而泊松比各向异性、抗张强度各向异性和孔隙压力的影响较小；井壁裂缝起裂力学行为与井眼方位密切相关，当井眼方位靠近最大或最小水平主应力方向时，井壁裂缝起裂力学行为差异随井眼方位的变化较小；当井眼方位同时远离最大和最小水平主应力方向时，井壁裂缝起裂力学行为差异随井眼方位的变化较大。研究结果可为页岩气水平井钻井井漏预防和水力压裂设计提供理论依据和参考。

关键词: 页岩, 水平井, 井壁裂缝, 各向异性, 起裂压力, 起裂轨迹

Abstract: In order to clarify the effect of anisotropy of layered shale on the wellbore fracture initiation mechanical behavior, the uniaxial compression testing and Brazilian split testing experiments with different angle were conducted for LMX shale in the Lower Silurian Sichuan Basin. The anisotropic characteristics of elastic modulus and tensile strength were specified, and a wellbore fracture initiation mechanical model of shale gas horizontal wells was established considering the anisotropy of shale. The wellbore fracture initiation behaviors under different influencing factors are also analysed. The results show that:modulus anisotropy, in-situ stress difference, tensile strength anisotropy and pore pressure all have an obvious effect on fracture-initiation pressure but Poisson's ratio anisotropy has slightly effect on it. Modulus anisotropy and in-situ stress difference also have a significant influence on wellbore fracture initiation location and inclination angle, Poisson's ratio anisotropy, tensile strength anisotropy and pore pressure, however, have slight effects on that. Wellbore fracture initiation mechanical behaviour is closely related to wellbore azimuth; when the borehole azimuth is close to the direction of maximum or minimum horizontal principal stress, the difference of wellbore fracture initiation mechanical behavior varies slightly with borehole azimuth changing, while when the borehole azimuth is far away from the direction of maximum and minimum horizontal principal stress, the difference of wellbore fracture initiation mechanical behavior varies greatly with the changing of borehole azimuth. The research results can provide theoretical basis and reference for well leakage prevention during drilling and hydraulic fracturing design of shale gas horizontal wells.

Key words: shale, horizontal wells, wellbore fracture, anisotropy, fracture-initiation pressure, fracture-initiation trajectory

中图分类号:

TE328

马天寿, 彭念, 陈平, 邓智中. 页岩气水平井井壁裂缝起裂力学行为研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 87-99.

MA Tianshou, PENG Nian, CHEN Ping, DENG Zhizhong. Wellbore Fracture Initiation Mechanical Behavior in a Horizontal Shale Gas Well[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 87-99.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2019.09.16.05

http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/Y2019/V41/I6/87

参考文献

[1] JIANG Yongdong, LUO Yahuang, LU Yiyu, et al. Effects of supercritical CO₂ treatment time, pressure, and temperature on microstructure of shale[J]. Energy, 2016, 97:173-181. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2015.12.124
[2] YANG Feng, NING Zhengfu, LIU Huiqing. Fractal characteristics of shales from a shale gas reservoir in the Sichuan Basin, China[J]. Fuel, 2014, 115:378-384. doi:10.1016/j.fuel.2013.07.040
[3] 贾爱林,位云生,金亦秋. 中国海相页岩气开发评价关键技术进展[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(6):949-955. doi:10.11698/PED.2016.06.11 JIA Ailin, WEI Yunsheng, JIN Yiqiu. Progress in key technologies for evaluating marine shale gas development in China[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(6):949-955. doi:10.11698/PED.2016.06.11
[4] 路保平,丁士东. 中国石化页岩气工程技术新进展与发展展望[J]. 石油钻探技术, 2018, 46(1):1-9. doi:10.11911/syztjs.2018001 LU Baoping, DING Shidong. New progress and development prospect in shale gas engineering technologies of SINOPEC[J]. Petroleum Drilling Techniques, 2018, 46(1):1-9. doi:10.11911/syztjs.2018001
[5] 贾承造,郑民,张永峰. 中国非常规油气资源与勘探开发前景[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2012, 39(2):129-136. doi:10.1016/S1876-3804(12)60026-3 JIA Chengzao, ZHENG Min, ZHANG Yongfeng. Unconventional hydrocarbon resources in China and the prospect of exploration and development[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2012, 39(2):129-136. doi:10.1016/S1876-3804(12)60026-3
[6] 邹才能,董大忠,王玉满,等. 中国页岩气特征、挑战及前景(二)[J]. 石油勘探与开发, 2016, 43(2):166-178. doi:10.11698/PED.2016.02.02 ZOU Caineng, DONG Dazhong, WANG Yuman, et al. Shale gas in China:Characteristics, challenges and prospects (II)[J]. Petroleum Exploration and Development, 2016, 43(2):166-178. doi:10.11698/PED.2016.02.-02
[7] JIANG Yongdong, QIN Chao, KANG Zhipeng, et al. Experimental study of supercritical CO₂ fracturing on initiation pressure and fracture propagation in shale under different triaxial stress conditions[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2018, 55:382-394. doi:10.1016/j.jngse.2018.04.022
[8] MA Tianshou, LIU Yang, CHEN Ping, et al. Fractureinitiation pressure prediction for transversely isotropic formations[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2019, 176:821-835. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2019.01.090
[9] DING Yi, LIU Xiangjun, LUO Pingya. The analytical model of hydraulic fracture initiation for perforated borehole in fractured formation[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2018, 162:502-512. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2017.10.008
[10] HUANG Jinsong, GRIFFITHS D V, WONG Sau-Wai. Initiation pressure, location and orientation of hydraulic fracture[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2012, 49:59-67. doi:10.1016/j.ijrmms.-2011.11.014
[11] HOSSAIN M M, RAHMAN M K, RAHMAN S S. Hydraulic fracture initiation and propagation:roles of wellbore trajectory, perforation and stress regimes[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2000, 27(3-4):129-149. doi:10.1016/S0920-4105(00)00056-5
[12] GALE J F W, REED R M, HOLDER J. Natural fractures in the Barnett Shale and their importance for hydraulic fracture treatments[J]. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Bulletin, 2007, 91(4):603-622. doi:10.1306/11010606061
[13] HUBBERT M K, WILLIS D G W. Mechanics of hydraulic fracturing[J]. AIME Petroleum Transactions, 1957, 210:153-168. doi:10.1080/14786435708241195
[14] HAIMSON B. Initiation and extension of hydraulic fractures in rocks[C]. SPE 1710-PA, 1967. doi:10.2118/1710-PA
[15] EATON B A. Fracture gradient prediction and its application in oilfield operations[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1969, 21(10):1353-1360. doi:10.2118/2163-PA
[16] ANDERSON R A, INGRAM D S, ZANIER A M. Fracture gradient prediction and its application in oilfield operations[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1969, 21(10):1353-1360. doi:10.2118/2163-PA
[17] DAINES S R. Prediction of fracture pressures for wildcat wells[J]. Journal of Petroleum Technology, 1982, 34(4):863-872. doi:10.2118/9254-PA
[18] CHEN Guizhong, CHENEVERT M E, SHARMA M M, et al. A study of wellbore stability in shales including poroelastic, chemical, and thermal effects[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2003, 38(3-4):167-176. doi:10.1016/S0920-4105(03)00030-5
[19] 金衍,张旭东,陈勉. 天然裂缝地层中垂直井水力裂缝起裂压力模型研究[J]. 石油学报, 2005, 26(6):113-118. doi:10.3321/j.issn:0253-2697.2005.06.026 JIN Yan, ZHANG Xudong, CHEN Mian. Initiation pressure models for hydraulic fracturing of vertical wells in naturally fractured formation[J]. Acta Petrolei Sinica, 2005, 26(6):113-118. doi:10.3321/j.issn:0253-2697.-2005.06.026
[20] WU Bisheng, ZHANG Xi, JEFFREY R G, et al. A semianalytic solution of a wellbore in a non-isothermal lowpermeability porous medium under non-hydrostatic stresses[J]. International Journal of Solids and Structures, 2012, 49(13):1472-1484. doi:10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2012.02.035
[21] JIN Xiaochun, SHAH N S, ROEGIERS J C, et al. Breakdown pressure determination:A fracture mechanics approach[C]. SPE 166434-MS, 2013. doi:10.2118/166434-MS
[22] ZHANG Jincai, YIN Shangxian. Fracture gradient prediction:An overview and an improved method[J]. Petroleum Science, 2017, 14(4):720-730. doi:10.1007/s12182-017-0182-1
[23] ZENG Fanhui, CHENG Xiaozhao, GUO Jianchun, et al. Investigation of the initiation pressure and fracture geometry of fractured deviated wells[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2018, 165:412-427. doi:10.1016/j.petrol.2018.02.029
[24] SAYERS C M. The effect of anisotropy on the Young's moduli and Poisson's ratios of shales[J]. Geophysical Prospecting, 2013, 61(2):416-426. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2478.2012.01130.x
[25] JIN Zhefei, LI Weixin, JIN Congrui, et al. Anisotropic elastic, strength, and fracture properties of Marcellus shale[J]. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 2018, 109:124-137. doi:10.1016/j.ijrmms.2018.06.009
[26] MA Tianshou, ZHANG Q B, CHEN Ping, et al. Fracture pressure model for inclined wells in layered formations with anisotropic rock strengths[J]. Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering, 2017, 149:393-408.10.1016/j.petrol.2016.10.050
[27] MA Tianshou, WU Bisheng, FU Jianhong, et al. Fracture pressure prediction for layered formations with anisotropic rock strengths[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2017, 38:485-503. doi:10.1016/j.jngse.2017.-01.002
[28] WANG Jun, XIE Lingzhi, XIE Heping, et al. Effect of layer orientation on acoustic emission characteristics of anisotropic shale in Brazilian tests[J]. Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering, 2016, 36:1120-1129. doi:10.1016/j.jngse.-2016.03.046
[29] ZHANG S W, SHOU K J, XIAN X F, et al. Fractal characteristics and acoustic emission of anisotropic shale in Brazilian tests[J]. Tunnelling and Underground Space Technology, 2018, 71:298-308. doi:10.1016/j.tust.2017.-08.031
[30] AADNOY B S. Modeling of the stability of highly inclined boreholes in anisotropic rock formations[J]. SPE 16526-MS, 1988. doi:10.2118/16526-MS
[31] ONG S H, ROEGIERS J C. Fracture initiation from inclined wellbores in anisotropic formations[C]. SPE 29993-MS, 1995. doi:10.2118/29993-MS
[32] KHAN S, WILLIAMS R E, ANSARI S, et al. Impact of mechanical anisotropy on design of hydraulic fracturing in shales[C]. SPE 162138-MS, 2012. doi:10.2118/162138-MS
[33] 李小刚,易良平,杨兆中. 横观各向同性地层水平井井壁拟三维应力场计算模型[J]. 岩石力学与工程学报,2017,36(6):1452-1459. doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.-2016.1046 LI Xiaogang, YI Liangping, YANG Zhaozhong. A pseudo three-dimensional stress model of horizontal borewell in transversely isotropic formation[J]. Chinese Journal of Rock Mechanics and Engineering, 2017, 36(6):1452-1459. doi:10.13722/j.cnki.jrme.2016.1046
[34] 马天寿. 页岩气水平井井眼坍塌失稳机理研究[D]. 成都:西南石油大学, 2015. MA Tianshou. Research on the mechanisms of borehole collapse instability for horizontal wells in shale gas reservoirs[D]. Chengdu:Southwest Petroleum University, 2015.

页岩气水平井井壁裂缝起裂力学行为研究

Wellbore Fracture Initiation Mechanical Behavior in a Horizontal Shale Gas Well

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	陈雪, 徐剑良, 黎菁, 肖剑锋, 钟思存. 威远区块页岩气水平井产量主控因素分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(5): 63-74.
[2]	乐宏, 杨兆中, 范宇. 宁209井区裂缝控藏体积压裂技术研究与应用[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(5): 86-98.
[3]	张博宁, 张芮菡, 吴婷婷, 鲁友常. 致密气藏多级压裂水平井生产动态机理分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(5): 107-117.
[4]	李小刚, 李昀昀, 胡秋萍, 张翔, 易良平. 考虑岩石弹塑性变形的井周应力场计算模型研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(5): 135-144.
[5]	黄亮, 王国荣, 徐靖, 魏安超, 贾杜平. 水平井完井管柱振动特性实验研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(5): 170-178.
[6]	何小川, 欧家强. 磨溪雷一¹气藏高效开发主体技术与成效[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(4): 144-154.
[7]	钟文建, 李双贵, 熊宇楼, 付建红, 苏昱. 超深水平井钻柱动力学研究及强度校核[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(4): 135-143.
[8]	于学亮, 胥云, 翁定为, 蒋豪, 段瑶瑶. 页岩油藏“密切割”体积改造产能影响因素分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(3): 132-143.
[9]	刘辰生, 王辉, 史乐, 冯宁. 湖南雪峰山前陆盆地沉积特征及页岩气勘探潜力[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(2): 61-74.
[10]	梁洪彬, 张烈辉, 陈满, 赵玉龙, 向祖平. 快速评价页岩含气量的新方法[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(2): 110-117.
[11]	胡锡辉, 李维, 徐璧华, 马旌伦, 袁彬. 水平井带扶正器套管接触方式及其对摩阻影响[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(2): 158-165.
[12]	范宇, 钟成旭, 牟乃渠, 金鑫, 吴鹏程. 一种生物合成基钻井液在长宁气田的应用[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(1): 133-139.
[13]	肖文联, 张骏强, 杜洋, 赵金洲, 赵哲军. 页岩带压渗吸核磁共振响应特征实验研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 13-18.
[14]	欧成华, 杨晓, 梁成钢, 黄毅, 朱海燕. 页岩小层水平井对比及其构造三维可视化表征[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 44-50.
[15]	张烈辉, 崔乾晨, 谢军, 郑健, 李成勇. 页岩气藏压裂水平井线性耦合渗流模型研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 1-12.