基于环境约束的页岩气-水资源系统多层决策

doi:10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2017.07.27.02

西南石油大学学报(自然科学版) ›› 2018, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (4): 151-161.DOI: 10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2017.07.27.02

基于环境约束的页岩气-水资源系统多层决策

陈义忠^1,2, 何理^1,2, 赵洪海², 刘佳²

1. “石油石化污染物控制与处理”国家重点实验室·中国石油安全环保技术研究院环保技术研究所, 北京昌平 102206;
2. 华北电力大学可再生能源学院, 北京昌平 102206

收稿日期:2017-07-27 出版日期:2018-08-01 发布日期:2018-08-01
通讯作者: 何理,E-mail:li.he@ncepu.edu.cn
作者简介:陈义忠,1989年生,男,汉族,福建连江人,博士研究生,主要从事环境与能源系统规划研究。E-mail:fjchenyizhong@163.com;何理,1976年生,男,汉族,湖南株洲人,教授,博士生导师,主要从事地下水与土壤修复,环境与能源系统规划研究。E-mail:helix111@tju.edu.cn;赵洪海,1993年生,男,汉族,山东潍坊人,硕士,主要从事水文学及水资源研究。E-mail:zhaohh5678@163.com;刘佳,1994年生,女,汉族,新疆昌吉人,硕士,主要从事水文学及水资源研究。E-mail:liujia94@126.com
基金资助:
中国科学院战略性先导科技专项（XDA20040302）；"石油石化污染物控制与处理"国家重点实验室开放课题（PPC2016013）；中央高校基本科研基金（jb2017007）

Multicriteria Decision Making for a Shale Gas Water Resource System with Environmental Constraints Taken into Account

CHEN Yizhong^1,2, HE Li^1,2, ZHAO Honghai², LIU Jia²

1. State Key Laboratory of Petroleum Pollution Control, CNPC Research Institute of Safety and Environmental Technology, Changping, Beijing 102206, China;
2. School of Renewable Energy, North China Electric Power University, Changping, Beijing 102206, China

Received:2017-07-27 Online:2018-08-01 Published:2018-08-01

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 针对马塞勒斯页岩气供应系统中的经济效益、水资源配置和温室气体减排这3个要素，开发基于生命周期评价的多层规划模型，并设置了高、低钻井和产气的两种规划情景。结果表明，在规划期内，高情景和低情景条件下的产气量分别达到882.31 bcf和472.40 bcf；生命周期耗水量主要用于水力压裂和终端发电；原地处理设施将在废水处理过程中占主导作用，且绝大部分的工艺废水将实现回用；系统平均单位电力的温室气体排放强度、经济效益和用水量将分别达到6.00 kg/MJ、0.48 MJ^-1和0.10 gal/MJ。结合TOPSIS多属性决策分析，表明多层方案能够规避传统单目标规划模型偏向性过强等不足，并为决策者提供不同模型规划方案的优劣排放。

关键词: 页岩气, 水资源配置, 温室气体, 多层规划, 多属性决策

Abstract: A life-cycle-evaluation-based multicriteria planning model was developed for the Marcellus shale gas supply system to examine three of its component factors (economic benefit, water resource allocation, and greenhouse gas emission reduction) in two scenarios (high and low drilling production output). The research results show that gas output in the planned lifecycle for the high and low-production scenarios is 882.31 bcf and 472.40 bcf, respectively; the water to be consumed during the lifecycle is essentially for hydraulic fracturing and terminal electricity generation; wastewater treatment will be essentially realized by the on-site equipment, with the vast majority of the production wastewater to be recycled. The system's average greenhouse gas emission, economic benefit, and water consumption per unit of electric power will be 6.00 kg/MJ, 0.48 MJ^-1, and 0.10 gal/MJ, respectively. As supported by a multicriteria decision analysis using the TOPSIS method, the multicriteria planning avoids the strong bias of traditional single-criterion planning models and provides decision makers with information about the advantages and disadvantages of different planning models.

Key words: shale gas, water resources allocation, greenhouse gas, multicriteria planning, multicriteria decision making

中图分类号:

TE34

陈义忠, 何理, 赵洪海, 刘佳. 基于环境约束的页岩气-水资源系统多层决策[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 40(4): 151-161.

CHEN Yizhong, HE Li, ZHAO Honghai, LIU Jia. Multicriteria Decision Making for a Shale Gas Water Resource System with Environmental Constraints Taken into Account[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2018, 40(4): 151-161.

0
/ / 推荐

导出引用管理器 EndNote|Ris|BibTeX

链接本文: http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/10.11885/j.issn.1674-5086.2017.07.27.02

http://journal15.magtechjournal.com/Jwk_xnzk/CN/Y2018/V40/I4/151

参考文献

[1] ZHAO Xinguan, YANG Yahui. The current situation of shale gas in Sichuan, China[J]. Renewable & Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2015, 50:653-664. doi:10.1016/j.rser.-2015.05.023
[2] WARNER N R, DARRAH T H, JACKSON R B, et al. Geochemical evidence for possible natural migration of Marcellus Formation brine to shallow aquifers in Pennsylvania[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2012, 109(30):11961-11966. doi:10.1073/pnas.1121181109
[3] JACKSON R B, VENGOSH A, DARRAH T H, et al. Increased stray gas abundance in a subset of drinking water wells near Marcellus shale gas extraction[J]. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2013, 110(28):11250-11255. doi:10.1073/-pnas.1221635110
[4] HOWARTH R W, SANTORO R, INGRAFFEA A. Venting and leaking of methane from shale gas development:Response to Cathles et al.[J]. Climatic Change, 2012, 113(2):537-549. doi:10.1007/s10584-012-0401-0
[5] YOU Fengqi, TAO Ling, GRAZIANO D J, et al. Optimal design of sustainable cellulosic biofuel supply chains:Multiobjective optimization coupled with life cycle assessment and input-output analysis[J]. Aiche Journal, 2012, 58(4):1157-1180. doi:10.1002/aic.12637
[6] SANTIBAÑEZAGUILAR J E, GONZÁLEZCAMPOS J B, PONCEORTEGA J M, et al. Optimal planning and site selection for distributed multiproduct biorefineries involving economic, environmental and social objectives[J]. Journal of Cleaner Production, 2014, 65:270-294. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.08.004
[7] YUE Dajun, YOU Fengqi. Stackelberg-Game-Based modeling and optimization for supply chain design and operations:A mixed integer bilevel programming framework[J]. Computers & Chemical Engineering, 2017, 102:81-95. doi:10.1016/j. compchemeng.2016.07.026
[8] CHENG Xi, HE Li, LU Hongwei, et al. Optimal water resources management and system benefit for the Marcellus shale-gas reservoir in Pennsylvania and West Virginia[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2016, 540:412-422. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2016.06.041
[9] GAO Jiyao, YOU Fengqi. Economic and environmental life cycle optimization of noncooperative supply chains and product systems:Modeling framework, mixed-integer bilevel fractional programming algorithm, and shale gas application[J]. ACS Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2017, 5:3362-3381. doi:10.1021/acssuschemeng.-7b00002
[10] ZENG Bo, WEN Junqiang, SHI Jinyue, et al. A multi-level approach to active distribution system planning for efficient renewable energy harvesting in a deregulated environment[J]. Energy, 2016, 96:614-624. doi:10.1016/j.-energy.2015.12.070
[11] CHEN Yizhong, HE Li, GUAN Yanlong, et al. Life cycle assessment of greenhouse gas emissions and waterenergy optimization for shale gas supply chain planning based on multi-level approach:Case study in Barnett, Marcellus, Fayetteville, and Haynesville shales[J]. Energy Conversion & Management, 2017, 134:382-398. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2016.12.019
[12] 何培,冯连勇, WILBER T. 马塞勒斯页岩气藏单井产量递减规律及可采储量预测[J]. 新疆石油地质, 2015, 36(2):249-252. doi:10.7657/XJPG20150224 HE Pei, FENG Lianyong, WILBER T. Production decline rule and recoverable reserves prediction of Marcellus shale gas well in a production unit, Pennsylvania, US(in Chinese)[J]. Xinjiang Petroleum Geology, 2015, 36(2):249-252. doi:10.7657/XJPG20150224
[13] CHEN Yizhong, LU Hongwei, LI Jing, et al. A leaderfollower-interactive method for regional water resources management with considering multiple water demands and eco-environmental constraints[J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2017, 548:121-134. doi:10.1016/j.jhydrol.2017.02.-015
[14] SINHA S. Fuzzy programming approach to multi-level programming problems[J]. Fuzzy Sets & Systems, 2003, 136(2):189-202. doi:10.1016/S0165-0114(02)00362-7
[15] RAJ R, GHANDEHARIUN S, KUMAR A, A well-towire life cycle assessment of Canadian shale gas for electricity generation in China[J]. Energy, 2016, 111:642-652. doi:10.1016/j.energy.2016.05.079
[16] GAO Jiyao, YOU Fengqi. Shale gas supply chain design and operations toward better economic and life cycle environmental performance:MINLP model and global optimization algorithm[J]. Acs Sustainable Chemistry & Engineering, 2015, 3(7):1282-1291. doi:10.1021/-acssuschemeng.5b00122
[17] PAN Tao, ZHU Xiaodong, YE Yaping. Estimate of lifecycle greenhouse gas emissions from a vertical subsurface flow constructed wetland and conventional wastewater treatment plants:A case study in China[J]. Ecological Engineering, 2011, 37(2):248-254. doi:10.1016/j.-ecoleng.2010.11.014
[18] WEIJERMARS R. US shale gas production outlook based on well roll-out rate scenarios[J]. Applied Energy, 2014, 124(1):283-297. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2014.02.058
[19] XI B D, SU J, HUANG G H, et al. An integrated optimization approach and multi-criteria decision analysis for supporting the waste-management system of the city of Beijing, China[J]. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 2010, 23:620-631. doi:10.1016/j.engappai.-2010.01.002
[20] SEYEDMOHAMMADI J, SARMADIAN F, JAFARZADEH A A, et al. Application of SAW, TOPSIS and fuzzy TOPSIS models in cultivation priority planning for maize, rapeseed and soybean crops[J]. Geoderma, 2018, 310:178-190. doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2017.09.012
[21] SUN Liyan, MIAO Chenlin, YANG Li. Ecologicaleconomic efficiency evaluation of green technology innovation in strategic emerging industries based on entropy weighted TOPSIS method[J]. Ecological Indicators, 2017, 73:554-558. doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.10.018
[22] 熊雪珍,何新玥,陈星,等. 基于改进TOPSIS法的水资源配置方案评价[J]. 水资源保护, 2016, 32(2):14-20. doi:10.3880/j.issn.1004-6933.2016.02.004 XIONG Xuezhen, HE Xinyue, CHEN Xing, et al. Evaluatio non water resources allocation schemes based on improved TOPSIS[J]. 2016, 32(2):14-20. doi:10.3880/-j.issn.1004-6933.2016.02.004
[23] LI Jing, HE Li, CHEN Yizhong, et al. A bilevel groundwater management model with minimization of stochastic health risks at the leader level and remediation cost at the follower level[J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2017, 31(10):2547-2571. doi:10.-1007/s00477-016-1351-2

基于环境约束的页岩气-水资源系统多层决策

Multicriteria Decision Making for a Shale Gas Water Resource System with Environmental Constraints Taken into Account

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	乐宏, 杨兆中, 范宇. 宁209井区裂缝控藏体积压裂技术研究与应用[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(5): 86-98.
[2]	梁洪彬, 张烈辉, 陈满, 赵玉龙, 向祖平. 快速评价页岩含气量的新方法[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(2): 110-117.
[3]	范宇, 钟成旭, 牟乃渠, 金鑫, 吴鹏程. 一种生物合成基钻井液在长宁气田的应用[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2020, 42(1): 133-139.
[4]	张烈辉, 崔乾晨, 谢军, 郑健, 李成勇. 页岩气藏压裂水平井线性耦合渗流模型研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 1-12.
[5]	郭肖, 杨开睿, 杨宇睿, 贾昊卫. 孔隙网络模拟渗流速度对页岩气开采的影响[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 19-27.
[6]	程小伟, 张高寅, 马志超, 李斌, 辜涛. 页岩气水平井油井水泥的原位增韧技术研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 68-74.
[7]	杨兆中, 李扬, 李小刚, 李成勇. 页岩气水平井重复压裂关键技术进展及启示[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 75-86.
[8]	李勇明, 骆昂, 吴磊, 伊向艺. 考虑应力敏感和水力裂缝方位角的页岩产能模型[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 117-123.
[9]	赵玉龙, 梁洪彬, 井翠, 商绍芬, 李成勇. 页岩气井EUR快速评价新方法[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 124-131.
[10]	胡德高, 郭肖, 郑爱维, 舒志国, 张柏桥. 页岩气藏压裂井产能评价及分析[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 132-138.
[11]	方全堂, 李政澜, 段永刚, 魏明强, 张羽翼. 考虑次生裂缝的页岩气藏有限导流缝网模型[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 139-145.
[12]	曾德智, 喻智明, 何奇垚, 刘乔平, 施太和. 页岩气井环空带压安全风险定量评价方法研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 146-154.
[13]	张智, 丁剑, 赵苑瑾, 邓虎, 卢齐. 页岩气井环空带压临界控制值计算方法[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 155-164.
[14]	付建红, 苏昱, 姜伟, 钟成旭, 李郑涛. 深层页岩气水平井井筒瞬态温度场研究与应用[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(6): 165-173.
[15]	曹海涛, 关小旭, 李晓平, 赵勇, 余小群. 页岩自支撑裂缝导流能力预测方法研究[J]. 西南石油大学学报(自然科学版), 2019, 41(5): 134-141.